names and studies Flashcards
Tinbergen’s four “why?”s
Causation-Mechanism
Development-Ontogeny
Evolutionary history-Phylogeny
Function-Adaptive value
ingredients of the optimality model
1) a series of choices to pick between, 2) a set of constraints within which the animal must operate, and 3) a currency by which success is measured.
optimality model examples
patch use (dungflies /Parker, 1978/, MVT / Chanov, 1976/) prey choice - optimal prey choice model (specialise/generalise) - European starling - Kacelnik; Great tit - Krebs - show preference
Ideal Free Theory
Millinski - sticklebacks
Ideal free distribution - stable distribution when no one gains from moving.
Applicable to Parker’s duncflies - ideal free mates.
BUT does not take in account unequal ability.
Economic defendability
Brown /territories/
Defending a resource has a cost, so pay off from having unique access to the resource must outweigh the cost.
expr. Golden-winged sunbird - Gill & Wolf
BUT exception - the type of currency results in alternative strategies - sharing territory - benefit of sharing a territory, sneakers and satellites
Sexual selection
Darwin, 1971
Features that promote success in reproductive competition.
May be deleterious to survival.
Natural (viability) selection and sexual selection may act in opposition.
Why sexual selection occurs
Trivers, 1972
Sexual selection occurs because of differences in gamete investment
Fisher’s runaway process
Fisher, 1930
Benefits from being choose, heritable, attractiveness.
Positive feedback. Exacerbation of traits until they become bad for survival. Threshold
What causes it - genetic drift, sensory bias, Fisher’s own idea
Handicap principle
Zahavi, 1975. Benefith of females being choose, heritable, viability
The male ornament is a handicap. Only hight quality males can afford the cost of production and maintenance of the handicap.
Resolving the two problems- strategic - more costly for low quality males; other forces maintain genetic diversity
The parasite theory of sexual selection
Hamilton and Zuk, 1982
Host-parasite coevolution. Choosing the healthier mate