Needs s 25(2)(b) Flashcards

1
Q

What does S 25(2)(b) consider

A

the financial needs, obligations and responsibilities of the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who gets housing priority

A

S 25(1) the court will give housing priority to the PWC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Will the court take into account the provisions of a second family?

A

Yes, Barnes v Barnes: keep income to support his second family. So he could not pay an order if it would take him and his new family below subsistence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happens to any maintenance if re-marry

A

will end S 38(3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the effect of cohabitation

A

It may allow the other party leave to appeal if subsequent events invalidate the fundamental assumption on which the order was made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

William v Lindley

A

Wife was living with a third party, but claimed she was living with him as an employee. Clean break settlement given in her favour, including money to enable her to have her own accommodation. Soon became clear she was actually living with him on a personal basis and she didn’t need money for housing as she already had somewhere to live. Court ordered a re-trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The effect of cohabitation Wetz v Wetz

A

lump sum given to wife, then shortly after moved in with another man. Husband then tried to reopen the court order. The fact she moved in with him was not an exceptional circumstance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The effect of cohabitation Atkinson v Atkinson

A

where a wife receiving maintenance moves in with someone else but does not marry them has no automatic consequences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The effect of cohabitation: Macey v Macey

A

resources of a new partner may be relevant as reduce the needs of the party so this should be reflected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Case which states there is a legitimate need to have accommodation with room for overnight contact with children

A

M v B- however, there is not entitlement at law so may not be possible in cases of limited resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What other things may be considered

A

the need for an income/ child care provisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Suter v Suter

A

Ex-wife had moved in with her new partner. The mortgage on the house was being paid by the ex-husband. New partner wasn’t contributing. Main concern was the kids, who live with the mother, but the new partner should be able to make a contribution. The stability of the children should not jeopardise all other factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly