New York tort distinctions Flashcards
NY INTENTIONAL TORT: In the state of New York, a prima facie tort consists of intentional infliction of pecuniary harm without justification. What are its 2 elements?
- The intent to do harm per (different from intent to do other intentional torts which only require the intent to do the act which causes harm).
- Plaintiff alleges and proves special damages, that is pecuniary loss.
NY Defense to intentional tort: New York requires RETREAT unless 1 of 4 things is true of actor?
- Cannot do so safely
- Is in his own dwelling
- Is police officer
4 is assisting police officer
NY LIBEL: Distinction between a libel per se and libel per quod (libel by “extrinsic fact”): libel by an extrinsic fact is treated like libel per se (actionable without proof of special damages) so long as that libel falls into a category that constitutes what?
Libel by an extrinsic fact is treated like libel per se so long as that libel falls into a category that constitutes SLANDER PER SE.
If the statement is defamatory on its face and in one of the slander per se categories, are special damages required to be proved by the plaintiff: 1. For libel? 2. For slander?
- Not required for libel
2. Not required for slander
If the statement is defamatory on its face and NOT in one of the slander per se categories, are special damages required to be proved by the plaintiff: 1. For libel? 2. For slander?
- Not required for libel
2. Yes, required for slander
If the statement is defamatory only by extrinsic fact and in one of the slander per se categories, are special damages required to be proved by the plaintiff: 1. For libel? 2. For slander?
- Not required for libel
2. Yes, required for slander
If the statement is defamatory only by extrinsic fact and NOT in one of the slander per se categories, are special damages required to be proved by the plaintiff: 1. For libel? 2. For slander?
1 yes, required for libel
2. Yes, required for slander
Is there a New York “common-law” right of privacy? Is there a New York common-law protection for one’s name or picture?
There is no New York common-law right of privacy, but there is a STATUTORY protection for one’s picture or name. The action survives death and may be commenced or continued by the estate. Does not apply to business entities.
There are 3 New York defenses to the statutory protection afforded to one’s picture or name. What are those 3 defenses?
- Prior written consent
- The photographer exhibiting his work absent objection
- Goods or art that have been sold with the person’s name, picture, or portrait thereon
Under New York law, for negligent misrepresentation, before a defendant is liable to NON-contractual parties relying on the misrepresentation, the following 3 elements must be shown
- Awareness that the representation was the to be used for a specific purpose
- Reliance by a known party in furtherance of the purpose
- Defendants conduct demonstrates understanding of the reliance
Does New York recognize wrongful birth as a cause of action?
New York does not recognize this cause of action
A professional does not have a duty to disclose the risk of treatment if he has the following 4 defenses, which are New York specific
- The risk is TOO COMMONLY KNOWN to warrant disclosure
2 patient indicated he would undergo treatment REGARDLESS OF RISK - Consent was NOT REASONABLY POSSIBLE
- Dr. reasonably believed that disclosure of risk would adversely and substantially AFFECT PATIENT’S CONDITION
Under New York law, does the status of the plaintiff on the premises determine the duty owed to the plaintiff?
NO. New York employees a uniform standard of REASONABLE CARE under the circumstances with respect to injuries on land.
Under New York State law, a violation of which of the following constitutes negligence per se: 1. A state statute? 2. A regulation or local ordinance?
But breach of a regulation or local ordinance is only some evidence.
Under New York law, the duty regarding negligent infliction of emotional distress is narrowly interpreted. The plaintiff must be within 1 what?
2 if plaintiff’s distress is caused by threat of physical impact the threat must be directed at the plaintiff or who and in what circumstances?
- The plaintiff must be within “the zone of danger”
- If case is predicated on threat of physical impact, the threat must be directed at plaintiff or IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER in her presence (i.e. in the zone of danger of physical injury). No nonfamily member can recover.