Negligence Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of Negligence

A

A person acts negligently if the person does not exercise reasonable care under all circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

4 elements of negligence

A

1 - duty - standard of care - standard is a reasonably prudent person
2 - breach (heart of negligence) - did D breach his duty/deviate from the standard of care?
3 - causation - did the breach of duty cause damages?
4 - damages - there must be truly actual compensatory damages for there to be negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what reasonable precautions does an individual have a responsibility to take when dealing with dangerous instruments such that the risk of injury posed by the instrument does not outweigh its utility?

A

1 - purpose for which they are used
2 - the probability of injury
3 - the precautions necessary to prevent such injury
4 - the relations such precautions bear to the beneficial use of the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

L x P > B

A

Injury x Probability is greater than burden - negligent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The standard of care is…

A

the reasonably prudent person standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

is the standard of care objective or subjective?

A

objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Standard of Care and physical disabilities

A

If someone has a physical disability, you insert the physical disability into the standard of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Standard of Care and mental disabilities

A

If someone has a mental disability, you do NOT add this into the standard of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Standard of Care for drivers

A

Drivers have a duty to investigate and maintain their vehicles that may become dangerous when their dangerous condition could be found through a reasonable inspection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Standard of Care for new drivers v. old drivers

A

Held to the same standard!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Standard of Care for individuals with superior skills

A

If P finds out that D is a specialist and for example, they are doing a medical procedure, then they would be held to a higher standard if it turns out that the doctor did not disclose an important illness or some factor that would affect a surgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Custom and Standard of Care

A

P may offer evidence of custom, common usage, and practice in making his case for negligence

Universality - the practice does not need to be universal but it should be fairly well defined

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Emergency situations and SoC

A

D only needs to act like a reasonably prudent person confronted with the same emergency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Child involved in an inherently dangerous activity and SOC

A

A child may be held to a higher adult standard of care when the child is engaged in an inherently dangerous activity for which the adult standard should apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

SOC for minors with superior intelligence

A

subjective test - if a minor D is more intelligent or less intelligent, they will be held to a degree of care that similarly intelligent minor Ds would exercise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Definition of Malpractice

A

negligence done by a professional acting in the scope of his profession

17
Q

SoC for Professionals - average?

A

No, because a below average professional could still provide a minimally prudent standard of care

18
Q

Basic Principle of SoC for professionals

A

reasonable prudent person takes on the profession of the actor and an objective standard is applied

19
Q

SoC for lawyers

A

A lawyer is not liable for a mere error in judgment if they use reasonable care and diligence that other lawyers would use

20
Q

national standards v. local standards

A

When there is a nationally certified professional, they have to comply with national standards not local standards

(architects, lawyers, doctors)

21
Q

Rule statement for negligence

A

An action for negligence requires the plaintiff to prove to a jury by a preponderance of evidence that the defendant had a duty, he breached that duty, and that the breach both actually and proximately caused the plaintiff’s actual damages

22
Q

Zone 1 for Negligence

A

Case starts here. If P does not produce any evidence in support of her prima facie case

23
Q

Zone 2 for Negligence

A

If P comes forward with enough evidence in support of her prima facie case - case will go to jury

24
Q

Zone 3 for Negligence

A

P’s case is so strong that unless D comes forward with rebutting evidence, the court will have to order a directed verdict in P’s favor

25
Q

RIL - Res Ipsa Loquitur

A

Method to get a case in front of a jury when there isn’t a lot of evidence

26
Q

Elements of RIL

A

1 - thing was in exclusive possession and control of D before accident

2 - the event generally doesn’t occur without negligence

3 - P wasn’t negligence and didn’t have constructive notice