Neuroimaging in Pain Flashcards

1
Q

What is the specificity hypothesis in the context of pain, and who proposed it?

A
  • René Descartes in 1664
  • Specificity hypothesis of pain = suggested that pain is specific sensation that occurs independently of other sensory modalities & that there are specific receptors for pain
  • theory primarily focused on peripheral input w/o much emphasis on the role of the brain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is episodic analgesia, and how does it challenge the specificity hypothesis?

A
  • where injury occurs without the experience of pain (indicates brain prioritizes survival over pain perception)
  • it demonstrates that pain does not always correlate directly with injury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does the concept of congenital analgesia challenge the specificity hypothesis?

A
  • refers to individuals who are genetically born without the ability to feel pain
  • challenges specificity hypothesis bc pain is considered a protective mechanism necessary for survival. If pain were a specific, peripheral response as suggested by the specificity hypothesis, individuals with congenital analgesia shouldn’t exist.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is phantom limb pain, and how does it challenge the specificity hypothesis?

A
  • individuals experience pain in limb that has been amputated (there is no actual injury in the affected area)
  • challenges specificity hypothesis bc shows that pain can occur w/o associated peripheral injury, indicating that brain plays significant role in pain perception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the current definition of pain according to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP)?

A
  • an unpleasant sensory & emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or such described in terms of such damage” (IASP 1994).
  • definition acknowledges both bottom-up & top-down influences on pain perception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the research goals related to the understanding of pain?

A
  • To understand how cognitive and affective states can alter the response to nociceptive input.
  • To understand who is capable of using these mechanisms to cope successfully with pain.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) work as a medical imaging technique?

A
  • a medical imaging technique that uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to create images of the body
  • works by taking advantage of the different magnetic properties of various biological substances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What can be inferred from the presence of oxygenated blood in MRI images, and how does it relate to studying brain activity?

A
  • Areas w/ more oxygenated blood in MRI images indicate activity in those areas
  • can deduce info about time course of oxygenated blood, allowing them to account for a short delay after a stimulus is presented
  • can help map regions of brain activated in response to stimuli - often referred to as BOLD (Blood Oxygen Level Dependent) response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does MRI use voxel-based analysis to study brain activity?

A
  • MRI divides the brain into voxels each containing a BOLD signal
  • Researchers model the stimulus-induced change in the signal and then search for voxels with signals that match the predicted response model
  • good match implies activation in relation to the stimulus
  • different tissues with varying fat-to-water ratios contribute to contrasts observed in MRI imaging
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can the magnetic field be manipulated to optimize sensitivity to the contrast of interest in fMRI?

A
  • By adjusting the parameters of the magnetic field
  • they can enhance the ability to detect and visualize specific contrasts in brain activity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the typical resolution of fMRI, and what is the minimum duration of a stimulus for effective fMRI analysis?

A
  • fMRI measures brain activity with a resolution of about 1mm.
  • at least 2 seconds to capture meaningful data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why are mock scanners used in fMRI studies, and what is their purpose?

A
  • used to help patients or participants become familiar with the MRI environment
  • purpose = acclimate individuals to scanning experience & reduce potential anxiety or discomfort when undergoing an actual fMRI scan
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the “pain matrix” ?

A
  • set of brain areas commonly associated with perception & processing of pain
  • areas often light up in response to painful stimuli
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

which brain areas are commonly associated with “pain matrix” ?

A
  • anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, thalamus, and S2 region of the brain
  • note: the validity of pain matrix and its components is an area of ongoing research and debate in the field
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does the brain respond to the transition from innocuous to painful stimuli, and what type of curve characterizes this response?

A
  • Non-linear Response: The brain’s response to this transition is characterized by non-linear curve.
  • Perceptual Shift: This curve represents point where brain activity intensifies, reflecting transition from innocuous to painful sensations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which brain regions respond in a non-linear fashion during the transition from innocuous to painful stimuli, and how well does this non-linear curve explain people’s pain perception?

A
  • insular cortex, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) & Periaqueductal Gray (PAG)
  • non-linear sigmoidal fit of signals from these regions can explain up to 85% of the variance in individuals’ pain perception, shedding light on how the brain processes and perceives pain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is perceived control in the context of pain?

A
  • refers to the belief that one can influence the aversiveness of a painful event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the behavioural responses to prolonged uncontrollable stress?

A
  • Reduced motivation.
  • Impaired learning.
  • Increased negative affect.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the concept of learned helplessness?

A
  • It’s an animal model where animals experience inescapable stress.
  • Results in giving up and learning difficulties.
  • Relates to the experiences of some chronic pain patients
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Do all animals exposed to uncontrollable stress respond the same way?

A
  • No, responses vary.
  • Two groups of animals emerge: those displaying learned helplessness and those continuing normal responses.
  • Research investigates factors influencing these different responses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Why is understanding variability in responses important in clinical settings?

A
  • It helps comprehend different reactions in chronic pain patients.
  • Offers insights into potential interventions and treatments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the effects of low perceived control over pain?

A
  • Increased depression.
  • Increased pain severity.
  • Increased functional disability
23
Q

What are the research goals regarding perceived control and pain processing?

A
  • Understand how perceived control alters pain processing.
  • Explore who can effectively cope with uncontrollable pain
24
Q

Describe the Salomons 2004 study on perceived control of pain.

A
  • Subjects manipulated their perception of controllability using cues.
  • In the controllable condition, they could reduce the hot stimulus duration.
  • Response time had to be below a “response threshold.”
25
Q

What factors were manipulated in the Salomons 2004 study?

A

Perception of controllability.
Hot stimulus duration.
Response time to cues.

26
Q

What were the implications of the Salomons 2004 study?

A
  • The study explored how perceived control over pain affects pain processing.
  • It investigated factors that influence coping with uncontrollable pain.
27
Q

What were the conditions in the Salomons 2004 study regarding perceived control over pain?

A

-Controllable condition: Subjects could reduce the hot stimulus duration.
- Uncontrollable condition: Subjects were asked to respond but were told their response would have no effect.
- Both conditions had the same 5-second shock; the difference was in perceived control

28
Q

What brain regions respond to pain in both controllable and uncontrollable situations?

A
  • Insula & dorsal ACC respond to pain in both conditions.
  • these regions process sensory input (bottom-up) and the perception of control (top-down).
29
Q

How does the activation of the pain matrix differ in controllable and uncontrollable pain situations?

A

-pain matrix seems to be more activated in uncontrollable pain, but self-reported pain ratings do not differ significantly

30
Q

How does perceived control over pain influence pain tolerance and anticipatory anxiety?

A
  • Perceived controllability over pain increases pain tolerance.
  • It decreases anticipatory anxiety.
  • The effects on self-reported pain perception vary among individuals based on the meaning of control.
31
Q

What were the prefrontal responses to uncontrollable pain and how did they influence pain ratings?

A

-In anticipation of pain, activation in ventral lateral prefrontal cortex leads to lower pain intensity ratings.
- Activation in ventral medial prefrontal cortex during pain associated with higher pain intensity ratings

32
Q

What strategy did individuals who had anticipation responses to pain use, and how did it influence their emotional response?

A
  • individuals with anticipation responses used an emotion-focused coping strategy, meaning they coped with consequences of pain & limited their emotional response
33
Q

What brain regions underlie individual differences in coping with uncontrollable pain?

A
  • Emotion regulation regions, including the ventral lateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) and ventral medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), underlie these differences.
  • these regions involved in pain & other emotional responses
34
Q

How do brain regions involved in the pain matrix respond to cognitive context?

A
  • Pain matrix regions are sensitive to cognitive context of pain experience - not just the pain itself but also the context in which it occurs (controllable/uncontrollable)
35
Q

What are the limitations of using imaging studies with small sample sizes?

A
  • Small sample sizes may not be representative.
  • Long-term effects after the study completion are unclear.
36
Q

Why is it important to study the emotional responses of chronic pain patients in terms of how they respond to uncontrollable pain?

A
  • Chronic pain patients often experience uncontrollable pain, which influences their emotions.
  • Understanding emotional responses in such individuals requires designs where one group experiences only uncontrollable events and vice versa
37
Q

How did the study by Salomons and colleagues use fMRI to explore the effects of perceived control over pain?

A
  • study involved 52 healthy subjects exposed to either prolonged controllable or uncontrollable pain.
  • goal was to examine the impact of perceived control on neuronal and affective responses to pain.
38
Q

What were the conditions in the study regarding perceived control over pain for the two groups?

A
  • controllable group: Received pain stimuli & feedback on their responses; believed they could control pain duration.
  • uncontrollable group: Received same stimuli but told their responses had no effect; believed they couldn’t control pain.
39
Q

How did the controllable and uncontrollable groups differ in terms of anxiety levels before and after the experiment?

A
  • controllable group had less anxiety after the experiment, while the uncontrollable group had increased anxiety.
  • perception of control reduced anxiety in the controllable group
40
Q

What brain regions were involved in regulating emotional responses to pain, and how did they relate to the perception of control?

A
  • Amygdala & nucleus accumbens played role in regulating emotional responses
  • amygdala associated with fear & emotional responses, while the nucleus accumbens was linked to reward & pleasure
  • perceived control reduced anxiety & was considered rewarding.
  • these regions involved in other emotional regulation tasks
41
Q

What did the study find regarding functional connectivity in brain regions related to emotional regulation?

A
  • study observed functional connectivity between the amygdala & nucleus accumbens with the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC).
  • Functional connectivity between these regions correlated with reduced anxiety and emotional regulation
  • Similar patterns found for the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)
42
Q

How did the prefrontal cortex (PFC) regions, vlPFC and vmPFC, impact emotional responses in the context of perceived control over pain?

A
  • The PFC regions regulated affective centers in the striatum & amygdala, essentially helping control the limbic & emotional areas
  • Individuals who could recruit vlPFC and vmPFC to regulate these regions benefited from having control.
  • controllable group as a whole exhibited more functional connectivity in these areas
43
Q

In patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD), what is the relationship between brain structures and self-reported helplessness?

A
  • The study aimed to explore gray and white matter structural correlates of self-reported helplessness in TMD patients.
  • Three regions were found to be associated with the degree of perceived helplessness: supplementary motor area (SMA) thickness correlated with higher helplessness, while middle cingulate cortex (MCC) thickness was inversely correlated.
  • These correlations were specific to the patient group and not observed in healthy controls
44
Q

How did the study examine connectivity patterns related to helplessness, and what was the outcome?

A
  • study examined white matter tracts connecting SMA and MCC, using water diffusion measures.
  • found that these regions were connected to a network across the brain, including the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), thalamus, putamen, and the brainstem, particularly the PAG.
  • White matter structure along the corticospinal tract (CST) adjacent to the premotor cortex, in brainstem adjacent to the pons & other regions predicted individual differences in perceived helplessness
45
Q

How do brain structures impact individual differences in coping with chronic pain and perceived control?

A
  • structure of control motor planning & salience regions like the middle cingulate cortex (MCC) & associated white matter tracts were linked to differences in perceived control & helplessness in TMD patients
  • Perceived control over pain reduces activation in cortical salience regions commonly activated in pain (e.g., anterior cingulate cortex, insula)
  • the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) modulate the response to perceived control, helping control primary affect regions like the amygdala & nucleus accumbens
  • Individuals who can use vmPFC and vlPFC-mediated regulation strategies cope better when behavioral control is unavailable (connected to limbic circuits)
46
Q

How are motor areas involved in pain processing and emotional responses?

A
  • Motor areas implicated in pain along with sensory regions
  • an individual who had significant damage to brain regions e.g. amygdala, insula, vmPFC, and ACC was still able to show emotional responses to pain and regulate them in certain situations.
  • this suggests that brain plasticity or limitations of neuroimaging tools may affect the specificity of our understanding
47
Q

What are some limitations of the study, and how do they affect the interpretation of the results?

A
  • A limitation of fMRI is that subjects cannot move, restricting their responses to pain as they would occur naturally.
  • Brain plasticity may allow brain to rewire & perform important functions even when specific regions are damaged
  • Neuroimaging tools may not capture relationships as specifically as desired
48
Q

Is activation in specific brain regions necessary for pain or pain modulation? Is it sufficient?

A

-s tudy involved a ball-throwing game where subjects experienced social exclusion, leading to anterior cingulate activation, which was initially considered part of the pain matrix.
- interpretation was that social exclusion was painful due to overlapping circuitry, highlighting risks of inferring function from brain activation

49
Q

What is reverse inference in functional neuroimaging research, and why can it be problematic?

A
  • Reverse inference = use of brain activation data to identify mental processes engaged during a task.
  • relies on logical errors (affirming the consequent), assuming that activation in a brain region implies a specific mental state.
  • this approach can be problematic bc brain regions may activate in response to multiple mental processes, making it challenging to attribute activation solely to a specific mental state
50
Q

How specific is activation in the “pain matrix” for pain?

A
  • cognitive control, negative affect, & pain are all associated with anterior cingulate activation
  • Activation in the anterior cingulate region does not exclusively indicate pain, as it is activated in response to various stimuli and tasks
51
Q

What was observed in an fMRI study involving non-painful tactile stimuli, loud noises, and attention-grabbing visual stimuli?

A
  • “pain matrix” activated in response to all these stimuli, suggesting that highly attention-grabbing stimuli requiring a response can lead to activation in pain matrix
  • the pain matrix may not be specific to pain but instead responsive to salient or emotionally engaging stimuli
52
Q

How can multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) be used to differentiate between different mental states in brain activation?

A
  • MVPA examines spatial patterns of activation to distinguish between distinct mental states
  • this approach aims to identify specific patterns of brain activation associated with different mental states, potentially allowing detection of pain (or other conditions) based on unique patterns.
53
Q
A
54
Q
A