Negligence Flashcards

1
Q

What does the case Robinson V CC of WY say?

A

Use this case if the duty is well established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the case Wilsher V Essex?

A

That well established duty is medically practitioner and patient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does the case Nettleship V Weston say?

A

Well established duty when vehicle user and other road users

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the case Robinson V CCWY say?

A

Well established duty when police and other HM services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the case Donoghue V Stevenson say?

A

Well established duty when manufacturer and customers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What test do you use when the duty isn’t well established?

A

Caparo test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case do you use for the Caparo test?

A

Caparo V Dickman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the first part of the Caparo test?

A

Was the damage or harm reasonably foreseeable?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the second part of Caparo test?

A

Were D and C proximate?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the third part of Caparo test?

A

Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the case Kent V Griffiths define?

A

Part 1 of Caparo test - was the damage or harm reasonably foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the case Bourhill V Young define?

A

Part 2 of Caparo test - proximity of relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the case Hill V CC of WY define?

A

Part 3 of Caparo test - is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is stage 2 of negligence?

A

Breach of duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does the case Blyth V Birmingham Waterworks say?

A

Breach of duty is reasonable person test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the case Mullin V Richards say?

A

Use when a child is present - reasonable child of same age test

17
Q

What does the case Bolam V Friern HMC say?

A

Use when competent body of fellow professionals

18
Q

What does the case Bolitho V CHA say?

A

The decision must be logical

19
Q

What does the case Nettleship V Weston say?

A

No allowances for inexperience

20
Q

What do the risk factors do?

A

Determine the standard of care that should have been given

21
Q

What does the case Bolton V Stone say about risk factors?

A

Size of the risk

22
Q

What does the case Latimer V AEC Ltd say about risk factors?

A

Appropriate precautions

23
Q

What does the case Roe V MOH say about risk factors?

A

Known risks

24
Q

What does the case Paris V Stepney say about risk factors?

A

Specially characteristics of the claimant

25
What does the case Watt V HCC say about risk factors?
Social utility
26
What case do you use in medical cases when the patient isn’t told about all the risks?
Montgomery
27
What is stage 3 of negligence?
Damage
28
What is the first part of stage 3?
Causation
29
What does the case Barnett V Chelsea represent?
But for test
30
What does the case McKew V Holland represent in the intervening acts?
Intervening acts of the claimant
31
What does the case Knightley V Johns represent in intervening acts?
Intervening acts of a 3rd party
32
What does the case Carslogie represent in intervening acts?
Intervening acts of a natural event
33
What is the second part of damage?
Remoteness of damage
34
What case represents remoteness of damage?
The Wagon Mound
35
What does the case Bradford V Robinson Rentals say about remoteness of damage?
It is irrelevant if more serious or happened in unexpected way, as long as general type is reasonably foreseeable
36
What is the third part of damage?
Eggshell skull rule
37
What does the case Smith V Leech Brain and Co say about eggshell skull rule?
D is still liable if damage is more serious because C had a pre-existing condition