Negligent Torts - DUTY Flashcards
In general, to whom do you owe a duty?
Reasonably foreseeable plaintiffs
i.e., You do not owe a duty to UNforeseeable victims!
[Thus, rule: Unforeseeable victims ALWAYS lose negligence cases!]
What are the kinds of victims who are exceptions to the general rule that you only owe a duty to foreseeable victims?
- Rescuers, provided YOU negligently place yourself or others in harm’s way (i.e., induce Rescuers to come save you)
- Unborn fetuses (sometimes)
- Intended Beneficiaries of Economic Transactions
When are rescuers owed a duty?
Rescuers are owed a duty when you negligently place yourself or others in harm’s way, such that a rescuer places himself in harm’s way to save you
What happens when a duty is owed to an unborn fetus?
(3 MBE rules)
(1 NY distinction)
IF child SURVIVES: child has cause of action
IF child DIES: child’s estate does NOT have cause of action (but mother/father does)
IF botched diagnosis or sterilization: parents can recover for additional medical expenses and pain/suffering of labor; no recovery for costs of child rearing
[NY RULE: no action for botched sterilization]
What are the attributes of the Reasonably Prudent Person?
- RPP has NO physical characteristics; AND
- There are NO allowances for D’s particular set of attributes (e.g., Low-IQ and mentally ill people are held to the same RPP standard as the average person!)
[BUT NOTE two exceptions!]
What are the six broad categories of “standard of care” rules w/r/t negligent torts?
Rules related to:
- Children;
- Professionals;
- Premises Liability (incl attractive nuisance);
- Statutory (per se) negligence;
- Affirmative Duty to Act; AND
- NIED
What are the standards of care for children?
(U5)
(5-18)
(U18 engaged in adult activity)
IF kid is under 5: No duty
IF kid is 5-18: Child owes duty of a RPP of similar age, education, intelligence, and experience
IF U18 kid is engaged in an adult activity: Child is held to default RPP standard
[Child standard of care is a PRO-DEFENDANT standard]
What is the standard of care for professionals?
(MBE)
(NY)
Professionals must provide the same level of care as an average member of the profession (i.e., Professional has a DUTY TO CONFORM to the standards of the profession)
MBE – national
NY – locality
What is the standard of care for medical professionals?
In addition to that of professionals, medical professionals must:
- Disclose risks of treatment (informed consent rule); AND
- Disclose credible threat of harm (e.g., mental health professionals must warn others of threats disclosed to them by mentally ill patients)
What is the NY RULE on disclosure of medical risks?
Need not disclose medical risk IF:
- Risk is commonly known;
- patient refuses to hear the risk;
- consent is not reasonably possible; OR
- Disclosure would harm patient
What is the duty to unknown trespassers?
No Duty
What is the duty to known/anticipated trespassers?
(4-part test: HACK)
D has a duty to protect or warn anticipated trespassing P about:
(1) Highly dangerous (2) Artificial Conditions that are (3) Concealed and (4) Known
(i. e., D must warn/protect P from “known, man-made death traps”)
What is the duty owed to licensees? (2-part test)
(Licensees include social guests and unsolicited visitors)
D must protect or warn about: (1) Concealed conditions that are (2) Known by D.
(D must warn/protect P from “all known traps”)
What is the duty to invitees?
(Includes patrons or spaces open to public)
D must protect or warn about: (1) Concealed conditions that are (2) Known OR knowable through reasonable inspection
(i.e., D must warn/protect P from “all knowable traps”)
What is the difference between the duty owed to licensees and invitees?
Duty to invitees includes duty to warn about traps that would be discoverable through reasonable inspection
When does an attractive nuisance exist?
(4 elements)
Attractive nuisance exists when:
- There is a known or knowable dangerous condition;
- Children will be near the condition;
- Children will be unable to appreciate the risk posed by the condition; AND
- The cost of remedying the condition would be slight compared to potential harm
What is the NY RULE on premises liability?
In NY, the Entrant’s classification does not matter! The duty is always to act as a RPP
(N.B. The Entrant’s classification may be probative for duty, e.g., a RPP may take greater precautions to protect anticipated social guests than unanticipated trespassers)
What is the two-part test to determine if a statutory standard of care can apply?
IF
- P shows he is of the class of person the statute is meant to protect AND
- His harm is of the class statute is meant to protect from,
THEN statutory standard applies.
(N.B. If D does not meet that standard, then negligence per se)