New Crim

Question 1

Words alone not enough for voluntary manslaughter adequate provocation

Answer 1

GIOUARD

Question 2

Explicit Malice Murder

Answer 2

Expressed intent = Explicit Malice (Taylor) Intentional wickedness

Question 3

Voluntary Act Common law

Answer 3

Utter

Question 4

Omission

Answer 4

Pestikas

Question 5

Bystander liability

Answer 5

Davis - if they encouraged or aided and abetted liable

Question 6

Mens Rea: Purpose

Answer 6

US v Bailey (Left jail for different purpose)

Question 7

Mens Rea: Knowledge

Answer 7

REHAIF

Question 8

Willful Blindness / Knowledge as practical certainty

Answer 8

JEWELL

Question 9

Victims act breaks causal chain

Answer 9

SMITH

Question 10

Vagueness Doctrine

Answer 10

MORALES
1. No notice on law aka Not published or not explicitly clear to individual 2. Too much discretion to police
MORALES CASE

Question 11

Ambiguous Statute (Multiple meanings)

Answer 11

BELL CASE - RULE OF LENITY APPLYS LAW IN D’s FAVOR

Question 12

RETROACTIVITY

Answer 12

ROGERS - After the fact

Question 13

WRITTEN STATUTE REQUIREMENT

Answer 13

STATE V STREET

Question 14

CAN USE COMMON LAW TO INTERPRET STATUTE

Answer 14

LEWIS

Question 15

Innocent until proven guilty

Answer 15

OWENS

Question 16

CUSTODY IS NOT POSSESSION FOR EMBEZZLEMENT SO IF YOU TAKE IT ITS LARCENY

Answer 16

MACNAS

Question 17

OVERT ACT FOR CONSPIRACY

Answer 17

Shabani

Question 18

ABANDON CONSPIRACY

Answer 18

NEE - IM OUT YALL OR SNITCH

Question 19

CONSPIRACY AGREEMENT

Answer 19

PACHEO - CAN BE UNI OR BILATERAL

Question 20

SPECIFIC INTENT FOR CONSPIRACY

Answer 20

VALLE - intend to Agree 2 crime