NEgligence Flashcards

1
Q

What is the GR for negligence?

A

A person acts negligently if the person does not exercise reasonable care under all the circumstances. Negligence is
established through duty, breach, causation, and damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 4 questions for a negligence per se analysis?

A
  1. Was the harm the kind that the legislature intended to prevent?
  2. Is the plaintiff a member of the class that the statute was designed to protect?
  3. Would the harm not have occurred if the D complied with the statute?
  4. Is it applicable to apply the standard in this case?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the rule for negligence under the Cardozo/majority jx?

A

In a majority jurisdiction (Cardozo), a person within the “zone of danger” is a foreseeable plaintiff and is owed a duty of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the rule for negligence under the Andrew/minority jx?

A

In a minority jurisdiction (Andrews), a duty is owed to anyone who suffers injuries as a proximate result of his breach of duty to someone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Duty is established by ____

A

the reasonable person standard of care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 4 elements of negligence?

A

Duty
Breach
Causation
Damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define duty

A

A duty is an obligation, imposed by law, to protect the person of another from unreasonable, foreseeable risk of harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define Breach

A

Breach occurs when the defendant’s conduct falls below the standard of care. To determine breach, the plaintiff must show that the reasonably prudent person in the same or similar circumstances would have acted in a particular way contrary to the tortfeasor’s actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define Causation

A

Causation is a reasonably close causal connection between the conduct and resulting injury. Causation requires proof that the defendant’s conduct is both the actual and proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is actual cause established?

A

Actual cause is established when the defendant’s conduct is proof, on a more probable basis than not, of a cause and effect relationship between and defendant’s negligent conduct and the harm suffered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is proximate cause established?

A

Proximate cause is a policy determination on how far liability will extend. In a majority jurisdiction (Wagonmound), liability may extend to those injuries/harms that are foreseeable. In a minority jurisdiction (Polemis), liability may extend to any injuries/harms directly resulting from the negligent act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define damages

A

Damages are the actual losses resulting from the negligent act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define interveneing

A

Reasonably Foreseeable, so defendant is liable for negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define superseeding

A

Unforeseeable, so defendant not liable for negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly