Non-fatal offences against the person Flashcards

1
Q

Common law offences

A

assault and battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

s. 47 OAPA 1861

A

Assault occasioning ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

s. 20 OAPA 1861

A

Wounding/inflicting GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

s. 18 OAPA 1861

A

GBH with intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

s. 23 OAPA 1861

A

Maliciously administering a noxious substance so as to kill/cause GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

s. 24 OAPA 1861

A

Maliciously administering a noxious substance so as to injure, aggrieve or annoy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Crime and Disorder Act 1998

A

Racially or religiously aggravated offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

DPP v PAL

A

Not racially motivated (the victim was Asian) because he would have attacked him anyway, regardless of his race

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

DPP v M

A

words ‘bloody foreigners’ alone established racially aggravated assault even though it was established the argument was about money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fagan v MPC

A

Definition of assault:

any act which, intentionally or recklessly causes another person to APPREHEND IMMEDIATE and unlawful personal violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Wilson

A

“any act” for assault can mean words alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ireland

A

“any act” for assault can mean silence. It is the effect on the victim that is essential here

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Assault vs. battery

A

A - causing fear of punch

B - punch itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lamb

A

There is no assault if the victim doesn’t apprehend the threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Logdon v DPP

A

If V apprehends, it is irrelevant whether D is actually able to carry out the threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Tuberville v Savage

A

Words spoken might negate assault: “If you weren’t so…”

17
Q

Ireland

A

“Immediate” - words alone can create an assault

18
Q

Smith v Chief Superintendent of Woking Police Station

A

“immediate” does not mean instantaneous but imminent - the courts will take into account that V might not be able to think clearly.
HERE: immediate even though D was on the other side of the window

19
Q

Paramenter

A

Mens rea for Assault: Cunningham subjective recklessness applies