N: Competitive Strategy for International Business Flashcards

1
Q

1) Threat of New Entrants, Threat of Substitutes, Competitive Rivalry, Buyer Power, Supplier Power

A

Five Forces Framework by Michael Porter- represent the key factors that shape the competitive environment of an industry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. Threat of New Entrants
A

(Five Forces Framework ) assesses how easily new competitors can enter the market.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. Threat of Substitutes
A

(Five Forces Framework ) evaluates the potential for alternative products or services to meet customers’ needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. Competitive Rivalry
A

(Five Forces Framework ) examines the intensity of competition among existing firms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. Buyer Power
A

(Five Forces Framework ) measures the influence buyers have on prices and terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Supplier Power
A

(Five Forces Framework ) gauges the influence suppliers have on the industry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

2) The Five Forces Framework Analysis (Michael POrter)

A
  • It is a strategic tool for analysing an industry’s attractiveness and potential profitability,

enabling companies to understand competitive dynamics, identify threats and opportunities, and develop effective strategies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3) Generic Strategies of Cost Leadership, Differentiation, and Focus:

A

These are three fundamental strategies proposed by Michael Porter to achieve competitive advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. Cost Leadership
A

Offering lower prices for products or services than competitors.

(One of Michael Porter’s three fundamental strategies proposed to achieve a competitive advantage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. Differentiation
A

Focuses on creating distinctive, market-specific products.

(One of Michael Porter’s three fundamental strategies proposed to achieve a competitive advantage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. Focus (niche)
A

Targeting specific market segment, niche, or audience, serving their needs exceptionally well.

(One of Michael Porter’s three fundamental strategies proposed to achieve a competitive advantage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

4) Resource-Based Perspective and Tangible and Intangible Resources:

A

The resource-based perspective emphasizes a company’s internal resources and capabilities as sources of competitive advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

“Tangible Resources”

A

are observable and quantifiable assets like financial resources, physical assets, and technological resources.

(Resource-Based Perspective )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

“Intangible Resources”

A

are harder to quantify but include assets like reputation, brand, human capital, and knowledge.

(Resource-Based Perspective )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(VRIO) Framework:

A

The Value, Rarity, Imitability, Organization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

5) The Value, Rarity, Imitability, Organization (VRIO) Framework:

A

The VRIO framework evaluates a company’s competitive potential by assessing valuable, rare, hard-to-imitate, and organized resources, aiming to provide a sustainable competitive advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

6) Institution-Based Approach to Competitiveness:

A

This approach considers the influence of formal and informal institutions (rules, regulations, norms, etc.) on a company’s competitive strategy.

It recognizes that institutional factors in different countries can significantly shape the strategies that are feasible and effective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

7) Position, Leverage, and Opportunity Strategies:

A

These strategies, proposed by Bingham, Eisenhardt, and Furr, offer adaptive approaches to developing business strategies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q
  • “Position Strategy”
A

focuses on choosing a valuable and unoccupied strategic position in a stable environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q
  • “Leverage Strategy”
A

uses important resources in existing and new industries in moderately dynamic environments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q
  • “Opportunity Strategy”
A

emphasizes learning and deploying simple rules in highly dynamic environments to exploit unexpected opportunities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

8) Contemporary Strategy and Competitiveness Debate:

A

This debate explores the evolving nature of strategy in today’s uncertain and dynamic business environment. Newer perspectives challenge traditional approaches and propose strategies that focus on longer-term customer relationships, leveraging technology, and adapting to rapidly changing conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

1) Threat of New Entrants:

A
  • Evaluates ease of new competitors entering the market.
  • Barriers to entry, economies of scale, and distribution access affect threat level.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

2) Threat of Substitutes:

A
  • Considers availability of alternatives fulfilling same need.
  • Presence of close substitutes impacts industry profitability.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

3) Competitive Rivalry:

A
  • Assesses competition intensity among existing competitors.
  • Market concentration, growth rate, and differentiation strategies contribute.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

4) Buyer Power:

A
  • Evaluates buyers’ bargaining power in the industry.
  • Strong buyer power affects pricing, product quality, and terms.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

5) Supplier Power:* Examines suppliers’ bargaining power towards the industry.
* Strong supplier power affects input costs, quality, and availability.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Five Forces Framework

A

helps businesses understand industry dynamics, make informed strategic decisions, and analyse competitive factors affecting attractiveness and profitability. It helps businesses navigate challenges and identify opportunities.

28
Q

Strengths
five forces framework

A

1) Comprehensive Analysis: of industry dynamics by considering five essential forces in the competitive landscape.

2) Structural understanding: aids businesses in comprehending competition’s underlying factors, including entry barriers, buyer-supplier power, and rivalry.

3) Strategy insights: Framework aids businesses in identifying industry factors, making informed decisions, and crafting effective strategies.

4) Predictive power: by evaluating forces like new entrants and substitutes, predicting industry disruptions and shifts.

29
Q

Limitations
five forces framework

A

1) Simplicity: may oversimplify complex industry dynamics, overlooking nuances.

2) Static analysis: lacks adaptability to changing business environments and disruptive innovations.

3) overlooking broader external forces : Framework focuses on industry-specific factors, overlooking broader external forces like macroeconomic trends and tech advancements.

4) Subjectivity: affects interpretation of force influence, resulting in varying conclusions among analysts.

5) In industries with high volatility: framework assessment may become outdated rapidly.

30
Q

Application Challenges

five forces framework

A

1) Gathering data: gathering accurate, up-to-date data for niche industries can be challenging.

2) complex interdependencies.: Forces interact, influencing each other; framework fails to account for complex interdependencies.

3) Overemphasis on competition: overshadows collaboration, alliances, and innovation, highlighting the importance of all three.

31
Q

c) Apply . Let’s have an example of how the 5 Forces Framework can be applied for industry analysis:

Industry Example: E-commerce Retail

A
32
Q

9) Articulate the generic strategies of cost leadership, differentiation, and focus:

A
33
Q

Generic Strategies:
Cost Leadership

A

Definition Offering products/services at lower costs than competitors.

Approach Focus on reducing production and operational costs.
Examples Walmart, Amazon, Southwest Airlines.

Pros Higher profits through price-sensitive customers, cost barriers for new entrants, economies of scale.

Cons Compromised quality, vulnerability to price wars, limited innovation.

34
Q

Generic Strategies:
Differentiation

A

Definition. Providing unique products/services that stand out in the market.

Approach. Focus on innovation, design, brand, and customer experience.
Apple, Nike, Tesla.

Pros. Commanding premium prices, strong brand loyalty, competitive barriers through uniqueness.

Cons. High maintenance costs for uniqueness, risk of changing customer preferences, imitation by competitors.

35
Q

Generic Strategies:
Focus

A

Definition. Concentrating on a narrow or specific market segment.

Approach. Tailor products/services to the specific needs of the segment.

Examples. Rolex (luxury watches), Aldi (discount grocery).

Pros. Effectively cater to specific customer needs, build loyalty, less competition.

Cons. Limited market size, vulnerability to niche changes, potential dependency on a single segment.

36
Q

Resource-Based Approach to Competition:

A

The resource-based approach to competition emphasizes internal resources and capabilities as key drivers of competitive advantage. It asserts that a company’s distinctive combination of tangible and intangible resources, along with unique capabilities, sets it apart from rivals, leading to sustained success.

37
Q

Resource-Based Approach to Competition:

Tangible Resources
Intangible Resources Capabilities

A

Tangible Resources:
physical assets owned by a company, such as financial capital, infrastructure, machinery, and inventory. They are easily measurable and observable, forming the foundation of a company’s operations.

Intangible Resources:
non-physical assets contributing to competitive advantage but not easily measurable. These include intellectual property, brand reputation, company culture, knowledge, and relationships with stakeholders.

Capabilities:
a company’s ability to efficiently use its resources to achieve strategic goals. They encompass skills, expertise, knowledge, and processes that enable superior performance compared to competitors.

38
Q

b) How tangible and intangible resources and capabilities can be utilized to achieve competitiveness:

A

Utilizing Tangible Resources and Capabilities for Competitiveness

Cost Efficiency:
Efficient production processes and cost-effective operations enable companies like Walmart to offer products or services at lower prices than competitors.

Operational Excellence:
Toyota’s lean manufacturing system exemplifies how efficient use of tangible resources, such as machinery and equipment, can provide a competitive edge.

Utilizing Intangible Resources and Capabilities for Competitiveness

Brand Reputation:
Apple’s innovative and quality brand image has helped differentiate its products and maintain customer loyalty, demonstrating the power of a strong brand reputation.

Innovation and Research: Companies that foster innovation and invest in research and development can consistently introduce new products and technologies, thereby maintaining a competitive edge. Like Google

Customer Relationships: Exceptional service and support can foster strong customer relationships, resulting in increased loyalty and repeat business. like Amazon

39
Q

Utilizing Tangible Resources and Capabilities for Competitiveness

A

Cost Efficiency:
Efficient production processes and cost-effective operations enable companies like Walmart to offer products or services at lower prices than competitors.

Operational Excellence:
Toyota’s lean manufacturing system exemplifies how efficient use of tangible resources, such as machinery and equipment, can provide a competitive edge.

40
Q

Utilizing Intangible Resources and Capabilities for Competitiveness

A

Brand Reputation:
Apple’s innovative and quality brand image has helped differentiate its products and maintain customer loyalty, demonstrating the power of a strong brand reputation.

Innovation and Research: Companies that foster innovation and invest in research and development can consistently introduce new products and technologies, thereby maintaining a competitive edge. Like Google

Customer Relationships: Exceptional service and support can foster strong customer relationships, resulting in

41
Q

11) Apply the VRIO framework to organizational examples to assess the strengths and weaknesses of a business:

The VRIO framework evaluates whether a company’s resources are valuable, rare, inimitable, and organized to exploit opportunities. Apply this framework to evaluate a company’s sustainable competitive advantage through analysis of real-world examples.

A

Example 1: Apple Inc.

42
Q

5) Understand the institution-based view on international competitiveness:

A

The institution-based view examines how formal and informal institutions within a country influence a country’s competitiveness, shaping strategies in specific markets and influencing international business strategies, creating competitive advantages or disadvantages.

43
Q

Formal Institutions
Definition

A

Definition: Explicit rules and regulations set by governments.

44
Q

Examples:
Formal Institutions

A

Laws, policies, trade regulations, property rights.

45
Q

Purpose:
Formal Institutions

A

Establish a legal framework for business operations.

46
Q

Role:
Formal Institutions

A

Provide structure and predictability in the business environment.

47
Q

Informal Institutions
Definition

A

Unwritten norms, customs, traditions, and cultural values influencing business practices.

48
Q

Examples:
Informal Institutions

A

Social norms, ethical standards, trust, shared expectations.

49
Q

Purpose:
Informal Institutions

A

Shape business interactions and relationships.

50
Q

Role:
Informal Institutions

A

Influence behaviour and practices, impacting business conduct.

51
Q

Other Key Concepts for Institution-based view on International Competitiveness:

A

1) Impact on Business:
Institutions impact business operations, influencing market entry, property rights, contract enforcement, labour relations, corruption, and ease of doing business. Favourable institutional environments boost competitiveness by reducing risks and fostering trust.
2) Competitive Advantage:
Countries with robust formal and informal institutions, including robust property rights protection, efficient contract enforcement, and low corruption levels, often enjoy competitive advantages in the business environment.

3) Institutional Voids:
Inadequate property rights protection can deter foreign investment due to weak or absent institutions in certain areas, hindering businesses’ effective operation.
4) Adaptation Strategies:
Companies must adapt their strategies to suit the institutional context of each market, which may involve modifying business practices, establishing local partnerships, or navigating regulatory complexities.
5) Long-Term Perspective:
Understanding the institution-based view aids businesses in anticipating and planning for long-term changes due to the slow pace of institutional change.
6) Comparative Advantage:
This perspective complements the resource-based view by recognizing that institutional context can contribute to a country’s comparative advantage in certain industries or sectors.

52
Q

Other (6) Key Concepts for Institution-based view on International Competitiveness:

A

1) Impact on Business:

2) Competitive Advantage:

3) Institutional Voids:

4) Adaptation Strategies:

5) Long-Term Perspective:

6) Comparative Advantage:

53
Q

6) Establish how to choose the right position, leverage, or opportunity strategy:

A

The selection of a business strategy involves a thorough analysis of internal and external factors, considering the competitive environment, resource capabilities, and risk tolerance.

The three key strategies are Position, Leverage, and Opportunity, which are essential for navigating the dynamic international business landscape and achieving sustained success.

54
Q

FACTORS FOR CHOOSING:

6) Establish how to choose the right position, leverage, or opportunity strategy:

A

Factors for Choosing:
1) Environmental Analysis: Understand the market conditions, industry trends, and competitive dynamics.
2) Resource Assessment: Evaluate the company’s existing resources, strengths, and weaknesses.
3) Risk Tolerance: Assess the company’s risk tolerance for dynamic or uncertain environments.
4) Innovation Culture: Consider the organization’s ability to innovate and adapt quickly.
5) Market Focus: Determine whether the market demands stability, expansion, or fast response.
6) Competitive Landscape: Analyse the strength and strategies of existing competitors.
7) Long-Term Goals: Align the chosen strategy with the company’s long-term objectives.

55
Q

Synergy and Hybrid Approaches:

A

Synergy and Hybrid Approaches:

In some cases, a hybrid approach that combines elements of different strategies may be appropriate. to choose a business strategy

For instance,
a company might aim to establish a unique market position (Position Strategy) while also being agile enough to seize unexpected opportunities (Opportunity Strategy). The choice of strategy should reflect the company’s strengths, the market context, and the desired outcomes.

56
Q

Synergy Approach

A

The synergy approach involves combining entities for a greater result, leveraging strengths for advantage. Examples include Disney-Pixar merging creative and distribution strengths, resulting in a unified entity, greater value creation, and less customization.

57
Q

Hybrid Approach

A

The hybrid approach involves combining various strategies to create a tailored solution, such as Amazon Go stores, which combines online and offline shopping, addressing diverse needs and maximizing value through the benefits of different strategies.

58
Q

7) Be aware of, and be able to participate in, the major contemporary debates arising from the study of competitive strategy for international business:

A

The study of competitive strategy for international business has led to numerous contemporary debates, influenced by global market changes, technological advancements, and evolving consumer behaviors.

  1. Globalization vs. Localization:
  2. Digital Transformation:
  3. Sustainability and Social Responsibility:
  4. Agility vs. Stability:
  5. Innovation and Disruption:
  6. Trade and Protectionism:
  7. E-Commerce and Brick-and-Mortar:
  8. Geopolitical Uncertainty:
  9. Talent and Human Capital:
  10. Ethical Dilemmas:

Companies face complex challenges and opportunities in formulating competitive strategies for international business, and staying informed and actively participating in discussions is crucial for adapting to the ever-changing global landscape.

59
Q
  1. Globalization vs. Localization:
A
60
Q
  1. Digital Transformation:
A

The ongoing digital revolution has sparked discussions about how technology impacts competitive strategy.

  • Debates focus on the role of digital platforms, data analytics, and e-commerce in shaping international business strategies.
  • As well as concerns related to data privacy and cybersecurity.
61
Q
  1. Sustainability and Social Responsibility:
A

As environmental and social issues gain prominence, companies are debating the integration of sustainability and social responsibility into their strategies. Balancing profit motives with ethical considerations is a key topic, as consumers increasingly demand environmentally and socially conscious practices.

62
Q
  1. Agility vs. Stability:
A

The dynamic business environment has led to discussions about the balance between agility and stability in strategies.

  • Adaptive strategies that can respond quickly to changes.
  • Stability to maintain core competencies and consistent customer experiences.
63
Q
  1. Innovation and Disruption:
A

The debate focuses on how to foster innovation and navigate disruptions in international markets.

  • Disruptive strategies to create new markets.
  • Incremental innovation within existing markets.
64
Q
  1. Trade and Protectionism:
A

The debate over free trade versus protectionism affects international business strategies.

  • The rise of protectionist policies and trade tensions between countries have prompted discussions on the impact on supply chains, market access, and strategy formulation.
65
Q
  1. E-Commerce and Brick-and-Mortar:
A

The rise of e-commerce has sparked discussions about the future of brick-and-mortar retail.
Companies debate:
* The optimal blend of online and offline presence.
* Strategies to create seamless omni-channel customer experiences.

omni-channel : denoting or relating to commerce that integrates the different methods of interaction available to customers (e.g. online, via a mobile device, in a physical shop, etc.).

66
Q
  1. Geopolitical Uncertainty:
A

Political instability, trade disputes, and changing regulations have led to debates about managing geopolitical risks in international strategies. Companies must decide how to balance global expansion with risks associated with varying political climates.

67
Q
  1. Talent and Human Capital:
A

The competition for skilled talent is a central debate. Strategies revolve around attracting, retaining, and developing international talent in a rapidly changing and diverse workforce.

68
Q
  1. Ethical Dilemmas:
A

Companies grapple with ethical dilemmas tied to international operations, such as labour practices, supply chain ethics, and cultural sensitivity. The debate centres on balancing profit motives with ethical considerations.