nature / nurture Flashcards
briefly outline the nature / nurture debate
relative contributions of heredity and experiences to behaviour
what side of the debate are nativists and explain their theory
- nature side
- we are born with pre-programmed behaviours as a result of heredity
- Descartes suggests human soul is already equipped with an understanding of key concepts
- evidence of support from evolutionary and biological theories
what is meant by heritability
extent to which a characteristic can be attributed to being inherited
give examples of the nature side of the debate from research
- genetic explanations eg. schizophrenia and OCD
- evolutionary explanations eg. Bowlby’s survival theory by attachment
what side of the debate are empiricists and explain their theory
- nurture
- suggests we are born with no drives and we learn everything from experience
- Locke argued we are born as a blank slate and experiences write on this to make us into who we become
- evidence support comes from the behaviourist approach
give examples of the nurture side of the debate from research
- behaviourist approach eg. types of conditioning
- SLT eg. aggression learnt through vicarious reinforcement (Bandura)
what does relative importance mean
- debate is impossible to answer because as soon as you are born you are experiencing environmental factors
- it makes little sense to separate the two
- now more likely to seek the relative contribution of each influence on thought and behaviour
explain the diathesis-stress model as an evaluation for this debate
- genes for a behaviour exist but they must be triggered by stress/trauma from environment
- this suggests cause of behaviour comes from both sides of the debate
- can be seen in OCD - psychopathology
explain epigenetics as an evaluation point of this debate
- change in genetic activity without changing genetic code
- lifestyles and experiences leave epigenetic marks on DNA
- marks tell our bodies which genes to ignore or use
- marks stay in genes and can be passed down generations
- life experience of ancestors cause a nature and nurture interaction
explain constructivism as an evaluation point for this theory
- people create own nurture by seeking environments that suit their behaviour
- eg. a shy child would associate with people who have similar behaviours
- ‘niche building’
- will have an effect on their own behaviour
- evidence as to why it’s illogical to separate both influences of behaviour
what is meant by the interactionist approach
nature and nurture are linked so researchers study how they interact and influence each other
explain how the relative influence of genes can be investigated
- identical twins share 100% of the same DNA so if behaviour was purely based on genetics they should be the exact same - but they’re not, so the environment must play a part
- if measured similarly they would have a high concordance rate
- adoption studies