Negligence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Who is the claimant?

A

The claimant is the person who has suffered and is bringing the claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is stage one of negligence?

A

Duty of Care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When will the case of Robinson V CCWY be used?

A

If it is well established that a duty should exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case gives the relationship between medical practitioners and patients?

A

Wilsher V Essex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case gives the relationship between vehicle user and other road users?

A

Nettleship V Weston

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case gives the relationship between police and other HM services?

A

Robinson V CCWY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case gives gives the relationship between manufacturer and customers?

A

Donoghue V Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When is the case of Caparo V Dickman used?

A

Only used is novel situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the three parts of the caparo test?

A

•Was the damage or harm reasonably foreseeable?
•We’re the d and c proximate?
• Is it FJR to impose a duty?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What case asks was the harm reasonably foreseeable?

A

Kent V Griffiths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case asks were the defendant and claimant proximate?

A

Bourhill V Young

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case asks is it FJR to impose a duty?

A

Hill V CC of WY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is stage two of negligence?

A

Breach of Duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case tells us the standard of the reasonable person?

A

Blyth V BWW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What case tells us the standard of the reasonable child of the same age?

A

Mullins V Richard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What case tells us the standard of a competent body of fellow professionals?

A

Bolam V Friern HMC

17
Q

What does the case of Bolitho V CHA tell us?

A

It must be a logical decision

18
Q

What case tells us there are no allowances for inexperience?

A

Nettleship V Weston

19
Q

What are the five risk factors?

A

•size of risk
•appropriate precautions
•known risks
•special characteristics of the claimant
•social utility

20
Q

What case is used for size of risk?

A

Bolton V Stone

21
Q

What case is used for appropriate precautions?

A

Latimer v AEC

22
Q

What case is used for known risks?

A

Roe V MOH

23
Q

What case is used for special characteristics of the claimant?

A

Paris V Stepney

24
Q

What case is used for social utility?

A

Watt v HCC

25
Q

What does the case of Montgomery tell us?

A

The patient should be told all material risks, including whatever the patient wan to to know

26
Q

What is stage three of negligence?

A

Damage

27
Q

What case determines the ‘but for’ test?

A

Barnett V Chelsea

28
Q

What are the three unforeseeable and overwhelming acts?

A

• act of the claimant
• act of a third party
• act of a natural event

29
Q

What case is used for act of the claimant?

A

Mckew V Holland

30
Q

What case is used for act of a third party?

A

Knightly V Johns

31
Q

What case is used for a natural event?

A

Carslogie

32
Q

What does the case of The Wagon Mound tell us?

A

General type of damage must be reasonably foreseeable

33
Q

What does the case of Bradford V Robinson Rentals tell us?

A

It is irrelevant if it more serious, or happens in an unexpected way, as long as the general type of damage is reasonably foreseeable

34
Q

What does the ‘eggshell skull’ rule tell us?

A

If the damage is more serious because the claimant had a pre-existing conditions, the D is liable for the subsequent consequences

35
Q

What case is used for the ‘eggshell skull’ rule?

A

Smith V Leech Brain and Co