neurological exam Flashcards

1
Q

objective assessment

A
Your initial observation …….other considerations
Posture?
Motor function present/absent?
Sensory function
Transfers – level of assistance?
Gait 
Function
Vision, Speech, Swallow
Comprehension/Higher function
Skin condition
Colour
Wasting
Joint instability
Contracture
Deformity
Trick movements
Tremor

Perception – ability to follow instructions
Facial palsy – weakness one side of face
Drooling – poor orofacial control
Presence of NG or Peg tube – implications?
Urinary catheter – what does this mean?
Assistive devices – splints or use of mobility aid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Posture

A
POSTURE 
Is it normal ?
What is alignment of head trunk limbs?
Is there symmetry between R & L?
Contracture - present, where?
Spastic patterns?
Presence of abnormal postures?
Can be found after stroke, head injury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Motor system - movement assessment

A
Movement Assessment*
Screen UL, LL, Trunk active movements
What is the quality of movement?
Range of movement - active/passive?
Is there loss of ROM? Why?
Abnormal movement? Why?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

motor system - abnormal movement

A

Abnormal movement
Loss of co-ordination - cerebellar lesion
Bradykinesia - Parkinson’s disease (slowed movement)
Involuntary movement - tremor / chorea (brief, involuntary, non-rhythmic movements)
Intention tremor - cerebellar
Non-intention tremor - Parkinson’s
Loss of range - contracture
Loss of voluntary movement UMNL, CVA.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

lower motor neuron

Upper motor neuron

A

Lower motor neuron: A neuron whose cell body lies in the central nervous system, and whose axon leaves the CNS through a foramen, and terminates on an effector.

 Upper motor neuron: A neuron which lies entirely within the CNS and causes movement because it terminates on a lower motor neuron.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Motor system - POWER

A

Muscle Power Assessment
Resisted movement joint ranges

Upper & Lower limb

Grading - 	Oxford Scale	
			0 No movement
			1 Flicker
			2 Movement no gravity
			3 Movement & gravity
			4 Movement & gravity & resistance
			5 Normal

Myotomes - Upper & Lower limb - REVISE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

motor system - abnormal muscle power - weakness

A
Abnormal Muscle Power (Weakness)
Muscle pathology
Neuromuscular junction defect
Central - UMNL
Anterior horn cell damage/pathology
Nerve root injury
Nerve plexus
Peripheral – Peripheral nerve lesion (PNL)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

motor system - TONE

muscle tone assessment procedure

A

Muscle Tone Assessment Procedure
Assessment Steps (position supine lying)
1. OBSERVE Appearance of limb
2. Palpation / Feel muscle
How does it react to stretch PROM – UL, LL, Trunk
3. PROM; Proximal to distal direction for test

Grading Ashworth Scale or Modified Ashworth* see handout VLE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ashworth scale

A
  1. No increase in muscle tone.
  2. Slight increase in muscle tone - manifested by a catch & release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of movement when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion/extension.

1+Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance through the remainder (less than half) of the range of movement.

  1. More marked increase in tone through most of the range of movement but affected part(s) easily moved.
  2. Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult.
  3. Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

assessment of motor system, findings

A

Abnormal Muscle Tone
Normal tone
Increased tone
Resistance  suddenly - spasticity / clasp knife
Resistance through range - lead pipe rigidity
Intermittent resistance through range - cogwheel
Decreased tone
Loss of resistance through range hypotonia/flaccid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

decorticate vs decerebrate rigidity

A

Both are primitive behaviour responses to brain injury.
Decorticate posturing, the hands or arms are posturing towards the spine (inward), which is a primitive protective response.
Decerebrate posturing the hands are directed away from the body or spine, which is no attempt to guard the body at all.
Usually, decerebrate posturing indicates more extensive brain damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

decorticate rigidity

A
Lesion at a higher level
 extensor tone LL  flexor tone UL
Pattern UL
Flexion and internal rotation
Pattern LL
Extended - Adducted - Internally rotated - Feet plantarflexed and inverted.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

decerebrate rigidity

A

Lesion at midbrain
 extensor tone 4 limbs
Trunk – Opisthotonus (severe hyperextension & spasticity).
Pattern UL
Extension - Internal rotation - Wrist flexion
Pattern LL
Extended - Adducted - Internally rotated - Feet plantarflexed and inverted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

motor system - reflexes

A
Reflexes*
Upper limb
Biceps C5,6
Triceps C6,7
Supinator C5,6

Lower limb
Knee jerk L2,3,4
Ankle L5,S1
Plantar (Babinski sign)

Grading
- diminished
\+ Normal
\++ Brisk responses
\+++ Clonus (rhythmic oscillations)

Reinforcement
Jendrassik’s manoeuvre
(patient flexes both sets of fingers into a hook-like form and interlocks those sets of fingers together. The patellar reflex is elicited, whilst in this manoeuvre. The elicited response is compared with the reflex result of the same action when the manoeuvre is not in use. Often a larger reflex response will be observed when the patient is occupied with the maneuver, as the maneuver may prevent the patient from consciously inhibiting or influencing his or her response to the hammer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

abnormal reflexes - plantar reflex

A

Abnormal Reflexes (Plantar reflex)
Toes flex - reflexor plantar response - normal/negative Babinski’s sign.
Hallux extends, toes spread - extensor plantar response- positive Babinski’s sign. Indicates – UMNL.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

objective assessment 0 sensory system

A
cutaneous sensations 
pain/pinprick 
temp 
light touch 
pressure 
2 point discrimination 

proprioceptive sensations
vibrations
joint position sense
movement

integrative sensation
bilateral simultaneous
sensory appreciation
stereognosis

17
Q

posterior column - medial leminiscal pathways

A

Conveys:
Proprioception (awareness of position of muscles, tendons, joints & body movements).
Fine discriminative touch (ability to feel exactly which part of body is being touched).
Stereognosis (ability to recognise by feel the size,shape and texture of an object).
Vibration sense.
Weight discrimination (ability to determine the weight of an object).

18
Q

anterolateral pathways

A
Including spinothalamic tract (anterior & lateral) and other associated tracts that convey:
Pain
Temperature sense (hot / cold)
Crude touch (poorly localised) touch
Pressure
Tickle
Itch
Primary Sensation
Light touch - cotton wool 
Temperature
Pinprick / pain
Vibration sense
Joint position sense
2 point discrimination
Dermatomes
Sensory Testing Instructions
Clear instructions / demonstration
What you need?
Light touch - cotton wool
Vibration - tuning fork
Pinprick - neurotips
Temperature - test-tubes hot / cold
Find level of normality
Test both sides
sharp-blunt assess with neurotips
19
Q

sensory system

A

Joint Position Sense
Upper limb
Patients eyes open demonstrate.
Hold distal phalanx DIP joint index finger .
Illustrate bent & straight.
Patient closes eyes & is asked to report if joint is bent or straight.
Test distal joints first.

Lower limb
As above DIP joint, test hallux.

higher order sensationGraphesthesia - ability to recognize writing on the skin purely by the sensation of touch.
Stereognosis/tactile gnosis - ability to perceive & recognise the form of an object using cues from texture, size, spatial properties, and temperature (mediated by the posterior column-medial lemniscus pathway). Stereognosis tests determine whether or not the parietal lobe of the brain is intact.
Sensory inattention /sensory neglect - patient recognises stimuli when presented independently but recognises only one side when stimulus is presented simultaneously. Indicates Parietal lobe lesion.
The above cannot be tested unless primary sensation intact bilaterally.

20
Q

upper limb coordination

A

Finger-tip to nose test
Hold finger at arms length in front of patient. Ask patient to touch the finger with index finger then touch their nose. Change speed/position of target.
Repeated movements

21
Q

lower limb coordination

A

Heel to shin test

Patient in supine. Lift leg and place heel on knee. Slide heel down along shin.

22
Q

trunk coordination

A

tandem walking

23
Q

rapid pronation/suppination

A

Dysdiadokokenesis

Rapid alternating pronation / suppination

24
Q

functional mobility

A
Balance
Sitting balance
Standing balance
Static, dynamic, functional
Bed mobility
Rolling
Lying to sitting
Sitting to standing
Transfers
What is the level of assistance? 
What pattern of movement did you see?
Balance 
Base of support?
Stability?
25
Q

balance test

A

Balance
Sitting - static / dynamic / functional
Standing - static / dynamic / functional
Righting and equilibrium reactions

Other - base of support / posture
Challenging - sensory / visual components
Balance tests

26
Q

rhomberg test

A
Rhomberg Test
Patient stands with feet together 
Reassure
If patient is falling discontinue
If not proceed hold position with eyes open and closed

Interpretation
Unsteady eyes closed - sensory ataxia
Unsteady eyes open + closed

27
Q

gait assessment

A
Appropriately undressed
Starting position
Initiation of gait
Level of assistance
Use of aid/device
Alignment
Stability
Base of support
Swing phase
Stance phase
Arm swing
Trunk rotation
Foot placement/clearance
Timing/co-ordination
28
Q

abnormal gait

A
Hemiplegic
Parkinsonian
Ataxic: sensory or cerebellar (lack of voluntary co-ordination).
High stepping
Trendellenburg
29
Q

speech language and swallow

A

Dysphasia - partial or complete impairment of the ability to communicate resulting from brain injury.
Expressive / Receptive / Global
Dysarthria - is a motor speech disorder characterised by poor articulation, it is a condition in which problems occur with the muscles that help one talk; this makes it very difficult to pronounce words.
Dysphonia - disorders of the voice: an impairment in the ability to produce voice sounds using the vocal organs (it is distinct from dysarthria which means disorders of speech, that is, an impairment in the ability to produce spoken words).
Dysphagia - swallow impairment.

Broca’s Area
Inferior frontal gyrus of dominant hemisphere (usually the left)
Associated with motor or expressive dysphasia
Wernicke’s Area
Temporal lobe
Sensory or receptive dysphasia

30
Q

vision

A

visual field defect

visual inattention

31
Q

cranial nerve exam

A
I Olfactory
II Optic
III Oculomotor
IV Trochlear
V Trigeminal
VI Abducens
VII Facial
VIII Vestibulocochlear
IX Glossopharyngeal
X Vagus
XI Accessory
XII Hypoglossal
32
Q

glasgow coma scale

A
Total possible score: 15
Minimal score: 3
GCS <9 severe brain injury
GCS 9-12 moderate brain injury (controversial)
GCS ≥13 minor brain injury
33
Q

AMTS - irish version

A
Score 1 point for each question answered correctly
1		Age of the patient
2		Time to nearest hour
3		Address given for recall at the end of test  - ‘42 West 	Street’. 
4		Name of hospital
5		Year
6		Date of birth of patient
7		Month
8		Year of the First World War (1914)
9		Name of President of Ireland 
10	Count backwards from 20 to 1
34
Q

concluding neurological exam

A

Fitting the information into the POMR framework
Decide on the patient’s problem list
Goal setting short and long term, with timelines?
What is the treatment plan, specific to problems?

Will you use outcome measures?
Other considerations e.g. video gait?