Murder And Manslaughter Offences Flashcards
S167 CA61 Murder
Culpable homicide is murder in each of the following cases:
(a) if the offender means to cause the death of the person killed.
(b) if the offender means to cause to the person killed any bodily injury that is known to the offender to be likely to cause death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not.
(c) if the offender means to cause death, or, being so reckless as aforesaid, means to cause such bodily injury as aforesaid to one person, and by accident or mistake kills another person, though he does not mean to hurt the person killed.
(d) if the offender for any unlawful object does an act that he knows to be likely to cause death, thereby kills any person, though he may have desired that his object should be effected without hurting any one.
S168 (1) CA61 Further definition of murder.
(1) Culpable homicide is also murder in each of the following cases, whether the offender means or does not mean death to ensue, or knows or does not know that death is likely to ensue:
(a) If he means to cause grevious bodily injury for the purpose of facilitating the commission of the offences mentioned in subsection 2 of this section, or facilitating the flight or avoiding the detection of the offender upon the commission or attempted commission thereof or for the purpose of resisting lawful apprehension in respect of any offence whatsoever, and death ensues from such injury.
(b) If he administers any stupefying or overpowering thing for any of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from the effects thereof:
(c) If he by any means wilfully stops the breath of any person for any of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from such stopping of breath.
Define deliberate act?
Intent means that the act or omission must be done deliberately, it must be more than involuntary or accidental.
What must be proven for a charge under S167?
The defendant
- intended to cause death, or
- knew that death was likely to ensue, or
- was reckless that death would ensue.
If such intent is not present then the offence is manslaughter unless its infanticide (S178)
R v Harney
Recklessness means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk. In New Zealand it involves proof that the consequences complained of could well happen, together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of the risk.
What must you prove for a charge under 167(b)?
The defendant:
- intended to cause bodily injury to the deceased
- knew the injury was likely to cause death
- was reckless as to whether death ensued or not
R v Piri
Recklessness involve a conscious, deliberate risk taking. The degree of risk of death foreseen by the accused under either S167(b) or (d) must be more than negligible or remote. The accused must recognise a real or substantial risk that death would be caused.
R v Desmond
Not only must the object be unlawful, but also the accused must know that his act is likely to cause death. It must be shown that his knowledge accompanied the act causing death.
167(a)
(a) if the offender means to cause the death of the person killed.
167(b)
(b) if the offender means to cause to the person killed any bodily injury that is known to the offender to be likely to cause death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not.
167(c)
(c) if the offender means to cause death, or, being so reckless as aforesaid, means to cause such bodily injury as aforesaid to one person, and by accident or mistake kills another person, though he does not mean to hurt the person killed.
167(d)
(d) if the offender for any unlawful object does an act that he knows to be likely to cause death, thereby kills any person, though he may have desired that his object should be effected without hurting any one.
168(1)(a)
(1) Culpable homicide is also murder in each of the following cases, whether the offender means or does not mean death to ensue, or knows or does not know that death is likely to ensue:
(a) If he means to cause grevious bodily injury for the purpose of facilitating the commission of the offences mentioned in subsection 2 of this section, or facilitating the flight or avoiding the detection of the offender upon the commission or attempted commission thereof or for the purpose of resisting lawful apprehension in respect of any offence whatsoever, and death ensues from such injury.
168(1)(b)
(1) Culpable homicide is also murder in each of the following cases, whether the offender means or does not mean death to ensue, or knows or does not know that death is likely to ensue:
(b) If he administers any stupefying or overpowering thing for any of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from the effects thereof:
168(1)(c)
(1) Culpable homicide is also murder in each of the following cases, whether the offender means or does not mean death to ensue, or knows or does not know that death is likely to ensue:
(c) If he by any means wilfully stops the breath of any person for any of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from such stopping of breath.
S66(2)
Where 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute an unlawful purpose, and to assist each other therein, each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known as a probable consequence of the prosecution of the common purpose.
What must a secondary party know to be convicted of murder under S66?
Must know it was a probable consequence that the principal might do an act that would, if death ensued, bring their conduct within the terms of S168.
It is not necessary to show they knew death was a probable consequence of their carrying out their primary purpose.