Narrative Identity Flashcards

1
Q

Trait approaches to personality

A

Eysenck’s PEN model, Gray’s RST model, Costa and Mcrae’s (1992) Five factor model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Narrative identity is the third and broadest level of personality outlined by

A

McAdams (1996)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Narrative identity

A

Level of personality that captures how an individual defines themselves through the social construction of a coherent and purposeful life story

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

McAdam’s Critique of Trait Theories

A

That traits are not how adults explain their individuality, nor are they grounded in cultural, sociological, or historical context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

McAdam’s theory is based on these assumptions

A

Selfhood is not given, but made, the self develops over time, and that people seek temporal coherence in their self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

McAdams Integrative Theory of Personality draws on evidence from

A

Trait theories and social-cognitive theories in personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

McAdam’s Integrative Theory of Personality

A

Level 1 (Actor)- Traits
Level 2 (Agent)- Personal concerns or characteristic adaptations
Level 3 (Author)- Narrative identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Level 1: Traits

A
  • OCEAN model
  • dispositional signatures of personality
    -stable across lifespan and situations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Level 2: Personal Concerns

A

Individual differences that are contextualized within a specific time or place or role that draw upon many areas of psychology, such as motives, values, goals, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Theory of basic values categories (Schwartz 2012); evidence is drawn from for level 2

A

Openness to change, self enhancement, conservation, self transcendence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Openness to change traits (Schwartz 2012)

A

Stimulation, self direction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

self enhancement traits (Schwartz 2012)

A

Achievement, power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Conservation traits (Schwartz 2012)

A

Security, conformity, tradition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Self transcendence traits (Schwartz 2012)

A

Universalism, benevolence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

___ and ___ fall along the horizontal line thag categorizes the theory of basic values (Schwartz 2012)

A

Hedonism and benevolence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Personal concerns do not make up the whole picture because

A

They don’t present a unified identity of the person across time, place, and role. They also don’t provide us with a sense of what the life experiences mean to the person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Level 3: Narrative identity (McAdams and McLean 2013)

A

An evolving and integrative account of one’s life story that is constructed from autobiographical memory that provides temporal coherence and meaning that is the answer to “who am I?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

McAdam’s (1996) proposed distinct levels of personality that are entirely _____

A

Independent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Developmental trajectory of personality

A

People are born with traits, which shape their goals, environments, and their life stories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

McAdam’s theory of personality had little ____

A

Empirical work examining interrelationships between three levels of personality

21
Q

Buhler et al (2021) measured

A

agency and communion of level 2 life goals and level 3 narratives and personality traits across 2 years

22
Q

Buhler et al (2021) used

A

2-wave longitudinal design to measure traits and goals at wave 1 and wave 2 and a life story interview to assess narrative identity- one in between study waves

23
Q

Buhler et al (2021) findings were consistent

A

With interrelationships between levels but interrelationships we’re bidirectional

24
Q

Buhler et al (2021) results showed consistent findings

A

With trait agreeableness

25
Q

Higher trait agreeableness at W1 associated with

A

Lower endorsement of agency goals at W2

26
Q

Higher trait agreeableness at W1 associated with

A

Greater endorsement of communion narratives

27
Q

Goals at W1 were not

A

Associated with narratives

28
Q

Greater endorsement of communion goals at W1 was associated

A

With trait agreeableness at W2

29
Q

Greater expression of communion themes in life narratives

A

Associated with lower endorsement of agency goals and higher trait agreeableness at W2

30
Q

Life story interview (LSI)

A

Method used to collect data on narrative identity, it positions the participant as a storyteller

31
Q

Process of LSI

A
  • in depth qualitative interview 2-3 hrs
  • person divides their life story into distinct chapters
  • person describes key scenes, characters and plots, and significance of the events in each chapter
32
Q

The life story interview is a ___ method

A

Labor intensive

33
Q

Researchers sometimes collect _____ _______ of key life scenes using similar instructions to the interviews

A

Written narratives

34
Q

Narratives don’t assess the truth of events, rather

A

It’s the individual differences in the interpretation of events that’s important

35
Q

There is often not a constraint in the retrospective time frame for narrative recall, but

A

Rather a focus on subjectively meaningful scenes

36
Q

To capture individual differences in narrative style,

A

Researchers will average a construct across all life scenes

37
Q

This construct is viewed as a relatively de contextualized approach

A

Averaging across different life domains (Dunlop, 2015)

38
Q

Researchers can code for common dimensions and examine how narrative dimensions relate to

A

Variables of interest

39
Q

Variables of interest in examining life story interviews

A
  • agency
  • communion
  • redemption
  • contamination
  • mean making
40
Q

Narrative identity researchers code qualitative data for

A

Statistical analyses

41
Q

Agreement and consistency in the interpretation includes

A
  • defined coding schemes
  • training with example narratives
  • multiple coders, often blind to study hypotheses
  • inter rater reliability stats to examine the consistency and agreement across coders
42
Q

Structure of narrative identity (McLean et al 2020)

A

Autobiographical reasoning, structure, and affective and motivational

43
Q

A contextualized approach

A

Involves averaging constructs across specific life domains (e.g. love or work)

44
Q

The processes involved in identity formation

A

May vary in different life domains (Dunlop, 2015)

45
Q

This approach only collects narratives from relevant life domains for

A

The context under study (e.g. academic and romantic narratives for college adjustment; Lilgendahl & McLean 2020)

46
Q

Narrative identity is not just a bunch of _____ _____

A

Random stories

47
Q

For narrative identity to be a level of personality

A

Then it should predict important life outcomes

48
Q

Researchers of narrative identity have often focused on

A

Health and well-being outcomes