Negligence Flashcards
Landoccupier
3/2, 3 3
0 0 0
0 2 3
2 2 3
3 3 3
ROLAND Duty to all
Landoccupier No Duty When: UDPCR, NR
- Undisclosed dangerous conditions to landlord ( Lessor does not disclose or Lessor actively concealed condition)
- Conditions premises are dangerous to person outside premise.
- Premises leased for admission of public –stores- lessors has to know the indented use of the property.
- Parts lessor retains controls of, that lessee uses
- Lessor contract to repair conditions or statute requires repairs
- Lessor negligent in making the repairs and lessee is ignorant that the repairs were not made or were made negligently.
- Notes: 1. 1 (a) – 1 (c) condition existed at the time of transfer. 2. 1 (d) – 1 (f) condition can exist anytime.
ACHDTC
- Defendant knew or had reason to know that children were likely to trespass on the place where the condition is
- Defendant knew or had reason to know that the artificial condition was highly dangerous to trespassing children
- Children, due to their age, do not appreciate the gravity of the danger
- The utility of maintain the condition and the burden to eliminate the risk are slight as compared to the risk
- DON’T FORGET ROWLAND
Intervening Force Independant/dependant (N, Accident, Act of God)
- (Independant) Is the force so unforeseeable that it should break the causal chain and be a superseding cause
- (Dependent) Is the force so abnormal highly extraordinary in hindsight should break the causal chain being a superseding cause?
Negligence Per Se
- Plaintiff is in the class the statute was designed to protect
- Is the harm that occurred, the harm the statute is designed to protect?
- Causal connection between the violation of the statute and the injury.
- Does the statute set a measurable standard?
Breach: Is there an excuse?
Rescuer Doctrine (P as a rescuer)
Rescuers are foreseeble plaintiffs.
- The defendant was negligent to the person rescued and such negligence cause the peril or appearance of peril to the person rescued. (To find negligence you need to find Duty, Breach, Causation, and Damages.)
- The peril or appearance of peril was imminent.
- A reasonably prudent person would have concluded such peril or appearance of peril existed.
- The rescuer acted with reasonable care in effectuating the rescue.
- How to prove reasonable care and not reckless (PG v. BU)
Contemporaneous perception
At the same time and is aware
NEID
- (Direct Victim) ( Majority) Physical Manifestation (Minority) Physical Manifestation not Needed
- Bystander (Majority) a. Physical Manifestation, Zone of Danger, Close Relationship (Parent/Sibling) (Minority). Physical Manifestation not needed, Contemporaneous Perception (At the same time and is aware), . Close relation
Bystander (Omission to Act)
- General no duty to act (Present but not taking place)
- Exceptions- Induce P to reliance (verbal or act), increase risk through N or intentional act, or special relationship.
Bystander
Special Relationship Duty to Care
A duty to take care of plaintiff even if the defendant did not cause the injury because defendant is in a superior position to protect.
- Landoccupier or entrant ( Business Invitee, Social Invitee, Known/Unknown Trespasser)
- Employer/Employee- employee unable to care for himself in scope of employment.
- To person rendered helpless by your instrumentally.
- Carrier/passenger; public utility/customer, innkeeper/guest
- Temporary legal custodian; jailer/prisoner
- Parent/Child
- Spouses i. Must have actual knowledge or a special reason to know of likelihood of his or her spouse engaging im sexually abusive behavior against a particular person or persons. ii. The duty is to take reasonable steps to prevent or warn of the harm.
Bystander
Special Relationship Duty to Warn
- Tarasoff warning: particularized foreseeable” person and harm.
- Psychotherapist-once predict or should have posed serious threat of violence to identifiable 3rd person
- Duty to exercise reasonable care to warn a foreseeable victim.
Bystander Special Relationship Duty to Control
Special relationship to plaintiff to protect against 3rd person i. Ex. Common carrier or
Defendant has special relationship to 3rd person because they have control over their actions i. Ex. Parent/child ii. Ex. Employer/Employee
Damages
Wrongful Death/Death/Life/Pregnancy
By doctor
- Failure to inform = informed consent a. whether or not a reasonably prudent patient, fully advised of the material known risks, would have consented to the suggested treatment b. plaintiff must prove that they would have done something different had they had that certain type of information
- Malpractice a. Mistakes in diagnoses, surgery, office treatment, prescriptions, testing, surgical procedures, etc.
Damages: Wrongful death of unborn children
- Majority a. Parents sue for emotional distress/ MAYBE Medical expenses for death
- Minority a. No damages allowed
Damages: Wrongful life of the child
- Majority: (P) Emotional distress (C) Medical bills (life v. no life)
- Minority: No damages for P or C
Damages: Wrongful birth
- Majority: (P) Emotional Distress (C) Cost of Care -Pleasure of having a child
- Minority: No damages