Murder and Manslaughter Offences Flashcards
Murder Defined
Section 167 CA61
s167
Culpable homicide is murder in each of the following cases:
(a) If the offender means to cause death of the person killed:
(b) If the offender means to cause to the person killed, any bodily injury that is known to the offender to be likely to cause death, and is reckless whether death ensues or not:
(c) If the offender means to cause death, or, being so reckless as aforesaid, means to cause such bodily injury as aforesaid to one person, and by accident or mistake kills another person, though he does not mean to hurt the person killed:
(d) If the offender for any unlawful object does an act that he knows will likely to cause death, and thereby kills any person, though he may have desired that his object should be effected without hurting anyone.
Further Definition of Murder
Section 168 CA61
s168
(1) Culpable homicide is also murder under each of the following cases, whether the offender means or does not mean death to ensue, or knows or does not know that death is likely to ensue:
(a) If he [means to cause grievous bodily injury] for the purpose of facilitating the commission of any of the offences mentioned in subsection (2) of this section, or [facilitate the flight] or [avoiding the detection] of the offender upon the [commission or attempted commission] thereof, or for the [purpose of resisting lawful apprehension] in respect of any offence whatsoever, and [death ensues for such injury]:
(b) If he administers any stupefying or overpowering thing for any of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from the effects thereof:
(c) If he by any means wilfully stops the breath of any person for any of the purposes aforesaid, and death ensues from such stopping of breath.
Intent
Definition
In a criminal law context there are two specific types of intention in an offence. Firstly there must be an intention to commit the act and secondly, an intention to get a specific result.
Recklessness
R v Harney
Recklessness means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk. In New Zealand it involves proof that the consequence complained of could well happen, together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of risk.
Reckless
R v Piri
Recklessness involves a conscious, deliberate risk taken. The degree of risk of death foreseen by the accused under s167(b) or (d) must be more than negligible or remote. The accused must recognise a “real or substantial risk” that death would be caused.
Killing in Pursuit of an Unlawful Objective
Section 167(d) CA61
Death caused by blowing up a prison wall to liberate prisoners.
R v Desmond
Not only must the objective be unlawful, but also the accused must know that his act is likely to cause death. It must be shown that his knowledge accompanied the act causing death.
Murder Committed in the Execution of the Common Purpose
Section 66(2) CA61
s66 Parties to Offences
(2) Where two or more person form a common intention to commit an offence and assist each other therein, each of them is party to every offence committed by anyone of them in the commission of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was a probable consequence arising from the principle offence.
s168 Extended Definition of Murder
Joint Responsibility
Whether reliance is placed on s66(1) or s66(2), it is not necessary to show that the secondary knew the death was a probable consequence of their carrying out the primary purpose. Rather it must be shown that the secondary party knew it was a probable consequence that the principle might do an act that would, if death issued, bring their conduct within the terms of section 168.
Punishment for Murder
Section 172 CA61
S172 Punishment for Murder
(1) Everyone one who commits murder is liable to imprisonment for life.
(2) Subsection (1) is subject to 102 of the Sentencing Act 2002.
Attempt to Murder
Section 173 CA61
With an attempted murder charge (s173) Crown is required to establish the mens rea and acts reus as set out in s72:
Attempting to commit an offence
Section 72 Crimes Act 1961
(1) Everyone who, having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his objective, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not.
(2) The question whether an act done or omitted with intent to commit an offence is or is not only preparation for the commission of that offence, and too remote to constitute an attempt to commit it, is a question of law.
(3) An act done or omitted with intent to commit an offence may constitute an attempt if it is immediately or proximately connected with the intended offence, whether or not there was any act unequivocally showing the intent to commit that offence.
Intent Must be Established
R v Murphy
R v Murphy
When proving an attempt to commit an offence, it must be shown that the accused’s intention was to commit the substantive offence. For example, in a case of attempted murder it is necessary for the Crown to establish an actual intent to kill.
____
Therefore, this requirement on the Crown means that attempted murder is one of the most difficult offences in the Crimes Act to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
s72(2) CA61
s72(3) CA61
s72(2) Section 72(2) Proximity is a question of law; it is a question that is decided by the Judge based on the assumption that the facts of the case are proved.
_____
s(72(3)
Act(s) must be immediately or sufficiently proximate to the full offence:
Effectively, the accused must have started to commit the full offence and have gone beyond the phase of mere preparation - the “all but” rule.
Several acts together may constitute an attempt:
R v Harpur
R v Harpur
The defendant’s conduct may be viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops and may be considered in it’s entirety. Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant, though not determinative.
Proximity
Do the facts show mere preparation, or are the defendant’s acts or omissions immediately or sufficiently proximate to the intended offence?
Test for proximity:
- Has the offender done anything more than getting himself into a position from which he could embark on an actual attempt?
- Has the offender actually commenced the execution; that is to say, has he taken a step in the actual crime itself?
Punishment for Attempted Murder
Section 173CA61
s173 Attempt to Murder
Every one who attempts to commit murder is liable imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years.