NMBDs Flashcards
Compare and contrast the mechanisms of action of depolarizing versus non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents, including their effects on neuromuscular transmission and test stimulation patterns.
Depolarizing agents (e.g., suxamethonium) act as agonists that depolarize the neuromuscular junction, causing initial fasciculations followed by a sustained refractory phase (no tetanic fade). Non-depolarizing agents (e.g., atracurium, rocuronium, vecuronium) competitively block the receptor, requiring >75% receptor blockade to abolish contraction, and show a characteristic fade on train-of-four and tetanic stimulation.
Analyze how the rapid hydrolysis of suxamethonium by plasma cholinesterase influences its clinical utility and discuss the potential risks in patients with cholinesterase deficiency.
Suxamethonium’s rapid hydrolysis by plasma cholinesterase affords a very short duration of action, making it ideal for rapid sequence induction. However, in patients with genetic or acquired cholinesterase deficiencies, the metabolism is slowed, leading to prolonged paralysis and an increased risk of complications.
Evaluate the significance of Hofmann elimination in the metabolism of atracurium and how this property impacts its use in patients with renal or hepatic impairment.
Atracurium undergoes Hofmann elimination—a spontaneous, pH and temperature-dependent degradation independent of liver or kidney function—making it especially useful in patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction, as its clearance is predictable and not reliant on organ function.
Discuss how cisatracurium differs from atracurium in terms of isomer composition, side effect profile, and clinical application.
Cisatracurium is the isolated cis-cis isomer of atracurium and produces significantly less histamine release, resulting in fewer cardiovascular and allergic side effects while maintaining similar neuromuscular blocking potency. This makes cisatracurium preferable in patients who are sensitive to histamine-mediated effects.
Assess the implications of mivacurium’s metabolism by plasma cholinesterase on its clinical use, especially in patients with abnormal enzyme activity.
Mivacurium is rapidly metabolized by plasma cholinesterase, leading to a short duration of action suitable for brief procedures. However, in patients with atypical or deficient cholinesterase, the duration of blockade can be unexpectedly prolonged, necessitating careful patient selection and dosing.
Evaluate the cardiovascular effects of pancuronium and explain how its aminosteroid structure contributes to these effects.
Pancuronium, as an aminosteroid, exhibits vagolytic properties that can lead to increases in heart rate, cardiac output, and blood pressure. Its structure interacts with autonomic receptors, making it less suitable for patients with cardiovascular instability.
Critically analyze the pharmacokinetic profile of rocuronium and its implications for rapid sequence induction in anesthesia.
Rocuronium is characterized by a rapid onset (55–90 seconds at higher doses) and intermediate duration of action. Its fast pharmacokinetics make it a favored choice for rapid sequence induction, though clinicians must be mindful of its mild vagal blockade effects on heart rate and blood pressure.
Compare the hemodynamic stability of vecuronium to other non-depolarizing agents and explain the pharmacologic reasons for its profile.
Vecuronium is associated with minimal cardiovascular effects—owing to its intermediate duration, low histamine release, and lack of significant vagolytic activity—making it a preferred agent in patients with cardiac risk compared to agents like pancuronium.
Synthesize the mechanism by which neostigmine reverses non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade and discuss the potential side effects if administered in excess.
Neostigmine works by inhibiting acetylcholinesterase, thereby increasing acetylcholine levels at the neuromuscular junction to outcompete the blocking agents. Excess dosing can lead to cholinergic side effects including bradycardia, bronchoconstriction, increased gastrointestinal motility, and, paradoxically, a depolarizing block if acetylcholine levels become excessively high.
Evaluate the advantages of using sugammadex over traditional anticholinesterases in reversing neuromuscular blockade induced by aminosteroid agents.
Sugammadex encapsulates molecules of aminosteroid neuromuscular blockers (rocuronium, vecuronium), rapidly reducing their free concentration without affecting acetylcholine levels. This offers a rapid, predictable reversal with minimal cholinergic side effects and the ability to re-paralyze if necessary, making it a significant advance over neostigmine.
Differentiate between phase I and phase II blockade following suxamethonium administration and describe the clinical implications of each phase.
Phase I blockade is characterized by sustained depolarization (no tetanic fade, high train-of-four ratio) and is potentiated by anticholinesterases, while phase II blockade resembles a non-depolarizing block (with tetanic fade, post-tetanic facilitation, lower train-of-four ratio). Recognizing the transition is important for appropriate management and reversal strategy.
Analyze how genetic and acquired variations in plasma cholinesterase activity affect the metabolism of drugs like suxamethonium and mivacurium.
Variations in plasma cholinesterase—whether due to genetic deficiency or acquired conditions such as liver disease or pregnancy—can significantly prolong the action of suxamethonium and mivacurium, leading to extended paralysis and necessitating dose adjustments or alternative drug choices.
Case Study: A 55-year-old patient with severe liver cirrhosis requires neuromuscular blockade for surgery. Which neuromuscular blocking agent is most appropriate and why?
In this case, atracurium or cisatracurium would be most appropriate because their metabolism occurs via Hofmann elimination, which is independent of liver function. This avoids prolonged drug action that could occur with agents relying on hepatic metabolism.
Case Study: An anesthesia resident is managing a patient with end-stage renal disease undergoing a short procedure. Which neuromuscular blocker should be chosen, and what factors must be considered?
For a patient with renal failure, agents like atracurium, cisatracurium, or vecuronium are preferable because they are metabolized by Hofmann elimination or hepatic pathways with minimal renal excretion. The decision should consider the desired duration of blockade and the patient’s overall clinical status.
Critically evaluate potential drug interactions that may prolong the effects of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers during anesthesia.
Non-depolarizing agents may be potentiated by concomitant medications such as aminoglycosides, magnesium, certain antibiotics (e.g., tetracyclines), volatile anesthetics, and by conditions like hypothermia. These interactions can extend the duration of neuromuscular blockade, thereby requiring careful monitoring and dose adjustments.
Assess how neuromuscular blocking agents affect cardiovascular parameters and identify which agents are most likely to cause significant hemodynamic changes.
Neuromuscular blockers generally cause paralysis of skeletal muscle, indirectly reducing venous return. However, agents like pancuronium (due to vagolytic effects) and, to a lesser degree, rocuronium, can increase heart rate and blood pressure, while agents like vecuronium and cisatracurium have minimal cardiovascular impact.
Discuss the respiratory effects of neuromuscular blockers and outline strategies to mitigate associated risks during anesthesia.
All neuromuscular blockers cause respiratory muscle paralysis necessitating controlled ventilation. Agents that release histamine (e.g., atracurium) may also induce bronchospasm. Strategies include vigilant respiratory monitoring, readiness for mechanical ventilation, and choosing agents with minimal histamine release in susceptible patients.
Examine the pharmacological innovation of sugammadex and its impact on anesthesia practice, focusing on reversal safety and efficacy.
Sugammadex offers a novel mechanism by directly encapsulating aminosteroid blockers (rocuronium and vecuronium), leading to rapid and effective reversal of neuromuscular blockade without increasing acetylcholine levels. This innovation enhances safety, especially in emergencies, though its renal elimination and cost considerations must be factored in.
Case Study: An anesthesia resident encounters prolonged neuromuscular blockade after administering suxamethonium in a patient later found to have pseudocholinesterase deficiency. Explain the underlying mechanism and the appropriate management strategy.
The prolonged blockade is due to reduced plasma cholinesterase activity, slowing the hydrolysis of suxamethonium. Management involves supportive care with mechanical ventilation until spontaneous recovery, careful monitoring, and avoidance of further neuromuscular blockers until enzyme levels are reassessed.
Create an integrated outline that maps the metabolism, elimination pathways, and potential side effects of neuromuscular blocking agents, and evaluate how this framework guides clinical decision-making.
An effective outline would begin with the classification of agents (depolarizing vs. non-depolarizing), then detail their metabolism (Hofmann elimination for atracurium/cisatracurium; plasma cholinesterase for suxamethonium and mivacurium; hepatic metabolism for aminosteroids), followed by elimination routes and associated side effects (histamine release, cardiovascular and respiratory effects). This integrated framework assists clinicians in selecting the appropriate agent based on patient comorbidities, organ function, and surgical duration.
Front
Back
Classify suxamethonium and explain its mechanism of action.
Depolarizing NMBD; mimics ACh, binds to nicotinic receptors → sustained depolarization → Phase I block (no fade on nerve stimulation).
Compare the metabolism of atracurium vs. cisatracurium.
Both undergo Hofmann degradation. Atracurium: also ester hydrolysis. Cisatracurium: no ester hydrolysis; does not release histamine.
Which NMBDs are contraindicated in renal failure, and why?
Tubocurarine (excreted renally), pancuronium (active metabolites). Exceptions: Atracurium/cisatracurium (Hofmann degradation).
Design a reversal protocol for rocuronium-induced blockade.
- Confirm ≥2 TOF twitches. 2. Administer sugammadex (encapsulates rocuronium). Avoid anticholinesterases for aminosteroids.
Why is edrophonium unsuitable for routine NMBD reversal?
Short duration (minutes) → risk of re-paralysis. Used diagnostically (e.g., myasthenia gravis).
List three conditions where suxamethonium is absolutely contraindicated.
- Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. 2. Major burns (days 9-60). 3. Muscular dystrophies.
Explain why mivacurium’s duration is prolonged in atypical plasma cholinesterase.
Mivacurium is metabolized by plasma cholinesterase; enzyme deficiency → delayed hydrolysis → prolonged block.
Match the NMBD to its side effect: Pancuronium → Tachycardia; Mivacurium → Hypotension; Suxamethonium → Hyperkalemia.
Correct. Pancuronium: sympathomimetic effects. Mivacurium: histamine release. Suxamethonium: K+ release.
Which anticholinesterase crosses the blood-brain barrier, and what are its implications?
Physostigmine. Can treat central anticholinergic syndrome but causes CNS side effects (e.g., seizures).
Analyze the risk of using suxamethonium in a penetrating eye injury.
Raises intraocular pressure → risk of vitreous expulsion. Balance against aspiration risk during RSI.
Which NMBD has the fastest onset among non-depolarizing agents?
Rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg → intubation in 60-90 sec).
Identify the storage requirement for suxamethonium and its rationale.
4°C to prevent hydrolysis (degradation at room temperature).
Compare the histamine-releasing potential of benzylisoquinolinium vs. aminosteroid NMBDs.
Benzylisoquinolinium (e.g., atracurium, mivacurium) → high histamine release. Aminosteroids (e.g., rocuronium) → minimal.
Create a case study where cisatracurium is preferred over atracurium.
Patient with asthma/history of anaphylaxis: cisatracurium avoids histamine release.
Which NMBD is safest in hepatic failure?
Atracurium/cisatracurium (Hofmann degradation, independent of liver function).
Explain the significance of ‘post-tetanic facilitation’ in non-depolarizing block.
Increased ACh release after tetanic stimulation → transient reversal of fade → diagnostic of non-depolarizing blockade.
Why must antimuscarinics co-administer with neostigmine?
Neostigmine ↑ ACh → muscarinic effects (bradycardia, secretions). Glycopyrrolate/atropine blocks these.
Which NMBD is associated with the highest anaphylaxis risk?
Suxamethonium (>50% of NMBD-related anaphylaxis).
Group the following by duration: Mivacurium (short), Vecuronium (intermediate), Pancuronium (long).
Correct. Mivacurium: 10-20 min. Vecuronium: 20-30 min. Pancuronium: 40-60 min (Table 1).
Describe sugammadex’s mechanism and clinical advantage.
Cyclodextrin encapsulates rocuronium/vecuronium → rapid reversal (even deep block). No muscarinic side effects.
What defines a Phase II block with suxamethonium?
Prolonged exposure → desensitization → non-depolarizing-like block (fade on TOF, post-tetanic facilitation).
Which NMBD is hydrolyzed by plasma cholinesterase?
Suxamethonium and mivacurium.
Identify a key difference between neostigmine and pyridostigmine.
Neostigmine: faster onset (2-5 min), shorter duration. Pyridostigmine: slower onset, longer action (hours).
Which patient population requires dose adjustment for vecuronium?
Hepatic/renal impairment (metabolized in liver, excreted in bile/urine).
Justify the use of rocuronium over suxamethonium in elective surgery.
Avoids suxamethonium’s side effects (hyperkalemia, myalgia). Rocuronium’s rapid onset suffices with sugammadex reversal.
