Murder And Manslaughter Offences Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

S167 CA61 Murder

A

Culpable homicide is murder in each of the following cases:

(a) if the offender means to cause the death of the person killed.
(b) if the offender means to cause to the person killed any bodily injury that is known to the offender to be likely to cause death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not.
(c) if the offender means to cause death, or, being so reckless as aforesaid, means to cause such bodily injury as aforesaid to one person, and by accident or mistake kills another person, though he does not mean to hurt the person killed.
(d) if the offender for any unlawful object does an act that he knows to be likely to cause death, thereby kills any person, though he may have desired that his object should be effected without hurting any one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

S168 (1) CA61 Further definition of murder.

A

(1) Culpable homicide is also murder in each of the following cases, whether the offender means or does not mean death to ensue, or knows or does not know that death is likely to ensue:
(a) If he means to cause grevious bodily injury for the purpose of facilitating the commission of the offences mentioned in subsection 2 of this section, or facilitating the flight or avoiding the detection of the offender upon the commission or attempted commission thereof or for the purpose of resisting lawful apprehension in respect of any offence whatsoever, and death ensues from such injury.
(b) If he administers any stupefying or overpowering thing for any of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from the effects thereof:
(c) If he by any means wilfully stops the breath of any person for any of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from such stopping of breath.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define deliberate act?

A

Intent means that the act or omission must be done deliberately, it must be more than involuntary or accidental.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What must be proven for a charge under S167?

A

The defendant

  • intended to cause death, or
  • knew that death was likely to ensue, or
  • was reckless that death would ensue.

If such intent is not present then the offence is manslaughter unless its infanticide (S178)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Harney

A

Recklessness means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk. In New Zealand it involves proof that the consequences complained of could well happen, together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of the risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What must you prove for a charge under 167(b)?

A

The defendant:

  • intended to cause bodily injury to the deceased
  • knew the injury was likely to cause death
  • was reckless as to whether death ensued or not
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Piri

A

Recklessness involve a conscious, deliberate risk taking. The degree of risk of death foreseen by the accused under either S167(b) or (d) must be more than negligible or remote. The accused must recognise a real or substantial risk that death would be caused.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Desmond

A

Not only must the object be unlawful, but also the accused must know that his act is likely to cause death. It must be shown that his knowledge accompanied the act causing death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

167(a)

A

(a) if the offender means to cause the death of the person killed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

167(b)

A

(b) if the offender means to cause to the person killed any bodily injury that is known to the offender to be likely to cause death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

167(c)

A

(c) if the offender means to cause death, or, being so reckless as aforesaid, means to cause such bodily injury as aforesaid to one person, and by accident or mistake kills another person, though he does not mean to hurt the person killed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

167(d)

A

(d) if the offender for any unlawful object does an act that he knows to be likely to cause death, thereby kills any person, though he may have desired that his object should be effected without hurting any one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

168(1)(a)

A

(1) Culpable homicide is also murder in each of the following cases, whether the offender means or does not mean death to ensue, or knows or does not know that death is likely to ensue:
(a) If he means to cause grevious bodily injury for the purpose of facilitating the commission of the offences mentioned in subsection 2 of this section, or facilitating the flight or avoiding the detection of the offender upon the commission or attempted commission thereof or for the purpose of resisting lawful apprehension in respect of any offence whatsoever, and death ensues from such injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

168(1)(b)

A

(1) Culpable homicide is also murder in each of the following cases, whether the offender means or does not mean death to ensue, or knows or does not know that death is likely to ensue:
(b) If he administers any stupefying or overpowering thing for any of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from the effects thereof:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

168(1)(c)

A

(1) Culpable homicide is also murder in each of the following cases, whether the offender means or does not mean death to ensue, or knows or does not know that death is likely to ensue:
(c) If he by any means wilfully stops the breath of any person for any of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from such stopping of breath.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

S66(2)

A

Where 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute an unlawful purpose, and to assist each other therein, each of them is a party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known as a probable consequence of the prosecution of the common purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What must a secondary party know to be convicted of murder under S66?

A

Must know it was a probable consequence that the principal might do an act that would, if death ensued, bring their conduct within the terms of S168.
It is not necessary to show they knew death was a probable consequence of their carrying out their primary purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the punishment for murder?

A

S172 CA61

(1) Every one who commits murder is liable to imprisonment for life.
(2) Subsection 1 is subject to section 102 Sentencing act 2002

19
Q

S102 Sentencing Act 2002

A

(1) An offender who is convicted of murder must be sentenced to imprisonment for life unless given the circumstances of the offence and the offender, a sentence of imprisonment for life is manifestly unjust.
(2) If a court does not impose a sentence of imprisonment for life on an offender convicted of murder, it must give written reasons for not doing so.

20
Q

S173

A

Attempted murder

21
Q

S72(1) Attempts

A

(1) every one who, having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not.

22
Q

S72(2)

A

The question whether an act done or omitted with intent to commit an offence is or is not only preparation for the commission of that offence, and to remote to constitute and attempt to commit it, is a question of law.

23
Q

S72(3)

A

An act done or omitted with intent to commit an offence may constitute an attempt if it is immediately or proximately connected with the intended offence, whether or not there was any act unequivocally showing the intent to commit that offence.

24
Q

R v Murphy (attempts)

A

When proving an attempt to commit an offence it must be shown that the accused’s intention was to commit the substantive offence. For attempted murder the crown must show an actual intent to kill.

25
Q

Explain the “all but” rule in relation to attempts?

A

The defendant must have started to commit the whole offence and have gone beyond the phase of mere preparation.

26
Q

R v Harpur

A

The Court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point where the conduct in question stops. The defendants conduct may be considered in its entirety. Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant though not determinative.

27
Q

attempted murder?

A

S173 CA61

Everyone who attempts to commit murder is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years.

28
Q

Counselling or attempting to procure murder?

A
S174 CA61
10 years
Everyone who
Incites, counsels, or attempts to procure
Any person
To murder any other person
In New Zealand,
When that murder is not in fact committed.
29
Q

Conspiracy to murder?

A
S175(1) CA61
10 years
Everyone who conspires or agrees
With any person
To murder any other person
Whether the murder is to take place in New Zealand or elsewhere.
30
Q

Accessory after the fact to murder?

A

S176 CA61
7 years
Everyone who is an accessory after the fact to murder.

31
Q

Define accessory after the fact?

A

S71(1)CA61
Knowing any person to have been a party to the offence, receives, comforts, or assists that person or tampers with or actively suppresses any evidence against him, in order for him to escape after arrest or to avoid arrest or conviction.

32
Q

R v Mane

A

For a person to be an accessory the offence must be complete at the time of the criminal involvement. One cannot be convicted of being an accessory after the fact of murder when the actus reus of the alleged criminal conduct was wholly completed before the offence of homicide was completed.

33
Q

Voluntary manslaughter?

A

Mitigating circumstances, such as a suicide pact, reduce what would otherwise be murder to manslaughter. There is an intent to kill or gbh.

34
Q

Involuntary manslaughter?

A

Covers those types of unlawful killing in which the death is caused by an unlawful act or gross negligence. There is no intent to kill or gbh.

35
Q

Common instances of manslaughter?

A

Killing in a sudden fight.
Manslaughter by unlawful act.
Manslaughter by negligence

36
Q

What must be you consider in regard to killing in a sudden fight?

A

Self defence.

The requisite mens rea for a murder charge.

37
Q

What is the four point test for manslaughter by an unlawful act (Newbury and Jones)?

A

1: the defendant must Intentionally do an act.
2: the act must be unlawful
3: the act must be dangerous
4: the act must cause death.

38
Q

Examples of manslaughter by negligence?

A
Negligence while in charge of or using:
Trains
Factory machinery
Mines
Motor vehicles
Ships
Weapons 
while administering medical or surgical treatment.
39
Q

Define negligence?

A

Not defined by statute, but prosecution must prove a very high degree of negligence or gross negligence.

40
Q

S150A(1) CA61 - standard of care applicable to persons under legal duties or performing unlawful acts.

A

(1) this section applies in respect of -
(a) the legal duties specified in any of sections 151, 152, 153, 155, 156, and 157; and
(b) an unlawful act referred to in section 160 where the unlawful act relied on requires proof of negligence or is a strict liability offence.

41
Q

S150A (2)CA61

A

(2) For the purposes of this part, a person is criminally responsible for omitting to discharge or perform a legal duty, or performing an unlawful act, to which this section applies only if, in the circumstances, the omission or unlawful act is a major departure from the standard of care expected of a reasonable person to whom that legal duty applies or who performs the unlawful act.

42
Q

The major departure test?

A

Requires a high degree of negligence corresponding to the common law standard of gross negligence.

43
Q

Objective test for negligence (R v Adomako)?

A

Having regard to the risk of death involved, the conduct of the defendant was so bad in all the circumstances as to amount to a criminal act or omission.

44
Q

Punishment for manslaughter?

A

S177 CA61

Life imprisonment.