Negligence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Definition of negligence

A

An act or omission which leads to injury and or damage of a person and or their property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definition of duty

A

There is a duty to take reasonable care to avoid act or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 rules set out in Robinson V CCWY

A
  1. existing precedent 2. statutory authority 3. Analogy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Case for existing precedent

A

Donoghue V Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Example for a statutory authority

A

Road Traffic Act 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Definition of breach

A

When behaviour falls below standard of the reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what case set out objective test

A

Blyth V Birmingham Waterworks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case for professionals

A

Bolam V Friern

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case for children

A

Mullins V Richards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Case for sportsman

A

Condon V Basi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

5 varying factors

A
  1. Foreseeability 2. Special characteristics 3. Precautions 4. Social utility 5. Common practice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case for foreseeability

A

Bolton V Stone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Case for special characteristics

A

Paris V Stepney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Case for precautions

A

Latimer V AEC Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

case for Social utility

A

Watt V HCC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

case for Common practice

A

Thompson V Smith Ship Repairs

17
Q

Test made in factual causation

A

But for test

18
Q

Case for factual causation

A

Barnett V Chelsea

19
Q

Legal causation

A

Not breaking chain of causation

20
Q

Case for remoteness

A

Wagon Mound

21
Q

case for Thin skull rule

A

Smith V Leech brain

22
Q

How is legal causation established

A

The remoteness of damage test