Negligence Flashcards

1
Q

what are the prima facie elements of Negligence?

A
  1. The defendant owes a duty of care to conform to a specific standard of conduct to foreseeable victims.
  2. The defendant breached that duty
  3. The breach of duty was the actual and proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury
  4. The plaintiff suffered damages to person or property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the general standard of care?

A

The general standard of care is a reasonable person (Objective standard) (average mental ability but the same physical characteristics as the defendant)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the exceptions to the general standard of care?

A
  1. Children under 5 - 0 duty of care
  2. Professionals must exercise the knowledge and skill of an average member of the profession in good standing -
  3. Children must conform to the standard of care of a child of like age, education, intelligence, and experience (except the adult standard applies if the child is engaged in an adult activity then reasonable person (objective standard) e.g operating a motorized vehicle ⭐
  4. A landowner’s standard of care under traditional rules usually depends on the status of the person injured on the property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

who are unknown trespassers and what duty of care are they owed?

A

didn’t know they are there. Unforeseeable victim. 0% duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

who are known trespassers and what duty of care are they owed?

A
Anticipated trespasser (have frequently been on the land before). Those you should expect to trespass even if you don't know they are there at that moment
 - must protect hazards on the land that meet the 4 part test
  1. Condition in question must be artificial - constructed by human beings. Natural conditions such as ice, snow etc is 0
  2. Condition must be highly dangerous - capable of conflicting bodily harm/death
  3. Condition must be concealed from the trespasser.
  4. Owner of the property must have prior knowledge that the condition exists.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

who are licensees and what duty of care are they owed?

A

enter land with express or implied permission. They do not confer any economic benefit. E.g social guests, people selling or convincing you to buy something.

Duty is a 2 past test

  1. Condition must be concealed by them and
  2. Known to the property owner beforehand.

The owner or occupier has no duty to a licensee to inspect for defects nor to repair known defects.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

who are Invitees and what duty of care are they owed?

A

enter with permission and enter to confer economic benefit on the posesser. E.g business customer. Persons who enter the premises for a purpose connected with the landowner’s business are invitees and are owed a higher duty.

Similarly, a member of the public visiting a free museum is an invitee. Invitees include those who enter the premises for a purpose for which the land is held open to the public.

Duty is a 2 past test
1. Condition must be concealed by them and 2. Known to the property owner beforehand or could be discovered through a reasonable inspection (inspection by the reasonable person).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When does a person lose their status as an invitee?

A

A person loses his status as an invitee if he exceeds the scope of the invitation-if he goes into a portion of the premises where his invitation cannot reasonably be said to extend.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the firefighters rule when it comes to premises liability?

A

Firefighters can not recover from any injury that is an inherent risk of the job e.g getting burned, smoke inhalation, getting hit by falling debris. The same for police officers. But be aware that not every injury might be an inherent risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

is the owner or occupier of an open land liable to injuries suffered by a recreational user?

A

if an owner or occupier of open land permits the public to use the land for recreational purposes without charging a fee, the landowner is not liable for injuries suffered by a recreational user unless the landowner willfully and maliciously failed to guard against or warn of a dangerous condition or activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the attractive nuisance doctrine?

A

if there is something on the land that pulls children in then you should take reasonable care to protect children from the danger on your land.

To satisfy this doctrine, there must be:

  1. Artificial dangerous condition
  2. Landowner should know it would attract children to trespass
  3. The child themselves (subjective standard) because of age or immaturity fails to realize the risk or appreciate danger involved
  4. Balancing test - ultility of maintaining the condition is slight compared to the risks involved
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how can landowners satisfy a duty in premises liability?

A
  1. To repair or make safe

2. Provide a warning e.g oral warning or sign because it makes a hidden danger into an obvious one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

when can a statue serve to establish a specific standard of care in place of the general standard of ordinary care?

A

if the plaintiff is within the class that the statute was intended to protect and the statute was designed to prevent the type of harm suffered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the exception to the statutory standard of care?

A

Violation of an applicable statute may be excused if:

(i) compliance with statute would cause more danger than violation
(ii) compliance with the statue would be beyond the defendant’s control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain negligence per se?

A

Violation of an applicable statute is “negligence per se” this means that the plaintiff will have established a conclusive presumption of duty and breach of duty by showing a violation of the statue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

is there a duty to act affirmately?

A

No duty to undertake a course of conduct (rescue) but if you choose to then you have to act as a reasonably prudent person

17
Q

what are the exceptions to the no duty to act/rescue?

A
  1. If there is a pre existing relation between plaintiff and defendant then that triggers a duty - normally a legal relationship e.g innkeeper and guest, employer and employee, land owner and guest
  2. If the plaintiff put the defendant in peril - the defendant put the person in danger
18
Q

what is the basis of liability when it comes to negligent infliction of emotional distress?

A

The defendant breaches a duty to the plaintiff by creating a risk of physical injury and the plaintiff suffers emotional distress as a result. The plaintiff must be within the “zone of danger”.

19
Q

what does it mean for a plaintiff to be within the zone of danger?

A

The plaintiff must be present at the scene and observed what happened. Can not just be heard or fear

20
Q

what is a near miss case and what must be shown?

A

negligent defendant who did not hurt the plaintiff but almost did
Must show you suffered subsequent physical manifestation. Something that can be objectively measured to make sure that someone is not lying. E.g fear

21
Q

what is a bystander case?

A

Negligent defendant can cause serious injury or death to a non party in the lawsuit e.g sadness, grief, mourning
(i) is closely related to the injured person, (ii) was present at the scene of the injury, and (iii) personally observed or perceived the event in real time

22
Q

what is a business relationship case?

A

Plaintiff and defendant who are in a pre-existing business relationship where careless performance is highly likely to cause emotional distress. E.g medical patient is told she has cancer whereas she doesn’t. E.g funeral home cremated a family member that was meant to have a viewing.

23
Q

what is “breach of duty”

A

Part of the case where the plaintiff must demonstrate what the defendant did wrong and must give a reason why it’s wrong. Fact + Reason

24
Q

what are the different ways to show a breach?

A

Res Ipsa loquitur
Violation of statute
Custom or usage

25
Q

what does res ipsa loquitur create an inference of?

A

Under res ipsa loquitur, the fact that an injury occurred may/tends create an inference that the defendant breached his duty.

26
Q

what are the three requirements for res ipsa loquitur?

A

a. The accident causing the injury is a type that normally occurs with negligence
b. The negligence is attributable to the defendant (usually because the defendant is in exclusive control of the instrumentality causing the injury but NOT necessary)
c. The injury was not attributable to the plaintiff’s own conduct

27
Q

how is actual/factual causation usually established?

A

usually established by the “but for” test—an act is the actual cause of an injury when it would not have occurred but for the act

28
Q

describe Joint causes

A

when two acts bring about an injury and either one alone would have sufficed, either of the acts is an actual cause of the injury if it was a “substantial factor” in bringing it about

29
Q

Describe alternate causes

A

when two acts were negligent but it is not clear which was the actual cause of the injury, the burden shifts to each of the negligent actors to show that his negligent act was not the actual cause but if none of them can prove who it is then you hold them jointly liable.

30
Q

Describe proximate cause

A

a. Limits liability for unforeseeable consequences of the defendant’s actions
b. The defendant is liable for all harmful results that are the normal incidents of and within the increased risk from the defendant’s actions
c. Indirect cause cases: An intervening force occurs after the defendant’s negligent act and combines with it to cause the injury

31
Q

will the plaintiff recover for all damages if the plaintiff shows actual harm of injury and why

A

The plaintiff will recover for ALL damages (egg shell skull rule - you take your plaintiff as you find them)

32
Q

what are the defences to negligence?

A
  1. Contributory negligence
  2. Comparative negligence
  3. Assumption of risk
33
Q

what can a negligent plaintiff recover in a pure comparative negligence state?

A

In a pure comparative negligence state, a negligent plaintiff can recover damages reduced by the percentage of her fault even if she was primarily at fault

34
Q

what can a plaintiff recover in a partial or modified comparative negligence state

A

In a partial/modified comparative negligence state, a negligent plaintiff can recover reduced damages as long as her fault is not above a certain level (usually 50%); if it is, she is barred from recovering

35
Q

when does assumption of risk arise?

A

arises when the plaintiff is aware of a risk and voluntarily assumes it (either expressly or impliedly) a. In comparative negligence states, most implied assumption of risk situations are analyzed under comparative negligence rules

36
Q

what is a direct cause case?

A

A direct cause case is one where the facts present an uninterrupted chain of events from the time of the defendant’s negligent act to the time of plaintiff’s injury. If a particular harmful result was at all foreseeable from the defendant’s negligent conduct, the unusual timing of cause and effect or the unusual manner in which the injury occurred is not relevant to the defendant’s liability.

37
Q

what are some examples of intervening forces that are almost always foreseeable in a proximate cause analysis?

A
  • efforts to protect person or property
  • negligence of rescuers
  • a subsequent disease