NICE guideline - inducing labour - 2021 Flashcards
What is the cumulative proportion of spontaneous labours that start before 37 weeks
7.7%
What is the cumulative proportion of spontaneous labours that start before 40 weeks
50.3%
What is the cumulative proportion of spontaneous labours that start before 41/40
82.8%
What is the cumulative proportion of spontaneous labours that start before 41+6
99%
What are the risks associated with a pregnancy continuing beyond 41 weeks
Increased likelihood of:
Caesarean birth
admission to NICU
stillbirth and neonatal death
How should women be counselled regarding IOL at 41 weeks
IOL may reduce the risks but that they will also need to consider the impact of the induction on their birth experience.
If women continue pregnancy beyond 42 weeks and wish to have monitoring they should be advised:
Monitoring only provides a snapshot and cannot reliably predict changes after monitoring ends
Adverse events inc. stillbirth cannot be predicted reliably or even prevented with monitoring
Monitoring might consist of twice weekly CTG and US estimation of LV
In PPROM before 34/40 without additional obstetric indications when should expectant management be offered until
37/40
If a woman has PPROM after 34/40 but before 37/40 discuss the options of
Expectant management until 37 weeks or induction of labour.
If a woman has PPROM after 34/40 but before 37/40. when discussing options of IOL or expectant management take into consideration the following:
- Risks to the women (sepsis, need for LSCS)
- Risk to the baby (sepsis, prematurity)
- local availability of neonatal intensive care facilities
- the woman’s individual circumstances and preferences
If a woman has PPROM after 34 weeks and has positive GBS at any time in their current pregnancy offer
Immediate IOL or caesarean birth
Prelabour rupture of membranes at or after 37 weeks. Offer
- expectant management for 24hours, or
- IOL asap
For those who choose expectant management
offer IOL after 24hours if labour not started naturally
Discussions re IOL with previous caesarean should cover
Increased risk of emergency CS
Risk of uterine rupture
Suitability of mechanical methods including infection
propess not licensed for IOL in those with uterine scar
Risks and consequences of caesarean birth
Should IOL be offered if there is FGR with confirmed fetal compromise?
Caesarean birth should be offered instead
what does the evidence show regarding benefits of IOL in women with fetal macrosomia without diabetes
There is uncertainty about the benefits of IOL compared to expectant management, but:
- IOL risk of shoulder dystocia is reduced
- IOL risk of 3rd or 4th degree tears is increased
- no difference in risk of perinatal death, BPI or need for EMCS