New Monetarism/New Classical/Rational Expectations Flashcards

1
Q

How does the new model, in general, explain quantity adjustments after a shock?

A

A surprise-shock will cause an interaction between expectations and search resulting in changes in Y and UN. This is because workers don’t know which companies are paying what or have perfect knowledge of the price level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What role does the reservation wage have in Search Behavior?

A

Each employee has a certain wage they won’t say no to, and they search until they find that wage. Higher reservation wage leads to longer search times.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What influences Search Behavior?

A

Subsidies to Searching (Un ↑, Y ↓), Anticipated Inflation (No impact), Unanticipated Inflation (UN ↓, Y↑).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Adaptive v Rational Expectations

A

Adaptive expectations are based on what is going on now. Rational expectations use all info to correctly, on average, predict inflation based on the correct model of the econ. (rational expectations are a dumb assumption).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

On Average, for an anticipated shock what happens?

A

Anticipated shocks in either direction have no effect because the model is the same as the old model in the case that things are anticipated. When people can expect more inflation, their reservation wage increases and everything stays the same.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

On average, what happens for an inflationary, unanticipated shock?

A

Supply increases temporarily because workers get fooled. Eventually, they learn of their deception and return to normal. Initial increase occurs because workers think that the higher nominal wages they are seeing are higher real wages, but they are not. Workers take more jobs when searching because they don’t know any better.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

On average, what happens for a deflationary, unanticipated shock?

A

Employers lower nominal wages (though real wage stays the same), so workers quit in order to go searching, however, they cannot find anything because all jobs are paying less.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How do the results of surprise shocks create the Phillips curve?

A

Because at higher inflation, there is lower UN. At lower inflation, there is higher UN. Yay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a critique of the deflationary shock results?

A

In an economic downturn, it is unlikely that people will be quitting their jobs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What about anticipated, but not average, cases?

A

If people have too low of expectations, then there will be a temporary expansion. Vice Versa. These shocks are not as big though.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does this new Monetarism/Rational Expectations ideology lead to an even stronger critique of policy?

A

Because anticipated policies are useless when correctly anticipated, but in non-average cases the could produce either a contraction or an expansion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Real Business Cycle Theory

A

S-Side theory of cycles that is based on random shocks to growth factors (which influence productivity). What is a random shock? It is a nebulous idea. This theory is bad empirically because it based on flawed assumptions about what people do with an increase in productivity (taxi example).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Real Business Cycle Theory do to the Phillips curve?

A

There are multiple vertical Phillips curves depending on the random shocks that occur. As a result of changes in production, people engage in “consumption smoothing.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What competing effects undermine the “Incentive to Work” behind supply-side tax cuts?

A

Substitution and Income effects. Can’t decide in theory but in practice it seems that the income effect dominates, dealing a blow to S-side tax cuts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Substitution effect:

A

When there is a change in relative price, we buy more of the cheaper good. Therefore if wages increase, leisure becomes more expensive compared to buying stuff. So we buy stuff and work more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Income effect:

A

When we are richer, we buy more of all goods. Therefore, at a higher wage, we are likely to buy more leisure (work less) and more stuff.

17
Q

How is the “Incentive to Save” damaged by real life?

A

Tax cuts on earned interest make any dollar saved today able to buy more in the future. This makes future consumption cheaper (sub effect), so theoretically we should do more saving for the future. However, if we make more money on interest, then we will probably just buy more today (income effect) and save less.

18
Q

Is the “incentive to invest” equally damaged as the other incentives?

A

Any tax cut to Investment should make firms do more of it, however, they could also use the extra profits to buy back shares. If they have bad expectations then they will not be investing anyways. Empirically (the 80s are a good example) firms don’t really respond to tax incentives to invest.

19
Q

What is bad about higher inflation according to Milton Friedman and which readings support this?

A

Higher rates of inflation are more variable. Variable rates reduce certainty and make the economy function less efficiently. Friedman, Inflation and Unemployment.