Must know Flashcards
Section 129A and subsection (5)
Offence of inducing someone to commit sexual connection, in response to an implied or explicit threat that does not involve force.
Nature of threat:
- accusation or disclosure about misconduct of a person, likely to damage the reputation of that person.
- make threat, improper use of another power of authority, an occupational or vocational position held by the person making the threat or, a commercial relations between the person making the threat and the person consenting.
Section 130, what is incest
Sexual connection is incest if-
(a) between 2 people whose relationship is that of parent and child, siblings, half-siblings, grandparent and grandchild, and
(b) person charged knows of the relationship.
Relates to any over 16.
Not included (Step parent or step child).
Section 131, sexual conduct with a dependant family member.
Sexual conduct with dependant family member
(1) & (2) A person has / attempts / sexual connection with a dependent family member under the age of 18
years.
(3) A person does an indecent act on a dependent family member under the age of 18 years.
Dependant family member
Person is a dependent family member:
(a) if the other person has power or authority over him or her, and is—
(i) his or her parent, step-parent, foster parent, guardian, uncle, or aunt; or
(ii) a parent, step-parent, or foster parent of a person described in subparagraph (i); or
(iii) a child of his or her parent or step-parent; or
(iv) the spouse or de facto partner of a person described in subparagraph (i) or subparagraph (ii) or subparagraph (iii); or
(b) if they are members of the same family, whanau, or other culturally recognised family group, and the other person—
(i) is not a person referred to in paragraph (a); but
(ii) has a responsibility for, or significant role in, his or her care or upbringing; or
(c) if he or she is living with the other person as a member of the other person’s family, and the other person is not a person referred to in paragraph (a), but has—
(i) power or authority over him or her; and
(ii) a responsibility for, or significant role in, his or her care or upbringing.
Police need to prove that the offender, in addition to having one of the roles set out, had power or authority over the dependent person.
S131B, meeting with YP following sexual grooming?
Meeting young person following sexual grooming:
(1) Every person is liable:
(a) having met or communicated with a person under the age of 16 years on an earlier occasion, he or she takes one of the following actions:
(i) intentionally meets the young person:
(ii) travels with the intention of meeting the young person:
(iii) arranges for or persuades the young person to travel with the intention of meeting him or her.
(2) It is a defence to a charge under subsection (1) if the person charged proves that,—
(a) before the time he or she took the action concerned, he or she had taken reasonable steps to find out whether the young person was of or over the age of 16 years: and
(b) at the time he or she took the action concerned, he or she believed on reasonable grounds that the young person was of or over the age of 16 years.
For purposes of S.138, what is a significant impairment?
sexual exploitation of person with significant impairment
S.138, (1) & (2) A person who has / attempts to have exploitative sexual connection with a person with a significant impairment.
(6) A significant impairment is an intellectual, mental, or physical condition or impairment (or a combination of 2 or more intellectual, mental, or physical conditions or impairments) affects a person to such an extent that it significantly impairs the person’s capacity—
(a) understand nature of sexual conduct; or
(b) understand nature of decisions about sexual conduct; or
(c) foresee consequences of decisions about sexual conduct; or
(d) communicate decisions about sexual conduct.
S.144 acts committed outside of NZ
S.144: This section allows for the prosecution of a New Zealand citizen who commits an offence under s132 or s134, pursuant to s144A if the act was committed outside of New Zealand.
S.144B: No charging document may be filed for an offence against section 144A of this Act except with the consent of the Attorney-General.
S.44 Evidence Act 2006
S.44
Generally, no evidence or questions (except with the judge’s permission) can be put to the complainant about their sexual experience with any person other than the defendant.
However, s44(1) is subject to the propensity rule in s40(3). Evidence of the complainant’s propensity to act in a certain way with the defendant, including sexually, may be offered as evidence but only if the judge grants permission.
S.87 Evidence Act 2006
Section 87 of the Evidence Act 2006 protects a witness from having to state their address and having questions put to them about that information. This includes not only the name and number of the street, but also the name of the town or community the witness lived in.
However, these details may be disclosed where the judge determines that they are directly relevant to the facts in issue and that to exclude them would be contrary to the interest of justice.
S.88 Evidence Act 2006
Section 88 (Restriction on disclosure of complainant’s occupation in sexual cases) of the Evidence Act 2006 protects a complainant from having questions put to them or to a witness about the complainant’s occupation, or having evidence given, or statements/remarks made about the complainant’s occupation.
However, an application can be made to the judge to disclose this information in court.
S.121 Evidence Act 2006
Section 121 (Corroboration) of the Evidence Act 2006 provides that, in any criminal proceeding, the complainant’s evidence does not have to be corroborated. This is especially important in cases of a sexual nature, where the offence is often committed with no independent evidence to corroborate the complainant’s account.
“Corroborate” is not defined in the Crimes Act 1961. Ordinary dictionary terms means, to strengthen or support with other evidence, to make more certain.
S.35 Evidence Act 2006
Section 35(2) previous consistent statement admissible to the extent that if it is necessary to respond to a challenge to the witness’s veracity or accuracy, the challenge must be based on:
- a previous inconsistent statement of the witness, or
- a claim that the witness recently invented evidence.
Advantages of visually recorded evidence?
The advantages of visually recording interviews can include:
- greater quality and quantity of information obtained
- minimising trauma to the witness by simplifying the process and having their interview played as their evidence in chief
- reducing contamination by the interviewer through the process of transposing the interview into a statement
- providing a valuable means for the witness to refresh their memory before judicial proceedings.
Why are Video/DVD recording of child interviews the best way to meet both the child needs and interests and the interests of justice?
- the interview process is focused on the child and allows them to state clearly and freely what (if anything) has happened according to the rules of evidence
- the recorded interview can be used for the basis of an investigation, subsequent criminal prosecution and/or care and protection purposes
- it avoids the need to re-interview the child for different purposes.
Section 103, Evidence Act 2006, grounds for Witness to give evidence in alternative way?
(a) age or maturity of the witness:
(b) physical, intellectual, psychological, or psychiatric impairment of the witness:
(c) trauma suffered by the witness:
(d) witness’s fear of intimidation:
(e) linguistic or cultural background or religious beliefs of the witness:
(f) nature of the proceeding:
(g) nature of the evidence that the witness is expected to give:
(h) relationship of the witness to any party to the proceeding:
(i) absence or likely absence of the witness from New Zealand:
(j) any other ground likely to promote the purpose of the Act.
S.107 Evidence Act 2006, Alternative ways of giving evidence by child witnesses in criminal proceedings
(1) A child witness, when giving evidence in a criminal proceeding, is entitled to give evidence in 1 or more alternative ways so that—
(a) the witness gives evidence in 1 or more of the following ways:
(i) by a video record made before the hearing of the proceeding:
(ii) while in the courtroom but unable to see the defendant or some other specified person:
(iii) from an appropriate place outside the courtroom, either in New Zealand or elsewhere:
Whose responsibility is it to get transcripts prepared and when must it be done by?
It is the responsibility of the O/C Case to ensure the transcript is prepared, including all noticeable non-verbal communication, and is accurate.
Police must ensure that a typed transcript of a video record to be used in proceedings is given to the defendant or defendant’s lawyer as soon as practicable after the defendant has pleaded not guilty.
If the matter is to be tried summarily, the transcript must be prepared as soon as reasonably practicable after the defendant has entered a not guilty plea.
Section 195A relates to ?
Section 195A, Crimes Act 1961 imposes criminal liability in some situations where it is known a child (or vulnerable adult) is at risk of harm but where no action is taken.
The offence applies to:
• members of the same household as the victim
• people who are staff members of any hospital, institution or residence where the victim resides.
Criminal liability will arise if such a person has frequent contact with a child (or vulnerable adult) and:
• knows (mens rea) the victim is at risk of death, grievous bodily harm or sexual assault as a result of the acts or omissions of another person; and
• fails (actus reus) to take reasonable steps to protect the victim from that risk.
Where the person “at risk” is a child it will need to be shown that they were:
• under the age of 18 at the time of the offence, and
• that the defendant was over the age of 18, and,
• the defendant, by virtue of being a member of the same household as the victim or a staff member in a hospital or institution or residence where the victim resides had “frequent contact” with them, and
• the defendant had knowledge of the risk of harm to the child
When interacting with victims of sexual offences, what actions should you take to provide a safe and secure environment in which they may regain some control of their lives?
- Conduct your dealings in a sensitive manner. Complaints from victims frequently relate to police not being as sensitive to the victim’s needs as they could be.
- Accept they are telling the truth until/unless there is evidence to prove the contrary.
- Listen to what they tell you, giving them an opportunity to tell their account in their words, even to just vent their feelings.
- Establish whether they require medical attention.
- Treat them courteously.
- Explain the process you are following and why you need to follow that process and ask certain questions.
- Advise them of the local counselling services available.
It is important to preserve trace evidence in sexual assault cases. List four things that victims should refrain from (where possible) before a medical examination.
- eating or drinking
- going to the toilet (if necessary, use a toxicology kit to capture urine and ask victims not to wipe)
- washing or showering
- washing their hands or biting their fingernails
- changing clothing
- smoking
- brushing or combing hair
- brushing teeth or rinsing their mouth.
List the points that you would cover with a victim to explain the medical forensic examination procedure.
− that the examination will be conducted by a medical forensic practitioner specially trained in examining victims of sexual assault
− the benefits of a full medical forensic examination including:
• the potential benefit to their physical, sexual and mental health
• how the examination can help Police obtain evidence to apprehend the offender
− the expected time for the examination and, if appropriate, possible outcomes of the examination.
List the three areas to consider when determining “seriousness of physical abuse”.
There are three areas to consider in determining whether physical abuse is serious and therefore meets the threshold for referral as a CPP case under this protocol:
− the action of the abuse
− the injury inflicted, and
− the circumstances (factors of the case).