Negligence Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of negligence?

A

Negligence is doing something the reasonable person would not do or failing to do something the reasonable person would do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who is the reasonable person?

A

A man or woman on the London underground

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do you establish a duty of care?

A

The courts will use the Robinson approach by applying a pre existing duty of care e.g doctor to patient, parent to child

Robinson V CC west york police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the caparo test?

A

Used in novel situations , is the harm foreseeable, is their sufficient proximity between parties, is it fair just and reasonable to impose a duty of care

Kent V Griffiths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who would an ordinary person be held to the standard of?

Breach of duty

A

The standard of the reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who would professionals be held to the standard of?

A

The reasonable and competent body of professional opinion

Bolam V Friern hospital

Doctors must inform patients about all risks of treatments so they can fully consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What standard would learners be held to?

A

The standard of the experienced person

Nettleship V western

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the risk factors considered?

A
  • special characteristics (Paris V Stepney)
  • Size of the risk ( Bolton V Stone)
  • Cost and effort (Latimer V AEC)
  • Knowledge of the danger ( Roe V Minister of health)
  • Public Benefit (Watt V Hertfordshire CC)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is factual causation assessed ?

A

But for the defendants actions would the death or injury have happened when it did or as it did

Barnett v Chelsea kensington hospital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is legal causation assessed?

A

Intervening acts- any unexpected acts may break the chain of causation

Mckew V Holland, Hannen & cubbits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is legal causation assessed?

  • Remoteness of damage
A

The damage must not be to remote from the breach of duty from the defendant

The wagon mound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the thin skull rule?

A

Any pre-existing conditions should be disregarded and the defendant should take the victim as they find them

Smith V Leech brain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly