Neck Dissections Flashcards
What is the sensitivity and specificity for physical exam, CT, and combined for detecting neck disease in HN SCC.
Clinical Exam:
- Sensitivity 74%
- Specificity 81%
- Accuracy 77%
CT:
- Sensitivity 83%
- Specificity 83%
- Accuracy 83%
Combined:
- Sensitivity 92%
Remember sensitivities in order = 74, 83, 92 - just add 9!
What are ultrasound characteristics of nodal metastasis? 6
- Spherical shape
- Loss of fatty hilum
- Extracapsular spread
- Hypoechoic and heterogeneous
- Central necrosis
- Mixed vascularity
What are 6 CT signs of nodal metastasis?
What are 5 CT signs of extracapsular extension?
CT Signs of Nodal Metastasis:
1. Central necrosis (most accurate CT criterion)
2. Diameter >10mm in short diameter (>15mm for jugulodigastric, >8mm in retropharynx)
3. Extracapsular spread
4. Spherical shape - L/S (long axis/Short axis) Ratio < 2 (95% accuracy)
5. Nodal grouping (>3 LNs in one area)
6. Rim enhancement
Indications for extracapsular extension:
1. Indistinct nodal margin
2. Infiltration into adjacent tissue
3. Irregular nodal enhancement
4. Matted nodes (fused)
5. Central necrosis
What are the CT and MRI criteria for diagnosis of carotid invasion in HNSCC? 3
What is the definition of unresectable for carotid?
Best modality between CT or MRI or US remains controversial
Raise Suspicion:
1. Effacement of the fascial plane surrounding >25% of the vessel circumference should raise suspicion
2. Tumor involvement of 75% or more of the circumference of the carotid
CT:
- Highest accuracy (84.1%) recorded in 2 types:
- Compression/deformation of the CCA or ICA
- Partial fat or fascia deletion between tumor and the CCA or ICA
MRI:
- 100% sensitive, 94% specific
- Involvement of >270 degrees of the circumference of the carotid artery was accurate in predicting the surgeon’s inability to peel the tumor off the carotid artery in 100% of cases
- Intraluminal tumor (specific for vascular infiltration and unresectability, not very sensitive and infrequently seen)
Unresectable = >270deg involvement on MRI
What is the incidence of cerebral complications following common carotid occlusion?
- Abrupt ligation = 42-50%
- Occluded gradually over < 7 days = 30.6%
- Occluded gradually over ≥ 8 days (e.g. vessel compressed by tumor, or pre-op tx) = significantly decreased to 5.3%
- Unselected ICA interruption = 26% rate of cerebral infarction (Depends on patient age)
What are four tests to assess the adequacy of collateral circulation and cerebral perfusion pre-op carotid resection/carotid ligation?
- 4-vessel angiography (carotids and vertebral)
- Trial balloon occlusion
- Tomography scanning (SPECT, using Tc-99m HMPAO)
- Xenon-133 flow scan
- Other: CTA/MTA?
What is a preoperative intervention that may reduce cerebrovascular accident incidence over simple carotid ligation?
PERMANENT BALLOON OCCLUSION
- Underlying principle is that high embolization of the carotid eliminates the source of stump emboli (retrograde to ECA/ophthalmic, then intracranial)
- Angiographic placement of permanent balloons or coils (embolization) in the carotid siphon region, just proximal to the ophthalmic artery, closely monitored for 72 hours, 2 weeks prior to carotid resection
- During balloon occlusion –> test the patient every 5 minutes, consisting of motor, sensory, memory, speech, calculation, analytic capacity
Regarding the Xenon Cerebral Blood Flow Study, discuss:
1. Normal flow vs. failure of brain function
2. Indications
3. Results - 4
4. Management - 4
- Normal Cerebral blood flow = 50mL/100g/min
- Failure of brain function = < 20mL/100g/min
INDICATIONS:
1. En-bloc resection requiring ICA resection
2. Tumor encases ICA on imaging
3. Contour irregularities of ICA on angiography
RESULTS of Xenon-CBF study (15-minute balloon occlusion)
1. Group I: No CBF side difference
2. Group II: Mild symmetric CBF decrease
3. Group III (10-15%): Marked decrease in CBF (< 30mL/100g/min)
4. Group IV (5%): Neurologic deficit, CBF < 20mL/100g/min
2% that pass will still have symptoms post occlusion
MANAGEMENT:
1. Pre-op permanent balloon occlusion for groups I & II
2. Prophylactic or Introperative revascularization for Group III, or I & II if patient young or if contralateral disease present
3. No surgery or prophylactic revascularization for Group IV patients
What are the 3 pathways of referred otalgia? Discuss the anterior tongue, base of tongue, and hypopharynx, and their nerve ganglia.
Anterior Tongue: V3, from Gasserian ganglion (ie. Trigeminal ganglion)
Posterior Tongue: IX, from superior (jugular) or inferior (petrous) glossopharyngeal ganglion
Hypopharynx: X, from superior (jugular) ganglion and inferior (nodose) ganglion
Vancouver Pg 117
Describe the borders of Level Ia in the neck. 4
What does level Ia drain?
What locations are at risk for Level Ia metastasis?
Borders:
- Superior: Mylohyoid muscle/mandible symphysis
- Inferior: Inferior border of Hyoid bone
- Lateral: Anterior belly of digastric muscle
- Medial: Midline structure
Drains:
- Chin
- Lip
- Floor of mouth
- Tip of tongue
At risk metastasis:
- Floor of mouth
- Anterior oral tongue
- Anterior mandibular alveolar ridge
- Lower lip
Regarding Level Ib in the neck:
1. Borders
2. Contents
3. Drains
4. At risk metastasis
5. Structures at risk during neck dissection
BORDERS:
- Superior: Mylohyoid muscle/body of mandible
- Inferior: Inferior border of hyoid bone
- Posterior/Floor: Stylohyoid muscle (or vertical plane dropped from the posterior edge of the submandibular gland) and stylohyoid muscle
- Medial: Anterior belly of digastric
- Lateral: Body of mandible
- Submandibular gland is used for differentiating IB vs IIA Radiographically; clinically is the vertical plane at the posterior aspect of the submandibular gland
CONTENTS:
- Pre- and post-glandular nodes
- Pre- and post-vascular nodes
- Submandibular gland is removed with LN due to close proximity to ensure thorough exenteration of all nodes
AT RISK METASTASIS:
- Oral cavity
- Anterior nasal cavity
- Soft tissue structures of mid-face
DRAINS:
1. Lower face
2. Oral cavity
3. Nodes
4. Includes perifacial nodes (nodes of Stahr) - includes buccinator nodes, superior to mandibular body - at risk mets include buccal mucosa, anterior nasal cavity, soft tissue of cheek
AT RISK STRUCTURES:
1. Injury to marginal mandibular nerve most common
Regarding Level II in the neck, discuss:
1. Borders of level IIa vs IIb
2. What differentiates these two radiographically vs. intraoperatively?
3. What do they drain?
4. Contents?
5. At risk metastasis?
BORDERS LEVEL II:
- Superior: Skull base
- Inferior: Level of carotid bifurcation (surgical landmark) or hyoid bone (clinical/radiographic landmark)
- Lateral: Posterior border of SCM
- Medial: Lateral border of Sternohyoid muscle and Stylohyoid muscle (or radiographically, the perpendicular plane defined by the posterior aspect of the submandibular gland)
IIa vs IIb DIFFERENTATION:
1. Vertical plane defined by spinal accessory nerve (CNXI)
DRAINS:
1. Oropharynx
2. Larynx
3. Oral cavity
CONTENTS:
1. Upper third of the IJV
2. Adjacent to the spinal accessory nerve (SAN)
AT RISK METASTASIS:
1. Oral cavity
2. Nasal cavity
3. Nasopharynx
4. Oropharynx (more common IIb)
5. Hypopharynx
6. Larynx
7. Parotid gland
In absence of IIa, likely not necessary to include IIb for tumors of oral cavity/larynx - controversial
Regarding Level III in the neck, discuss:
1. Borders
2. Contents
3. At risk metastasis
BORDERS:
- Superior: Level of carotid bifurcation (surgical landmark) OR level of inferior border of hyoid bone (clinical/radiographic landmark)
- Inferior: Junction of the omohyoid muscle with the IJV (surgical landmark) OR lower border of the cricoid arch (clinical/radiographic landmark)
- Lateral: Posterior border of SCM
- Medial: Lateral border of sternohyoid muscle (surgical) OR Lateral border of the common carotid artery (clinical/rads)
CONTENTS:
- Middle third of IJV
- Jugulo-omo-hyoid node: lies immediately above the superior belly of the omohyoid muscle as it crosses the IJV
AT RISK METASTASIS:
1. Oral cavity
2. Nasopharynx
3. Oropharynx
4. Hypopharynx
5. Larynx
Regarding Level IV in the neck, discuss:
1. Borders
2. Contents
3. At risk metastasis
BORDERS:
- Superior: Omohyoid muscle (surgical landmark) OR inferior border of the cricoid arch (clinical/radiographic landmark)
- Inferior: Clavicle
- Lateral: Posterior border of SCM
- Medial: Lateral border of the sternohyoid muscle (surgical) OR lateral border of CCA (clinical/radiologic)
CONTENTS:
- Lower third of IJV
AT RISK METASTASIS:
1. Hypopharynx
2. Cervical esophagus
3. Larynx
Regarding Level V in the neck, discuss:
1. Borders and division between Va and Vb
2. Predominant lymphatic pathways
3. Contents
4. At risk metastasis
BORDERS:
- Superior: Apex formed by a convergence of the SCM and the trapezius muscles
- Inferior: Clavicle
- Lateral: Anterior border of the trapezius muscle
- Medial: Posterior border of the SCM
- Floor: Splenius capitis, levator scapulae, and scalene muscles
DIVISION BETWEEEN Va + Vb:
1. Horizontal plane marking the inferior border of the arch of the cricoid cartilage
PREDOMINANT LYMPHATIC PATHWAYS:
1. Va: Spinal accessory nodes (along the SAC)
2. Vb (worse prognosis): Transverse cervical nodes (along transverse cervical artery as it courses along the lower third of the triangle)
3. Vb (worse prognosis): Supraclavicular nodes (immediately above the clavicle)
CONTENTS:
1. Lower half of SAN
2. Transverse cervical artery
3. Sentinel Node of Virchow/Virchow’s node: Left supraclavicular node located at the terminus of the thoracic duct into the subclavian of IJV which can be enlarged in patients with abdominal cancer (gastric, ovaian, testicular, ovarian, renal)
DRAINS:
1. Nasopharynx
2. Oropharynx
3. Scalp
4. ± posterior maxillary sinus
AT RISK METASTASIS:
1. Nasopharynx (Va)
2. Oropharynx (Va)
3. Thyroid (Vb)