Neg: Scope of Liability Flashcards

1
Q

What is the Direct Consequences Test?

A
  • it doesn’t matter if accident was unforeseeable, as long as harm was foreseeable
  • once breach is established, D is liable for all consequential damage; only intervening forces cut off liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Foresight Test?

A

1) Was the P arguably unforeseeable?
2) Were the consequences arguably unforeseeable?
3) Was there arguably intervening conduct?
* answering “yes” to any of these=analyze whether to cut off liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

evaluate unforeseeable plaintiff in Palsgraf v. Long Island RR (fireworks in packages exploded)

A
  • D owes duty of care to those in the reasonably foreseeable zone of danger
  • duty that’s owed is determined from risk that can be reasonably foreseen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

evaluate unforeseeable consequences in Hyatt Hotel (P had collapsed lung after evacuating from fire alarm)

A

harm was foreseeable from requiring Ps to evacuate down several flights of stairs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

evaluate intervening forces in McClenahan v. Cooley (owner left keys in his car, which was stolen and chased by cops, causing an accident)

A
  • if 3rd party’s criminal conduct (stealing the car) is foreseeable, and the harm (car accident from police chase) is foreseeable, then the criminal conduct doesn’t absolve D’s liability
  • often policy determines whether intervening force cuts off liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

evaluate shifting responsibility in McLaughlin v. Mine Safety Appliances (fireman gave hot packs to nurse without instructions; nurse used them improperly and injured kid)

A

3rd party’s (nurse) negligence was so gross, it superseded negligence of fireman; 3rd party had actual knowledge of risks/uses (could have read instructions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the Medical Malpractice Complications Rule?

A
  • medical malpractice isn’t an intervening cause to harm that relieves D of liability
  • D has burden of proving medical malpractice, not P
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Eggshell Plaintiff Rule?

A

a negligent actor is subject to liability for harm even if P had a physical condition that was unknown to D and D made it worse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Rescuer Rule?

A

D is liable for injuries to a rescuer helping a person endangered by D’s negligent conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly