Negligence Flashcards

1
Q

Elements of Negligence?

A

Duty

Breach (of that duty)

Causation

Harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Duty means . . . (in Schechter’s words)

A

The obligation to take risk reducing precautions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

To whom is the duty to take risk reducing precautions owed?

A

Foreseeable victims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In negligence, an unforeseeable victim . . .

A

Always loses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

To determine who is a foreseeable victim, look at facts relating to ___.

A

Proximity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the rescuer exception to the duty of care?

A

Rescuers are always owed a duty of care and are always foreseeable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How much care is owed under the negligence framework? i.e., what is the standard?

A

Care must be exercised as would be exercised by a REASONABLY PRUDENT PERSON UNDER SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The reasonably prudent person standard is a(n) ______ standard, meaning we make no allowances for defendant’s particular ______.

A

Objective

Capabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Will the reasonably prudent person standard adjust for someone who is mentally disabled?

A

No. Inflexible standard.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The reasonably prudent person standard is an _____ standard.

A

Inflexible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the only two situations in which the reasonably prudent person standard is adjusted?

A

D has special or superior skill/knowledge

D has some unique, but RELEVANT physical characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Don is an idiot, but he knows that an intersection near his house is particularly dangerous. Don is in an accident at that intersection sometime last week. The other driver has never visited this area before.

What standard of care for both D and X?

A

X has a reasonably prudent person

Don has a reasonably prudent person WITH knowledge of this particular intersection. Why? Don has special or superior skill/knowledge, so the traditional standard is adjusted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly