Non Fatal Offences Flashcards
What is s 18 of the OAPA 1861?
`Grievous bodily harm with intent
What is s 20 of OAPA 1861?
Grievous Bodily Harm
What is s 47 of OAPA 1861?
Actual bodily harm
What is under Common Assault in OAPA 1861?
Assault and Battery
What cases show that assault is ‘causing fear’ in any way through DOING SOMETHING?
Nelson (2013) - assault has to be physically done (not touching though)
Costanza (1997) - letters can be assault
Ireland (1997) - silent phonecalls could be assault
Lamb (1967) - pointing an unloaded gun is only assault if they believe that it is loaded (MR)
DPP v K (1990) - an indirect act can still be battery (e.g. setting a trap)
Which cases show that battery is the application of unlawful force to another either through intention or recklessness?
Thomas (1985) - touching clothes is ‘unlawful force’
Collins v Wilcock (1984) & Wood v DPP (2008) are other battery examples
In waht case was an omission enough to prosecute under OAPA 1861?
Santa-Bermudez (2003) - by failing to warn an officer that they had needles in their pocket, this led to assault causing bodily harm through omission
The use of force does not mean battery if…
- the victim gives genuine consent
- in self defense
- prevention of a crime
What are the max sentences of ABH and GBH?
Both 5 years
Cases to demonstrate ABH
T (2003) - simple outline of ABH Smith (2006) - physical pain doesn't have to be a ingredient of ABH (cutting hair could be too) Chan Fook (1994) - Psychiatric injury can also be ABH
What cases show that the mens rea that is required for ABH is the same as common assault?
Roberts (1971)
Savage (1991)
Cases on what a ‘wound’ is for GBH
Bollom (2004) - significant bruising could be enough
Burstow (1997) - serious psychiatric injury can be GBH
Dica (2004) - infecting people with HIV without them knowing is GBH
What did the House of Lords decide in Parmenter (1991) about the mens rea of s 20 (GBH)?
Although the actus reus of s 20 requires a wound or GBH there is no need for D to foresee this level of serious injury
Mens rea for s 20 vs Mens rea for s 18
s 20 it’s intention or subjective recklessness as to causing some injury (parmenter)
s 18 it’s Specific intention to cause GBH or specific intention to RESIST ARREST plus recklessness as to causing injury (Morrison 1989)
definition of ‘actual bodily harm’
any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort