NINJA AUD - Performing Audit Procedures and Evaluating Evidence Flashcards
An auditor MOST likely would perform substantive tests of details when:
analytical procedures indicate unusual fluctuations.
F/S assertion for allowance for doubtful accounts?
valuation and allocation.
*Auditor would review aging of receivables to assess the reasonableness of the bad debt adjustment by the client -> affect allowance for bad debts account balance and thus, the NRV of receivables.
An auditor uses the knowledge provided by the understanding of internal control and the final assessed level of control risk primarily to determine the nature, timing, and extent of the:
substantive tests.
In order to disclose differences from expectations in income statement accounts (more than B/S accts), the auditor would perform:
analytical procedures.
If the assessed level of inherent and control risk are high…
the auditor would NOT rely on records. Rather, the auditor would request the client to schedule the physical inventory count (for example) at the end of the year.
Audit evidence about control risk is obtained by performing tests of controls that evaluate the effectiveness of specific controls. Methods of determining the effectiveness of the design and operation of a control include:
Inquiry, inspection, observation, and reperformance.
The element of the audit planning process most likely to be agreed upon with the client before implementation of the audit strategy is:
the determination of the timing of inventory observation procedures to be performed.
The objective of a dual-purpose test of details of transactions performed as tests of controls is to:
evaluate whether controls operated effectively.
Regardless of the assessed risk of material misstatement, an auditor would perform:
substantive tests to restrict detection risk for significant transaction classes.
If an auditor concludes that there is a high risk of material misstatement:
the auditor may expand substantive testing or select more effective substantive tests.
In reviewing accounting estimates prepared by management, the auditor should:
perform retrospective review of prior-period estimates to determine a possible bias.
risk of assessing control risk too low is:
the risk that the assessed level of control risk based on the sample is less than the true operating effectiveness of the control.
Auditor concluded that performing only substantive procedures for specific relevant assertions and risk is appropriate because:
the auditor’s risk assessment procedures have not identified any effective controls relevant to the assertion.
To verify that a voucher is submitted and paid only once…
a system must be in place that cancels the voucher (i.e. stamping “paid”)
When the auditor will falsely place too much reliance on the internal control and will not collect enough evidence.
Assessing control risk too low.
In a test of controls, sample size varies inversely with:
the tolerable (or maximum) rate of deviation.
As the number of allowable deviations increases, the sample size decreases. Sample size increases as the expected population deviation rate increases.
Accounting for unused prenumbered purchases and receiving reports would violate segregation of duties because…
a vouchers payable clerk could write a fake purchase order, confirm receipt of the nonexistent goods, and then authorize payment to him or herself.
The lower the assessed level of control risk…
The fewer substantive tests that will be needed.
An auditor who plans to assess control risk at a low level…
usually performs tests of controls and only limited tests of details or substantive tests.
In assessing control risk, an auditor selects from a variety of techniques, including:
reperformance and observation.
Recalculation, comparison, confirmation, and verification are all substantive tests or tests of details of transactions.
Major reasons for maintaining an audit trail for a computer system include:
deterrent to fraud, monitoring purposes, and query answering.
An auditor would favor interim testing if:
- the assessed RMM is low,
- the controls are strong,
- the auditor can reduce the risk that misstatements that exist at the period-end are not detected by performing appropriate procedures,
- GAAS does not require testing at the balance sheet.
increase assessed level of control risk.
decrease detection risk, increase extent of tests of details.
assessing control risk too low and decrease substantive testing because:
the true deviation rate in the population was more than the deviation rate in the auditor’s sample.
The auditor needs to modify the planned assessed level of control risk when:
the sample deviation rate plus the allowance for sampling risks exceeds the tolerable rate.
The sampling unit in a test of controls pertaining to the existence of payroll transactions ordinarily is:
a payroll register entry.