Non-Fatal Offences Against The Person Flashcards

1
Q

“GBH” mean “really serious harm”

A

DPP v SMITH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A wound requires both layers of skin to be broken

A

MORIARTY v BROOKES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

No matter how serious internal bleeding, not a wound if no skin broken

A

EISENHOWER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Psychiatric harm can be GBH if serious enough

A

R v BURSTOW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MR - s.20 - “Maliciously” do harm - Intention or recklessness to do SOME harm (ABH)

A

R v SAVAGE; R v PARMENTER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ABH = any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with health or comfort of the victim

A

R v MILLER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ABH = Any psychiatric harm if recognised condition

A

R v IRELAND

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Physical Assault

A

Infliction of Unlawful Force Upon Victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Physical Assault - Indirect Infliction - Punching baby’s mother caused her to drop baby was assault on the baby

A

HAYSTEAD v CC of DERBYSHIRE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Simple Assault

A

Acts/Words which Cause V to Apprehend the Immediate Infliction of Unlawful Force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Simple assault can be acts or words

A

R v IRELAND

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Simple assault requires only apprehension of infliction of immediate unlawful personal force

A

FAGAN v MET POLICE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Simple Assault - Only need to fear assault could occur immediately

A

R v BURSTOW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Simple Assualt - A conditional threat is also an assault

A

READ v COKER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Simple Assault - MR - Intention or Recklessness as to V’s apprehension of unlawful personal force

A

R v VENNA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

CPS Charging Standards GBH

A
  • permanent disability
  • loss of sensory function
  • major break
  • big blood loss
  • lengthy treatment/incapacity
17
Q

CPS Charging Standards ABH

A
  • minor cuts (where treatement)
  • extensive bruising
  • temp loss of consciousness
  • minor fractures
  • broken nose
18
Q

Defence - Generally the defence of consent is only when no harm is done or intended

A

COLLINS v WILCOCK

19
Q

Defence - Attorney General Ref 6 of 1980 exceptions to general consent rule

A
  • Sport
  • Surgery
  • Tattooing, Piercing
  • Dangerous exhibition (circus)
20
Q

Defence - Sport within the rules or spirit of the game counts as a form of consent

A

R v BARNES

21
Q

Defence - Tattooing, piercing and circumcision are lawful acts

A

R v BROWN

22
Q

Defence - As per R v BROWN - Consent is invalid if…

A
  • Corrupts young men
  • Spreads disease
  • Excessive level of pain
  • Breeds and glorifies cruelty
23
Q

Defence - No consent if risk of harm is Beyond Merely Transient and Trivial

A

R v EMMETT

24
Q

Defence - Reasonable Chastisement - A parent or person in loco parentis can use reasonable force to discipline a child

A

R v HOPLEY

25
Q

Defence - Duress

A

R v GRAHAM

  1. D subjectively believed he was threatened with death/serious injury (self or another)
  2. (Objective) Person of reasonable firmness of D’s Age/Gender would have given way
26
Q

Defence - Self-defence can be pre-emptive

A

R v BIRD

27
Q

Defence - Discretion in decision-making allowed in the hear of the moment

A

R v PALMER

28
Q

Defence - A person is judged in self-defence on the facts as they honestly (not reasonably) believe them to be

A

R v Williams

29
Q

Defence - Mistake due to voluntary intoxication negatives self-defence

A

R v O’GRADY

not a defence to Basic Intent Crimes - DPP v MAJEWSKI

30
Q

Defence - Mistake due to psychiatric ailment negatives self-defence

A

R v MARTIN