Must Knows Flashcards

1
Q

Harry grooms’ girls online, arranges meet ups and rapes the. Female officer pretends to be young girl and arranges to meet Harry. Gets arrested at meet up. What is he liable for?

A

Can be charged with Attempted sexual violation.

Relates to R v Harpur case law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Jack and Jim commit robbery and return home with smokes. Jill sees smokes and is told about the robbery. Police turn up and speak to Jill at the door who says that she doesn’t know Jack and Jim. What offence has Jill committed?

(multi choice)

A

No offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Secondary party who aids/abets/incites/counsels and procures the principal offender. Do they have to be present during the commission of the offence?

A

No. They do not necessarily need to be present during the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Meth lab question. Something about female’s knowledge of males meth lab in garage.

A

No offence committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Definition of Receiving - Section 246(3)

A

The act of receiving any property stolen or obtained by any other imprisonable offence is complete

as soon as the offender has,

either exclusively or jointly with the thief or any other person,

possession of, or control over, the property or helps in concealing or disposing of the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case Law list for Receiving

A

R v Cox
Cullen v R
R v Donnelly

R v Lucinsky

Simester and brookbanks
R v Kennedy
Cameron v R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case Law list for Accessory After The Fact

A

Simester and brookbanks
R v Crooks
R v Briggs
R v Mane

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case Law list for Conspiracy

A

Mulcahy v R
R v Sanders
R v White

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

.

A

.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Definition of Tainted Property

A

(a) means any property that has, wholly or in part, been
(i) acquired as a result of significant criminal activity; or
(ii) directly or indirectly derived from significant criminal activity; and
(b) includes any property that has been acquired as a result of, or directly or indirectly derived from, more than 1 activity if at least 1 of those activities is a significant criminal activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Investigative procedure on how to establish a ‘party to’ offence

A
  • A reconstruction of the offence committed indicating that more than one person was involved, or that the principal offender was
    assisted.
  • Admissions from principal offender that others were involved.
  • A suspect or witness admitting to providing aid.
  • A witness who observed another person’s involvement.
  • Receiving information indicating that others were involved.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Everyone is party to and guilty of an offence who

A
  • actually commits the offence
  • does or omits an act for the purpse of ariding any person to commit the offence
  • abets
  • incidets, counsels , procures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define stolen

A

sec.219 ca
dishonestly and wuthout claim of right
taking any proprerty with intent
to deprive any owner permanently of that property or of interest in that property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

just the accronym case law receiving

A

ldkccc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

just the accoronym conspiracy

A

msw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

just the accronym aatf

A

cblgm

17
Q

What is the doctrine of recent possession

A

The doctrine of recent possession applies to receiving as well as to theft.

It is the presumption that,

where the defendant acquired possession
willingly, the proof of possession by the defendant of property recently
stolen is,

in the absence of a satisfactory explanation,

evidence to justify a
belief and finding that the possessor is either the thief or receiver, or has
committed some other offence associated with the theft of the property, eg
burglary or robbery.

18
Q

Define “offence” in respect of money laundering

A

punishable under New Zealand law,

including any act, wherever committed,

that would be an offence in New Zealand if committed in New Zealand.

19
Q

The donnelley case law verbatum

A

Where stolen property has been returned to the owner or legal
title to any such property has been acquired by any person, it is not an offence to
subsequently receive it, even though the receiver may know that the property had previously
been stolen or dishonestly obtained .

20
Q

What 5 points to be covered with conspiracy suspect

A

• the existence of an agreement to commit an offence, or
• the existence of an agreement to omit or do something that would amount to an offence,
and
• the intent of those involved in the agreement
• the identity of all people concerned
• whether anything was written, said or done to further the common purpose.

21
Q

What is the definition of an ‘offence’ in respect of money laundering?

Actual SA Q

A

punishable under New Zealand law,

including any act, wherever committed,

that would be an offence in New Zealand if committed in New Zealand.

22
Q

Define Aids

A

assist in the commission of the offence,

either physically or
by giving advice and information.

In order to aid, the presence of the person
offering the aid is not required at the scene, before, or at the time of the
offence being committed.

23
Q

Define counsels

A

intentionally instigate the offence
by advising a person(s)
on how best to commit an offence,

or planning the commission of an offence
for another person(s).

Counselling may also mean “urging someone to
commit an offence”, in which case it will overlap with incitement.

24
Q

Define Abets

A

instigate or encourage;

that is, to urge another person to
commit the offence.

As with aiding, the presence of the abettor at the scene
of the offence at the time of its commission is not required.

25
Q

Define ‘attempts;

A

Having an intent to commit the offence
does or omits an act
for the purpose of accomplishing his object

26
Q

How do you show control over property? (receiving MC)

Where property is located at a place, of which the receiver has control, the prosecution must prove that:

A

Receiver arranged for the property to be delivered there OR
On discovering the property, he or she intentionally exercised control over the property

Intent must also be there.

27
Q

What to cover when interviewing a suspect about money laundering

A
• suspect’s legitimate income
• suspect’s illegitimate income
• expenditure
• assets
• liabilities
• get financial records, from banks, financing companies, loan
sharks, family trust documents
• clarification of documentary evidence located, as per above
28
Q

What needs to be proved for money laundering?

This is a short answer q, know this verbatim

A

In respect of any property that is the proceeds of an offence

engages in a money laundering transaction

knowing or believing that all or party of the property is the proceeds of an offence

or being reckless as to whether or not the property is the proceeds of an offence

29
Q

Multi choice: Something about a guy scoping out a garage thinking about a burg or something

A

answer: NOT an attempt, is merely preparation

30
Q

Define the term “unlawfully benefitted” as section 7 criminal proceeding act

this one was an actual SA question

A

Knowingly,
Directly or Indirectly
Derived a benefit from significant criminal activity (whether or not that person undertook or was involved in the significant criminal activity)

31
Q

Define ‘incite’ MC

A

32
Q

Under 116 something about does prosecution have to be pending to comnit obstruction of justice or something

MC

A

no