Non Fatal Offences Flashcards
Offences Against the Person Act 1861
- 26,000 prosecutions a year under this act
- BUT; frequent changes and amendments have left the law in an incoherent and confusing state
OAPA 1861 outdated core provisions
- Outdated drafting style
- heirarchy of offences lacks unfiying logical criterion
- Grading of offences is arbitary
- Overlap between offences
- Unecessary degrees of specifics and complexity
- Archaic language and misleading terminology
Basic structure of core offences
a. Assault (common law & S.39 of CJA 88’)
b. Battery (CL & s.39 of CJA 88’)
c. Assault occasioning ABH (s.47 OAPA 1861)
d. Malicious wounding or infliction of GBH (s.20 of OAPA 1861)
e. Intentionally causing GBH (s.18 OAPA 1861)
Assault and Battery (S.39 of CJA 88’) sentence
‘Common assault and battery shall be summary offences and a person guilty of either of them shall be liable to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or to both.’
Difference between assault and battery
Assault = threat
Battery = contact
Assault; communication of threat
- Words alone sufficient/ even silent phone calls suffice (Ireland [1997])
Assault; Imminence
The event must happen very soon
Assault; Unlawful force
- V must apprehend unlawful force
- If V has given valid consent or D uses defensive or preventive force
Assault; Mental element
James LJ [1976] QB 421; “We see no reason in logic or in law why a person who recklessly applies physical force to the person of another, should be outside the criminal law of assault”
MR can be satisfied by intention of recklessness
Battery Definition
“A battery if any intentional touching of another person without the consent of that person and without lawful excuse. it need not necessarily be hostile, or rude, or aggressive….”
Battery; What amounts to touching?
- Touching of clothing (Thomas [1985] Crim LR 677)
- Touching through an object (Fagan v MPC [1969]
- Indirect touching (DPP v K [1990])
Battery; Touching by way of omission
Santana-Bermudez [2004] Crim LR 471
Battery; Everyday touchings defintion
‘A touching acceptable in the ordinary conduct of daily life’ (KD v CC of Hampshire [2005] EWHC 2550)
Why do everyday touching’s not amount to criminal liability?
- Implied consent
- Exception to general rule of liability
Mens rea for battery
The same as for assault. Intention or recklessness, both are interchangeable.
Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm (ABH)
S.47 OAPA 1861; Whoever shall be convicted upon an indictment of any assault occasioning ABH shall be liable…to be imprisoned for any term not exceeding 5 years