Negligence: Breach of Duty Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

VA Essay Esam Breach Tip

A

On the exam, explain why the breach is unreasonable.
“this conduct is unreasonable because”…

e.g. a reasonably prudent person, after several martinis, will be too intoxicated to drive; a reasonably prudent person would not leave a spill out for a week because people will slip in it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Breach of Duty =

A

Failure to Meet Standard of Care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

P’s burden to demonstrate breach of duty

A

● P’s burden is to prove every element of the prima facie case (preponderance of evidence).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Two types of evidence to show breach of duty

A

o Direct Evidence (rare)
o Circumstantial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Direct evidence of breach of duty

A

An eyewitness or a recording of the accident while occurring.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Circumstantial evidence of breach of duty

A

Evidence from which one can draw reasonable inference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Slip-and-Fall Cases -reqs for breach

A

P must show that D was negligent for not discovering and repairing the dangerous condition. The dangerous condition was present long enough that D should have noticed it (Ex: P slipped on rotten banana peel).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Res Ipsa Loquitur

A

Allows jury to infer D’s breach based on the nature of the accident and D’s relationship to it.
● Arises when P cannot precisely identify what D did that was wrong, but the situation smells of negligence.
● Only used to show breach. If successfully invoked, the jury can draw an inference of the breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

For Res Ipsa Loquitur, P must show:

A

o This sort of accident does not normally occur absent negligence;

o D is probably the responsible party because D had control over instrumentality of the harm; and

o P did not contribute to the injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Res Ipsa Loquitur: Med Mal - Common Knowledge Exception

A

When equipment is sewn into a P or a sponge is left inside a P after surgery, you do not need experts to establish that this is negligent conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Res Ipsa Loquitur: Med Mal - Multiple Ds

A

o Usually cannot use in multiple D cases, except where a medical team is acting as a unit.

IF ACTING AS A UNIT - Ds will be held jointly and severally liable unless the individual Ds prove that they did not cause the injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

VA Res Ipsa Loquitur Burden

A

shifts burden of producing evidence BUT not the burden of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly