Non- Fatal Offences Flashcards

1
Q

Common assault includes…

A

Assault and battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Act of parliament for common assault

A

S39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Definition of assault

A

Intentionally/ recklessley causing the V to apprehend immediate unlawful violence (Fagen v MPC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

AR of assault

A
  1. Apprehend
  2. Immediate
  3. Unlawful violence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does ‘apprehend’ mean?

A

Causing V to have a general awareness of violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case for apprehend

A

Smith v Supt of Woking Police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does ‘immediate’ mean?

A

The unlawful violence could occur within a reasonable amount of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case for immediate

A

Smith v Supt of Woking Police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

HOW can the V apprehend this unlawful violence?

A

Actions, words, gestures, silent phone calls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Case for causing assault even when the D is joking

A

Logdon v DPP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case for silent phone calls

A

R v Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case for threatening letters

A

R v Constanza

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Case for threatening letters

A

R v Constanza

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does ‘words can nullify an assault’ mean?

A

Cancel the assault out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case for words nullifying an assault

A

Tuberville v Savage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mens rea for assault

A

Intention or recklessness

17
Q

Case for intention

18
Q

Case for recklessness

A

R v Cunningham

19
Q

What is intention?

A

D aims or desires the outcome (R v Mohan)

20
Q

What is recklessness?

A

D realises risk and takes it anyway (R v Cunningham)

21
Q

Act of Parliament for ABH

A

S47 of the Offences Against the Persons Act 1861

22
Q

Define ABH

A

Common assault occasioning actual bodily harm

23
Q

Test 1 for ABH

A

Establish common assault - FULL assault or FULL battery AR

24
Q

Test 2 for ABH

A

Occasioning = causation

25
Causation
1. Factual = ‘but for’ (White) 2. Legal = more than a minimal cause + operating and substantiating cause (Smith)
26
Intervening acts
1. Act of god 2. Medical negligence (Cheshire) 3. Third party (Smith) 4. V’s own actions (Roberts)
27
Test 3 for ABH
AR of ABH
28
AR of ABH
Any hurt/ injury calculated to interfere with V’s health/ comfort (Miller) More than trivial/ less than serious (Chan Fook)
29
Case for psych harm - ABH
Chan Fook
30
Test 4 for ABH
MR
31
MR for ABH
Intent (Mohan) Recklessness (Cunningham)
32
Other rules under MR for ABH
Transferred malice (Latimer/ Mitchell/ Pembilton) Strict liability (Gammon/ Sweet v Parsley) Coincidence rule (Fagen v MPC/ Gammon)
33
Act of Parliament for GBH
S18/ S20 of the Offences Against the Persons Act 1861
34
Definition of GBH
D must unlawfully + maliciously wound or inflict grievous bodily harm.
35
AR of GBH
Wounding (Morairity v Brookes) OR GBH ‘really serious harm’ (DPP v Smith)
36
Case for psych harm - GBH
Burstow
37
MR of S18
Direct intent to cause GBH (Belfon).
38
MR for S20
Intent to cause ‘some harm’ (Mohan). OR Reckless to cause ‘some harm’ (Cunningham).
39
Other rules under MR for GBH
Transferred malice (Latimer/ Mitchell/ Pembilton) Strict liability (Gammon/ Sweet v Parsley) Coincidence rule (Fagen v MPC/ Gammon)