Non fatal offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what are the non fatal offences in order from least worst to most worst

A

at the bottom we have common assault–
which is assault and battery
then assault occasioning actual bodily harm
then wounding/inflicting gbh
then gbh with intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe GBH with intent

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Wounding/Inflicting GBH

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Assualt occasioning actual bodily harm

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Common Assualt

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Common Assualt

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

whst case defines assualt describe it

A

RvNelson defines assault as something of a phsycial kind (vocal threat silent phone call,imitating a violent action) that causes someone to think they are going to be struck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

name two other cases other than the main one explaining/giving examples for assault

A

RvConstanna- letters are assault
RvIreland-even silent phone calls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

whats appreheand imediate unlawfal force

A

the victim needs to think that the threat of force is real and possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what happened in r v lamb

A

pointing an unloaded gun at someone who knows the gun is unloaded is not assault, but if the person believed the gun to be loaded, then this is assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what’s battery
use cases

A

battery is the unlawful force tom another either through intention or recklessness
force can be described as the slightest toucing E.G Collins v Wilcock or Wood (Fraser v DPP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

continuing act and indirect act

A

Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner (1968)- the defendant was asked to move his car by a police officer and parked it on his foot. In this case, although the intention was not to hurt the victim , it became the offence of battery once the defendant had realised what he’d done and refused to move

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is an indirect act

A

In an indirect act, the defendant cause force to be applied even though he hasn’t directly applied it himself eg setting a booby trap

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

can common assault be proven as an indirect act- state evidence for this

A

In DPP v K (1990) by way of appeal to the queens bench, it was decided that ‘common assault’ which includes both assault and battery could be committed by an indirect act even if the mens rea of intention is not there. Reckless behaviour is enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

name another case regarding indirect force -regarding a woman and a small child

A

Another case of indirect force occurred in haysted v Cheif Constable of Derbyshire (2000). In punching a woman, leading to a small child falling to the floor, the defendant was found guilty because he was reckless as to wether his actions would injure the child-transferred malice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

give an ommision case example- hint feds

A

DvPP v Santa Bermuez (2003). The policewoman asked D if he had needles in his pocket he said no. when she put her hand in his pocket she was injured by a needle. It was judges that Ds refusal to tell the police officer the truth amounted to an ommision leading to assault casing bodily harm