My Con Law deck Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Sobriety Checkpoints: which amendment

A

4th amendment unreasonable search and seizure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sobriety Checkpoints: key question

A

The stop of the vehicle is a seizure. Pertinent question is whether the “search” of the person is reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sobriety Checkpoints: test

A

Determine reasonableness by balancing 3 factors:

  1. Invasion of person’s privacy
  2. Government’s interest in the matter
  3. degree to which the checkpoint advances the gov’s interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sobriety Checkpoints: SCOTUS conclusion

A
  1. Invasion of privacy is slight because person only stopped for a minute
  2. gov interest in stopping drunk driving is highly compelling
  3. checkpoints advance this interest even if there are other ways of doing so
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sobriety Checkpoints: MISC conclusion

A

MI constitution affords more protection than the 4th amendment does. Checkpoints violate the MI constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

2nd amendment: difference between MI and SCOTUS

A

SCOTUS: in Heller, conferred an individual right to bear arms outside of the militia.
MI: the MI constitution plainly confers the individual right to bear arms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

8th amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment and minors

A
  • UnC to sentence D to death if crime committed before 18th birthday
  • UnC to sentence D to life without parole for a non-homicide committed before age 18
  • Mandate that judge sentence life without parole on juvenile if it does not allow judge to take into account attendant circumstances.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

School speech: Drug use

A

Schools can take steps to safeguard student from speech that can reasonably be regarded as encouraging illegal drug use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Can free speech serve as a defense in tort cases?

A

Yes. If speech is protected by 1A, protection eliminates liability for the exercise of 1A rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Difference in protection between speech of public concern vs private concern

A

Speech of public concern is afforded much higher protection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Garcetti test for free speech and public employment

A

Gov cannot fire an employee for exercising first amendment right

  1. Did the employee speak as a private citizen on a matter of public concern? If not to either of these, there is no 1A violation premised on employer’s reaction to the speech.
  2. If yes, ask whether the state had an adequate justification for treating employee differently from other private citizens. look at effect on workplace.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is the 2nd amendment limited to weapons in exitence in 18th century?

A

No. Extends to all bearable arms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is it valid under 2A to ban an entire class of guns for individual?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cherry and dairy cases

A

Look for a tax on all the subsidizes just in-state businesses. Evene if the separate parts are valid (tax and subsidy) need to look to the combined effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rule from Locke v. Davey

A

Don’t apply strict scrutiny even though a discriminatory law because state has merely chosen not to fund a category of instruction. Does not require student to choose between beliefs and something else. State’s interest not based in hostility but in want to avoid establishment of religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Commercial speech rule statement:

A

CS does not enjoy as much protection as other speech but has protection under intermediate scrutiny. May be regulated if GOV satisifes 4 part Hudson test: 1. speech protected by 1A-not false and lawful activity 2. substantial interest of gov. 3. regulation directly advances that interest and 4. narrowly drawn.

17
Q

Standing Reqs

A

Injury in fact
causation
redressibility

18
Q

Are funds to to support a political campaign speech?

A

yes

19
Q

Limitations on the expenditure of political funds are subject to

A

strict scrutiny. Must be necessary to achieve a compelling gov interest and narrowly tailored to that interest

20
Q

Difference in treatment between restrictions on political campaign expenditures and political contributions to campaigns

A

limitations election contributions: permissible if closely drawn to match sufficiently important interest
campaign expenditures: strict scrutiny

21
Q

Content based restrictions on speech are

A

preemptively unconstitutional

22
Q

When a state fails to assist party in exercising political activities

A

does not infringe on 1A rights. Apply rational basis review.

23
Q

In a school setting Students’ C rights

A

are not consistent with adults in other settings

24
Q

School officials retain the right

A

to exercise authority consistent with C safeguards to control conduct in schools

25
Q

Object of P&I clause (4A)

A

place citizens of each state on equal footing with citizens of other states so far as the advantages of resulting from citizneship of that state are concerned

26
Q

P&I tax look for

A

Whether MI residents in the same position as the non-residents would pay the same tax. Doesn’t matter that in effect they end up paying more in taxes

27
Q

Equal Protection Clause in MI

A

is the same as the Constitution

28
Q

What powers does the president have beyond those listed in the C

A

Inherent powers.

29
Q

P’s authority to act must stem from either

A

the constitution or congress

30
Q

Jackson tripart test for executive power: When P acts pursuant to express or implied authority of congress

A

Authority at maximum. Authority includes the power congress has authorized plus any power he has in his own right

31
Q

Jackson tripart test for executive power: Absence of congressional grant or denial

A

Can only rely on his own powers but there is a zone of twilight where P and congress have concurrent power and distribution is uncertain

32
Q

Jackson tripart test for executive power: P takes measures incompatible with express of congress

A

authority at a low point Court will sustain action only if congress cannot act in this area

33
Q

Commercial speech factors: how to use

A

Just consider the four factors

34
Q

In MI can you appeal a guilty plea or a plea of nolo?

A

There is no right to appeal. Appeal by application only. Must be filed within 21 days. Can file a late application and court can consider the reason for delay

35
Q

When do indigent people get counsel appointed?

A

Def for any trial
for any appeal as of right
No appointed counsel for discretionary appeals to state high court or SCOTUS
Discretionary criminal appeals = appointed counsel.