Negligence: Breach Flashcards
2 Stage Test
- How ought D have behaved (Legal)
2. How D actually behaved (Fact)
Standard of the Reasonable Person
BLYTH v BIRMINGHAM WATERWORKS
Breach - Objective Test
GLASGOW CORP v MUIR
Standard of D’s Profession / Reasonably competent professional practice
BOLAM
Common practice wont necessarily justify the taking of risks
RE HERALD OF FREE ENTERPRISE
No allowance for Inexperience
NETTLESHIP v WESTON
No allowance for Professional Inexperience
WILSHER v ESSEX HEALTH BOARD
Maintain standard of a reasonable driver unless D suffers from an Unexpected disability
MANSFIELD v WEETABIX
Reasonable child of D’s age
MULLIN v RICHARDS
Justifiable not to take steps if risk of harm is small
BOLTON v STONE
Not justifiable to avoid steps if risk of harm is high
MILLER v JACKSON
Risk of Very Serious Harm - Must take Appropriate Steps to Mitigate
PARIS v STEPNEY
Consider the Cost / Practicability of solutions
LATIMER v AEC
D’s actions are in the Public Interest - Justify taking Greater Risks
WATT v HERTFORDSHIRE CC
No duty to protect against Fantastic Possibilities
FARDON v HARCOURT RIVINGTON