Must Know 6.1 Flashcards
The definition of liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk of not being able to obtain funds at a reasonable price within a reasonable time period to meet obligations as they become due.
The four methods of increasing liquidity
The board of directors should understand the nature and level of the institution’s liquidity risk, establish the institution’s tolerance for liquidity risk, and approve significant policies related to liquidity management. The board, or a committee of board members, should also ensure that senior management takes the necessary steps to monitor and control liquidity risk, which include the following:
1. Establishing procedures, guidelines, internal controls and limits for managing and monitoring liquidity to ensure adequate liquidity is maintained at all times.
2. Preparing contingency funding plans.
3. Reviewing the institution’s liquidity position on a regular basis and monitoring internal and external factors and events that could have a bearing on the institution’s liquidity.
4. Reviewing periodically the institution’s liquidity strategies, policies, and procedures.
Regardless of the method or combination
The Board of Directors’ responsibilities relating to liquidity
The board of directors should understand the nature and level of the institution’s liquidity risk, establish the institution’s tolerance for liquidity risk, and approve significant policies related to liquidity management. The board, or a committee of board members, should also ensure that senior management takes the necessary steps to monitor and control liquidity risk, which include the following:
- Establishing procedures, guidelines, internal controls and limits for managing and monitoring liquidity to ensure adequate liquidity is maintained at all times.
- Preparing contingency funding plans.
- Reviewing the institution’s liquidity position on a regular basis and monitoring internal and external factors and events that could have a bearing on the institution’s liquidity.
- Reviewing periodically the institution’s liquidity strategies, policies, and procedures.
The 13 items found in a sound Liquidity/Funds Management policy
The following are examples of typical guidelines established by a sound liquidity and funds management policy:
- Provides for the establishment of an asset/liability committee. Define who will be on the committee, what its responsibilities will be, how often it will meet, how it will obtain input from the board, how its results will be reported back to the board, and who has authority to make liquidity and funds management decisions.
- Provides for the periodic review of the bank’s deposit structure. Include the volume and trend of total deposits and the volume and trend of the various types of deposits offered, the maturity distribution of time deposits, rates being paid on each type of deposit, rates being paid by trade area competition, caps on large time deposits, public funds, out-of-area deposits, and any other information needed.
- Provides policies and procedures that address funding concentration in or excessive reliance on any single source or type of funding, such as brokered funds, deposits obtained through the Internet or other types of advertising, and other similar rate sensitive or credit sensitive deposits.
- Provides a method of computing the bank’s cost of funds.
- In conjunction with the bank’s investment policy, determines which types of investments are permitted, the desired mix among those investments, the maturity distribution and the amount of funds that will be available, and reviews pledging opportunities and requirements.
- Conveys the board’s risk tolerance and establishes target liquidity ratios such as loan-to-deposit ratio, longer-term assets funded by less stable funding sources, individual and aggregate limits on borrowed funds by type and source, or a minimum limit on the amount of short-term investments.
- Provides an adequate system of internal controls that ensures the independent and periodic review of the liquidity management process, and compliance with policies and procedures.
- Ensures that senior management and the board are given the means to periodically review compliance with policy guidelines, such as compliance with established limits and legal reserve requirements, and verify that duties are properly segregated.
- Includes a contingency plan that addresses alternative sources of funds if initial projections of funding sources and uses are incorrect or if a liquidity crisis arises. Establishes bank lines and periodically tests their use.
- Establishes a process for measuring and monitoring liquidity, such as generating pro-forma cash flow projections or using models.
- Defines approval procedures for exceptions to policies, limits, and authorizations.
- Provides for tax planning.
- Provides authority and procedures to access wholesale funding sources, and includes guidelines for the types and terms of each wholesale funding source permitted. Defines and establishes a process for measuring and monitoring unused borrowing capacity.
The differences between Asset Management and Liability Management of liquidity – strategy, risks, and costs
Banks relying solely on asset management focus on adjusting the price and availability of credit and the level of liquid assets held to meet cash demands in response to changes in customer asset and liability preferences. As an alternative to using assets to satisfy liquidity needs, these needs may be met through liability sources. Although core deposits continue to be a key liability funding source, many insured depository institutions have experienced difficulty attracting core deposits and are increasingly looking to wholesale funding sources to satisfy funding and liability management needs.
Asset sources of liquidity
Liquidity needs may be met by managing the bank’s asset structure through either the sale or planned pay-down of assets.
Risks of asset-securitization
First, some securitizations have early amortization clauses to protect investors if the performance of the underlying assets does not meet pre-specified criteria. If an early amortization clause is triggered, the issuing institution must begin paying principal to bondholders earlier than originally anticipated and will have to fund new receivables that would have otherwise been transferred to the trust.
Second, if the issuing institution has a large concentration of residual assets, the institution’s overall cash flow might be dependent on the residual cash flows from the performance of the underlying assets. If the performance of the underlying assets is worse than projected, the institution’s overall cash flow will be less than anticipated.
Also, an issuer’s marketplace reputation is crucial to its ability to generate cash from future securitizations. If this reputation is damaged, issuers might not be able to economically securitize assets and generate cash from future sales of loans to the trust.
Finally, residual assets that the issuing institution retains are typically illiquid assets, for which there is no active market. Additionally, these assets are not acceptable collateral to pledge for borrowings
Liability sources of liquidity
Core deposits and Wholesale funding sources include, but are not limited to, Federal funds, public funds, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, the Federal Reserve’s primary credit program, foreign deposits, brokered deposits, and deposits obtained through the Internet or CD listing services.
The five components of an effective deposit management program
- A clearly defined marketing strategy.
- Projections for deposit growth and structure.
- Associated cost and interest rate scenarios.
- Procedures to compare results against projections.
- Steps to revise the plan when needed.
Public Funds
- Public funds are deposit accounts of public bodies, such as State or local municipalities. These types of deposits often must be secured and typically fluctuate on a seasonal basis due to timing differences between tax collections and expenditures. General economic conditions can also be a factor in assessing the volatility of such deposits, since public entities may experience revenue shortfalls in times of economic decline. Though regarded as generally volatile, these accounts can be reasonably stable over time, or their fluctuations quite predictable.
Large Deposits
- large deposits are defined as those concentrations of funds under one control, or payable to one entity, which aggregate 2% or more of the bank’s total deposits. By virtue of their size, such deposits are considered to be potentially volatile liabilities; however, examiners may determine that certain large deposits actually remain relatively stable for long periods.
Negotiable certificates of deposits
- Negotiable certificates of deposit (CDs) warrant special attention as a component of large deposits. They are usually issued by money center or large regional banks in denominations of $1,000,000 or more and may be issued at face value with a stated rate of interest or at a discount similar to U.S. Treasury Bills.
Brokered Deposits
- Deposit brokers have traditionally provided intermediary services for financial institutions and investors. However, the Internet, certificate of deposit listing services, and other automated services enable investors who focus on yield to easily identify high-yielding deposit sources. These are highly volitile funds.
Secured and preferred deposits
- Secured and preferred deposits impose pledging requirements upon banks.
International Funding
- As in the case of domestic sources of funds, international funding may exist in a number of forms. The most common is the Eurodollar market. Eurodollar deposits are dollar-denominated deposits taken by a bank’s overseas branch or its international banking facility (IBF).