Non-sub: Statutory Interpretation Flashcards
Describe the literal rule
Judge is required to consider what the legislation actually says, not consider what it means.
Lord Esher “If the words of the act are clear, you must follow them, even if they lead to a manifest absurdity”
Judge should give the word in legislation their ordinary Oxford dictionary definition from the time the act is passed
Advantages of the literal rule
- Leaves law making to parliament. Parliament sovereignty is respected
- Means solicitors can advise their clients to the most likely outcome of their case because it’s predictable and certain
Disadvantages of the literal rule
- Unfair / Unjust decisions leading to bad precedent.
- Ignoring parliaments intention, parliament wouldn’t want absurd results
- Words may have more than one meaning so the act is unclear
The golden rule
An extension of the literal rule.
Makes court allowed to avoid interpretation that would lead to absurd results.
Narrow application of the golden rule
Where the words are capable of more than one meaning then you can choose between the 2 meaning then you can choose between the 2 meanings.
R V ALLEN - Problems with the wording, a person already married couldn’t marry. Courts took “shall marry” to mean “go through marriage ceremony”
Wider application to the golden rule
Where the words have only one meaning but that meaning would lead to an unsatisfactory result
RE SIGSWORTH - stopper son from inheriting estate of his mother that he murdered
Advantages of the golden rule
1) Respects the exact working of the parliament except in limited situations with the literal rule.
2) Allows judges to choose most sensible meaning of words
3) Judges are still seem to be applying law upholding the doctrine of the Separation of Powere
Disadvantage of the golden rule
- It’s limited in its use, only used in rare occasions
- It’s not always possible to predict when the courts will use it so makes the outcome of cases unpredictable for lawyers to advise clients on whether to pursue a case
Mischief rule
Judges fill in the ‘gaps’ in the law.
Attempt to discover the intention of parliament, most flexible rule.
Mischief rule makes court consider….
- What was the law before the act was passed
- The judges look at this common law in order to establish what gap or mischief the act was intended to cover
- The court should then interpret the act in such a way that the gap is covered.
First used in HEYDONS case.
SMITH V HUGHES - Street Offences Act, charged with “soliciting in a street or public place”, balcony was interpreted as public place.
Advantages of the mischief rule
- Avoids absurdity and injustice of literal rule
- Flexibility
- Allows judges to fill in the gaps
Disadvantages of the mischief rule
- Risk of judicial law making which is undemocratic
- Makes law uncertain, impossible to know when a judge may use the rule
Purposive approach
Beyond mischief rule, judges decide what they believe parliment meant to achieve, the PURPOSE OF THE ACT.
It is a broad approach that can lead to justice individual case allowing the judges more discretion to avoid absurd results - JONES V TOWER BOOT
Decided the purpose of the act was to eliminate discrimination and this would not be achieved by using the literal rule.
Advantages of the purposive approach
- Flexibility
- Allows judges to find the purpose of the legislation
- Changes in society - JONES
Disadvantages of the purposive approach
- Risk of judicial law making
- Makes the law uncertain
- Retrospective law making