Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Public International Law > Negligence > Flashcards

Negligence Flashcards

1
Q

Negligence is a…. Based tort

A

Conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where does negligence steam from?

A

Donoghue v Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is negligence new?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were courts searching for at the end of the 19th century?

A

A general principle to unite those dots of liability A principle that would establish the circumstances in which someone owed a duty of care to other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the contractual idea?

A

You are only liable if you promised to do something Outside of special relationships This posed a particular problem in donoughue v Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the general principle in donoghue and Stevenson?

A

LJ Atkins neighbour principle- you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When did liability expand until?

A

1970s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the 1900s?

A

An age of principles- atiyah

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The general theory of contract and tort appeared from…

A

Liability based upon general principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why the fault principle and not strict liability?

A

Ideology Material factors such as a positive and humane response to victims of industrialisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why does horwitz argue we have the fault principle not strict liability?

A

To insulate industrialists from liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the three factors of negligence?

A

the BREACH of a legal DUTY to take care RESULTING IN DAMAGE undesired by D to the C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Criticisms of horwitz’s theory

A

A little too neat - ignores varying attitudes of judges- was not a pendulum shift from strict to fault principle- narrow legal theorising

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did the end of the 19th century see?

A

Shift in the attitude to workplace injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The fault element

A

If you are at fault you are liableBut what about the C who has to bear the costs of injuries?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The duty element

A

Why do we impose this in the first place?Situations where no duty- drowning child A control mechanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Causal element

A

Damage in a necessary ingredient of negligence A causal link between Ds lack of care and Cs damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the basic idea of negligence?

A

The fault principleWhen conduct falls below a certain level of standard, D will be required to pay the damage that causes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a breach of duty?

A

A matter of falling bellow the standard of care that the law demands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Is a breach simply a question of fact?

A

No…. You need legal inference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is negligence judged by?

A

Reference to foresight (by what D knew or ought to have known at the time of accident)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Roe v ministry

A

We shouldn’t judge a 1947 situation with 1954 spectacles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

The reasonableness standard

A

The reasonable person- negligence consists of doing something a reasonable man would not have done, or omitting to do something a reasonable man would have done

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Brown v rolls Royce

A

The reasonable person is the average person doing what everyone commonly does

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Nettleship v Weston
The objective standard is not dependent upon the particular capacities of the individual defendant
26
Roberts v rams bottom
Stroke at the wheel of the car-!9 excuse failing to live up to standard
27
Mansfield v weetabix
Lost control, but unaware of disabling condition (and could not reasonably have been aware) not liable
28
What does the objective standard include and exclude?
Excludes characteristics of the individual but does include children and Mansfield and the particular circumstances in which individuals find themselves
29
Marshall v osmond
Emergencies and rescues are circumstances considered in the objective test
30
Bolam test
Skilled man You are judged against those of the ordinary skilled man professing to exercise that skill (A) acted in accordance with practice (B) is this practice reasonable
31
Maynard
Where there is a conflict of opinion between medical experts not open to the judge to choose between them
32
Bolitho
Bolam test correct BUT not obliged to hold that a doctor not liable for negligence simple because some medical experts testified that doctor's actions in line with accepted practice Courts had to satisfy that the medic experts opinion was reasonable- unlikely to be found in reasonable
33
Conaghan v Mansell
The effect of allowing medical practitioners to define what is or is not reasonable, 'the courts produced results whereby many severely injured patients go uncompensated'
34
Defreitas v o'brien
Doctors are effectively setting their own standards of care
35
Evaluation of medical protection
Assumption that medics are 'doing good'Members of learned professionsTraditionally poor representation for claimants with insurers protecting NHS and doctorsJudges lack expertiseDanger of too much defence for the medical profession
36
Sidaway
At the height of bolam
37
Chester v afshar
A shift away from hard deference and critical stance taken towards clinician involved and acknowledged of importance of patients autonomy and right to self determination
38
Glasgow corp v Muir
Because judges are deciding the reasonable standard there is of course discrepancy
39
Subjective factors that effect decisions in cases
The judges: race, class, gender etc.
40
What is reasonable depends on...
The perspective of the person defining reasonableness
41
why is moving away from the fault principle not a bad thing?
Presumably the increased use of insurance means that more claims are likely to be met
42
The elements of the tort of negligence
1. A legal duty owed by the defendant to the claimant to take care2. A breach of duty by the defendant 3. damage to the claimant cause by the breach, which is not considered by the courts to be too remote
43
What about the D raising a defence
May be able to raise a defence that may reduce the amount of damages
44
Bolton v stone
Claimant hit on head outside her house with a cricket ballHeld the cricket club owed her a duty of care and had breached that duty
45
Strict liability
You are liable without fault
46
Negligence liability
You don't have to prove fault
47
Why did we move to a predominantly fault- based tort system in the 19th century?
1. Influence of social and political thinking in the age of principles (positions of the workers changed)2. A positive response to victims of workplace injuries3. Strategic economic subsidisation of infant industries
48
What are the aims of the welfare state?
To help people who are in need
49
Why do we differentiate those who have been injured through someone else's fault?
MoralityDeterrenceVindication
50
Why is loss spreading
The insurance companies pay from others premium payments
51
Must the insured pay for the uninsured?
NoAlthough denning disagreed
52
Why does D pay?
Often in a better financial position
53
Why do conaghan and Marshall argue that as a result of this loss spreading 'from the very outset negligence proves paradoxical'?
Paradoxical- seemingly absurd Because it isn't really the party at fault who pays- it's the insurer
54
McFarlane
The reasonable man is a traveller on the London Underground
55
Nettleship
A learner driver held to the objective standard to one who has passed
56
Birch v Paulson
D not liable for the serious injuries suffered by a drunk pedestrian who stepped in front of her car
57
Philips v William whitely
Special skillsEar infection after piercing
58
Thompson
Lost hearing working at a shipyard Held- could sue after 1960s when it became industry practice to provide ear protection
59
Wilsher
DoctorHeld to the standard of a more senior position although in training(Bolam test)
60
Woolridge v sumner
Sued after being injured photographing a horse race, reasonable to expect harmNo claim
61
Foreseeability
The more foreseeable and injury is, the greater the possibility that the courts will find D liable for failing to take steps to avoid it
62
Beckett v newalls insulation
The more serious the potential injury, the more likely D will be found to have fallen below the required standard of care
63
Latimer v AEC
The lower the cost of taking precautions the more reasonable if would appear to be
64
Watt v Hertfordshire
He standard of care is lower in an emergency situation
65
The compensation act 2006
Enacted to address the perception of a growing compensation culture in the U.K.
66
Two questions to establish breach
1. How the D ought to have behaved in the circumstances (what was the required standard of care in these circumstances?)2. How the D did behave- did they fall below the standard of care required?
67
What does atiyah say about negligence?
If you're driving you're normally liable Allows for even a reasonable man to make a mistake in the heat of the moment Sympathy and the fact that D will not actually pay the damages if found liable Law in the last 50 years had been expanding liability
68
If it's common practice to speed then can you be let off?
NOCommon practice is only doctors
69
What happens if you have a previous criminal conviction?
You are assumed guilty and must prove otherwise- reverses the burden of proof

Public International Law (13 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions