Mutuality Principle Flashcards
Erskine, Institute of the Law of Scotland, 3.3.86: (3)
- A ‘mutual contract’ is one in which obligations on each side are causes of each other. Obligations are interdependent.
- The right to performance of such mutual obligations is not absolute but conditional.
- The condition is that performance cannot be demanded unless given in return.
Four remedies to breach of contract
Judicial:
- go to court seeking interdict or specific implement
- go to court seeking damages
Self-help remedies:
- retention (performance is withheld until the contract-breaker repairs the breach)
- rescission (the contract is terminated altogether - the breach must be serious for this to apply)
McBryde argues that the concept of mutuality involves at least five ideas:
- A party who is in breach of obligations cannot enforce performance by the other party (Turnbull v McLean 1874)
- The party who is not in breach may withhold performance until the other has performed or is seen to be willing to perform the counter stipulations (Meikle & Wilson v Pollard 1880)
Once the breach ends so does the right to suspend performance (Macari v Celtic F.C. 1999) - The mutuality concept only applies if the obligations of the parties are the causes of one another or are reciprocal undertakings (Macari v Celtic F.C. 1999)
- The operation of the contract can be affected by the express terms of the contract (Hoult v Tourpie 1999)
- It may not be for any breach that a party can withhold performance (Barclay v Anderson Foundry 1856)
Turnbull v McLean 1874
A party who is in breach of obligations cannot enforce performance by the other party
Meikle & Wilson v Pollard 1880
The party who is not in breach may withhold performance until the other has performed or is seen to be willing to perform the counter stipulations
Macari v Celtic F.C. 1999: (2)
Once the breach ends so does the right to suspend performance
The mutuality concept only applies if the obligations of the parties are the causes of one another or are reciprocal undertakings
Hoult v Tourpie 1999
The operation of the contract can be affected by the express terms of the contract
Barclay v Anderson Foundry 1856
It may not be for any breach that a party can withhold performance
Inveresk v Tullis Russell 2010
Obligations are presumed to be counterparts unless clear indication to the contrary
Obligations must normally be in the same contract but need not be as long as part of a single transaction
Bank of East Asia v Scottish Enterprise 1997
Obligations must also be contemporaneous