Murder Flashcards

1
Q

How did Lord Coke define murder?

A

The unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being under the Queen’s peace with malice aforethought, express or implied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which defence can be used for a charge of murder?

A

Self-defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which defence cannot be used for a charge of murder?

A

Duress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the actus reus of murder?

A

The unlawful killing of a human being under the Queen’s peace.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How can murder be committed?

A

By an act or omission.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Can any murder by any British citizen be tried in the English courts?

A

Yes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Can the victim be a foetus?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give the facts of Attorney-General’s Reference (No 3 of 1994) (1997).

A

D stabbed his pregnant girlfriend causing her to give birth prematurely, the baby died. D was not charged with the baby’s murder as it was a foetus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Can the victim be brain-dead?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does under the Queen’s peace mean?

A

Killing enemies in war is not unlawful, however killing a prisoner of war is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What may be used in self-defence?

A

Reasonable force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When might killing be necessary?

A

To save one of a pair of conjoined twins, as in Re A (conjoined twins) (2000).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is strong evidence that force used in self-defence is reasonable?

A

The fact that the defendant had only done what he honestly and instinctively thought was necessary in a moment of unexpected anguish.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

On which facts is the defendant judged when considering a defence of self-defence?

A

On the facts as he believed them to be, even if he was mistaken.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 allow for?

A

The fact that the defendant is under stress and cannot be expected to precisely calculate the exact amount of force necessary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If excessive force is used, will the defence be successful?

A

No.

17
Q

Give the facts of Clegg (1995)

A

D was a soldier on duty at a checkpoint who shot at a speeding car three times as it approached and once as it drove off, killing a rear passenger. Clegg could not use the defence as there was no threat at the time of the last shot.

18
Q

What is the mens rea of murder?

A

Malice aforethought, express or implied.

19
Q

Which case decided that you do not need to have intention to kill to be convicted of murder?

A

Vickers (1981)

20
Q

Does transferred malice apply to murder?

A

Yes.

21
Q

What does the defendant have to foresee in order to be convicted of murder?

A

He has to foresee that his acts would cause death or serious injury.

22
Q

What are some problems with the law on murder?

A
  1. The law developed bit-by-bit and not as a whole.
  2. The serious harm rule makes the law on murder too wide-ranging.
  3. No defence when excessive force is used is too harsh.
  4. No defence of duress is unfair.
  5. The mandatory life sentence does not distinguish between different levels of murder.
23
Q

What has the Law Commission suggested to reform murder?

A

Division of the offence into first and second degree murder, where first degree is intent to kill and second degree is intent to seriously harm.