NON FATAL OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON Flashcards

1
Q

TYPES OF NON FATAL OFFENCES

A

Common Assault - Battery - ABH -GBH S.20 - GBH S.18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

DEFINITION OF COMMON ASSAULT

A
  • Definition: Any act where D intentionally or recklessly causes V to apprehend immediate and unlawful force.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

MENS REA FOR COMMON ASSAULT

A

Intention or recklessness
(R v Venna [1976]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

COMMON ASSAULT KEY CASES

A

o R v Lamb (1967) – No assault if V does not apprehend harm.

o Logdon v DPP (1976) – If V believes D can carry out the threat, it is assault, even if D lacks actual means.

o R v Ireland & Burstow (1998) – Silent phone calls can amount to assault.

o Tuberville v Savage (1669) – Words can negate an assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DEFINITION OF BATTERY

A

Any act where D intentionally or recklessly applies unlawful force to V.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

MENS REA FOR BATTERY

A

Intention or recklessness
R v Venna [1976].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

KEY POINTS FOR BATTERY

A

o Force includes even minimal contact
(Collins v Wilcock [1984]).

o Touching clothing is sufficient
(R v Thomas [1985]).

o Force can be indirect
(Haystead v DPP [2000] – hitting a baby by punching the mother).

o Omissions may count
(e.g., Fagan v MPC [1986] – D refused to move a car off a police officer’s foot).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

DEFINITION OF Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm (ABH) – s.47 OAPA 1861

A

A common assault or battery that causes actual bodily harm to V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ACTUS REUS FOR ABH

A

o Assault or battery must have occurred.

o Harm must be more than trivial
(R v Miller [1954]).

o Includes psychiatric harm
(R v Chan-Fook [1994]).

o Cutting hair can be ABH
(DPP v Smith [2006]).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

MENS REA FOR ABH

A

o D must have the mens rea for assault or battery.

o No need to intend or foresee ABH
(R v Savage & Parmenter [1992]).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DEFINITION of Malicious Wounding/Inflicting GBH – s.20 OAPA 1861

A

D unlawfully and maliciously wounds or inflicts grievous bodily harm (GBH).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ACTUS REUS FOR GBH s.20

A

o Wound = breaking both layers of skin
(C (a minor) v Eisenhower [1984]).

o GBH = “Really serious harm”
(DPP v Smith [1961]).

o Includes serious psychiatric harm
(R v Burstow [1998]).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MENS REA FOR GBH s.20

A

o D must intend or be reckless as to causing some harm
(R v Cunningham [1957])

o Subjective recklessness applies
(R v Mowatt [1968])

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DEFINITION OF GBH with Intent – s.18 OAPA 1861

A

D unlawfully and maliciously wounds or causes GBH with intent to cause GBH.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ACTUS REUS FOR GBH s.18

A

Same as s.20, but with a higher mental element.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

MENS REA FOR GBH s.18

A

o D must intend to cause GBH, recklessness is not enough.

o Intent can be direct or oblique
(R v Woollin [1998]

17
Q

CONSENT IN NON FATAL OFFENCES

A

-Consent is a defence only for minor assaults (e.g., sports, medical treatment).

  • Cannot consent to serious harm (R v Brown [1993] – sado-masochistic injuries not allowed).
18
Q

EXCEPTIONS FOR CONSENT IN NON FATAL OFFENCES

A

o Contact sports
(R v Barnes [2005])

o Surgery

o Body modifications
(R v Wilson [1996] – branding wife was not unlawful).

19
Q

CAUSATION IN NON FATAL OFFENCES

A
  • Factual causation: “But for” test
    (R v White [1910] – poison not actual cause of death).
  • Legal causation: D’s act must be a significant contribution.
20
Q

INTERVENING ACTS IN NON FATAL OFFENCES

A

o Medical negligence rarely breaks the chain
(R v Cheshire [1991]).

o Victim’s own actions may break the chain if “daft”
(R v Roberts [1971] – jumping from car was foreseeable).