Negligence Flashcards
What is NIED?
Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
Plaintiff can recover if in zone of danger and threat of physical impact caused emotional distress.
- Must be manifested by physical symptoms
- Pure economic loss = no recovery.
Bystander outside zone of danger can recover if
- closely related
- was present at scene AND
- personally observed injury
Special Relationship
- Mishandling a corpse
- Common carrier mistakenly reporting death of relative.
- No physical symptoms needed.
What is comparative fault?
Pure Comparative Fault
- Proportioned equally
Modified/Partial Comparative Fault
- P 50% at fault = 50% recovery
- P 49% at fault = 51% recovery
- P 51% at fault = No recovery.
What is the test for actual cause?
But for
What is the test for actual cause when there are multiple or indeterminate causes?
Substantial factor
Note: concert of action: common plan or scheme = all liable joint and severally.
What is proximate cause?
Majority: reasonably foreseeable consequences, type of harm must be foreseeable but extent of harm does not need to be.
Minority: direct cause or all consequences.
What is a land possessor’s duty in regard to landlord-tenant issues?
Landlord is liable for injuries in
- Common areas
- Hidden dangers landlord fails to warn about
- Areas leased for public use
- Result of landlord’s negligent repair
- Hazard landlord agreed to repair.
What is joint and several liability?
When 2+ defendants are liable, can sue either of them for entire harm.
What is several liability?
Each defendant is liable for his proportionate share of harm.
What is contribution?
One defendant can collect money from other when plaintiff sues first defendant for entire harm.
What are the two trends for determining whether there has been a breach of the duty of care?
Traditional: reasonably prudent person
Modern: cost-benefit analysis
- foreseeable likelihood that defendant’s conduct would cause harm.
- Foreseeable severity of harm; and
- The defendant’s burden in avoiding harm.
What is res ipsa loquitor?
Trier of fact may infer negligence when there is only circumstantial evidence.
Traditional Elements
- Accident was of the kind that ordinarily does not occur in absence of negligence
- Caused by agent/instrument in defendant’s exclusive control; and
- was not due to any action plaintiff
Modern Trends
- Medical malpractice - breach unless can exonerate
- Products liability: ignore exclusivity
- Comparative fault: loosely apply 3rd element.
What are the four elements of negligence?
- Duty
- Breach
- Causation
- Damages
Can a plaintiff who suffers only pure economic loss without any personal or property injury recover in negligence?
No.
Note: Can recover if also physical injury.
What is the general duty of care for negligence?
Owed to all foreseeable plaintiffs.
Majority: Cardozo - within the zone of foreseeable harm
Minority: - Andrews: anyone harmed.
What are the specific classes of foreseeable plaintiffs?
Rescuers: danger invites rescue.
Fetuses
Anticipated victim of a crime
- Psychotherapist/patient - credible threats.