Murder Flashcards
Actus reus
The unlawful killing of a reasonable person under the king or queen’s peace
AR - unlawful
Without consent, cannot consent to GBH or death (Brown)
AR - reasonable person
Not a foetus (A-G Ref), or someone who’s brain dead (Malcherek and Steel)
AR - king or queens peace
Not at war
Intervening act - medical treatment
Must be palpably wrong (Jordan)
Intervening act - V’s own actions
V’s action’s can be intervening act if they;re unreasonable (Roberts)
Mens rea
With malice, aforethought, express or implied
MR - malice
Desire to harm, compassionate killings still murder (Gray)
MR - aforethought
Thinking about actions before doing them, can be as little as seconds
MR - express
Intent to kill (Mohan)
MR - implied
Intent to cause GBH - enough for MR of murder (Vickers)
Foresight of consequences
Can prove direct intention (Nedrick)
- would a reasonable person see outcome as a virtual certainty
- did D realise outcome was a virtual certainty
Sentence
Mandatory life
R v Brown
Cannot consent to GBH or death
A-G Ref
Foetus is not a reasonable person
Malcherek and Steel
Someone brain dead is not a reasonable person
Paggett
Factual Causation
Kimsey
Legal causation
R v Jordan
For medical treatment to be an intervening act it must be palpably wrong
R v Roberts
For V’s own actions to be an intervening act they must be unreasonable
R v Gray
Compassionate killings are still murder
Mohan
Intent to kill
Vickers
Intent to cause GBH is enough for MR of murder
Nedrick
Foresight of consequences can be used to prove direct intention
What type of intention is needed for a murder conviction?
Direct
What partial defences can be used for murder?
Loss of control, diminished responsibility
What would a partial defence reduce a murder conviction to?
Voluntary manslaughter
Sentence for a voluntary manslaughter conviction?
Max. life