Natural Moral Law Flashcards
Who founded NML?
Aquinas
What is NML rooted in? (2)
Bible
Aristotle
What was the result of NML in the 13thC? (2)
Unified Christian theology
Became standard Catholic approach to moral decision making
Key Features:
Four Fold Law
1) Eternal Law
2) Divine Law
3) Natural Law
4) Human Law
Key Features:
Primary Principles (5)
Teleological
1) Protect life
2) Order society
3) Worship God
4) Educate young
5) Reproduce
Key Features:
4 Causes
Material Cause
EFFICIENT CAUSE
Formal Cause
FINAL CAUSE
—> Aristotle’s - eudaimonia
—> Aquinas’ - oneness with God
Key Features:
Secondary Precepts
Deontological
Keep pure goal of PP intact
Making Mistakes with NML
Principle of Double Effect
An action has two outcomes, one positive, one negative
Making Mistakes with NML
Principle of Double Effect: FOUR CONDITIONS
Nature of the Act- action must be morally good or indifferent
Means-End- bad effect isn’t means by which good effect is achieved
Right Intention- must be to only achieve good effect, bad effect must be unintentional and can be known
Proportionality- good effect must be at least equivalent in importance to bad effect
NML Evolves
Proportionalism: WHAT IS IT? (2)
Scholars accept at times NML may lead to unloving circumstances because of deontological approach
Natural Law + Ontic Evils = Proportional good achieved
NML Evolves
Proportionalism: HOW DOES IT WORK? (4)
1) Intention of Act- moral or immoral?
2) Ontic goods of act determine if you ignore intention- interior general goodness
3) Proportion of Value judges if thing is good or bad- intention of moral agent + dis value of act
4) Acts can’t be intrinsically evil
NML Evolves
Proportionalism- FORMULA
Intention + Value - Disvalue = Morally Good/ Bad
NML Evolves
Proportionalism- STRENGTHS (3)
Fairly robust
Based on common sense
More loving as more teleological
NML Evolves
Proportionalism- WEAKNESSES (2)
Condemned by CC as denies some acts are intrinsically evil
Calculating proportion of value in an act looks like consequentialist way of deciding moral issues
Evaluating Natural Moral Law
STRENGTHS (7)
Is realistic can confuse real and apparent goods
Universal approach to ethics
Very adaptable
Established common rules
Foundation for natural/human rights
Not subjective but based on what is intrinsically good or bad