Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Law > Murder > Flashcards

Murder Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

What four ways can mens rea be shown for murder?

A
  1. Intent to kill
  2. Intent to cause serious bodily harm (jdx)
  3. The presence of a depraved heart (i.e. recklessness)
  4. When the killing occurs in the courts of committing a statutorily enumerated felony
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do we show deliberation?

A

Planning, motive, and manner of killing (calculated or frenzied)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the three ways 2nd degree can be elevated to 1st Degree?

A
  1. The murder was committed using certain statutorily defined means (e.g. poisoning)
  2. The murder occurred during the commission or attempted commission of a statutorily enumerated felony
  3. The intentional killing was also premeditated and deliberated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how do we show premeditation?

A

quantity of time sufficient for deliberation. jdx on more than an instant or not depends on statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 4 elements of provocation?

A
  1. D was actually provoked (subjective);
  2. The reasonable person in D’s shoes (given facts and circumstances) would have been provoked (legally adequate provocation) (objective);
  3. D didn’t have sufficient time to cool off (subjective); and
  4. The reasonable person in D’s shoes wouldn’t have cooled off (objective).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is 2nd degree murder moderated to voluntary manslaugher?

A

Provocation or imperfect self-defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Felony Murder Limitations

A
  1. The Inherently Dangerous Limitation
  2. The Res Gestae Limitation
  3. The Merger Limitation
  4. The Agency Limitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are common mens rea terms?

A

knowingly, intentionally, recklessly, negligently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 5 duties act?

A
  1. Special status
  2. Civil obligation (contract)
  3. Creation of risk of harm
  4. Voluntary assumption of care and seclusion of person from others
  5. Imposed by statute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What two ways is intent defined as?

A

Conscious object: If an actor’s conscious object or purpose is to cause a certain result or to engage in certain prohibited conduct

Knowledge to a virtual certainty: An actor intends a social harm if an actor knows to a virtual certainty their actions will cause the social harm or that they are engaging in prohibited conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are two shortcuts for proving intent?

A
  1. Natural and probable consequences
  2. deadly weapon rule: deadly weapon directed at vital human body part
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How is knowledge shown?

A

the defendant was “aware” of a fact or “correctly believed” that the fact exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 4 factors for determining if a a statute has strict liability?

A
  1. new crime
  2. public welfare offense (aimed at protecting public)
  3. penalties are relatively light or non-serious
  4. stigma is relatively low
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which kind of intent crimes are voluntary intoxication available for?

A

specific intent. It negates the intent (e.g. 1st degree murder negates prem. delib).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the elements for mistake of fact for specific intent crime?

A

Honest(good faith) mistaken belief that negates mens rea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the elements for mistake of fact for a general intent crime?

A

Honeslty(subjective) and reasonably(objective) mistaken about a fact that negates mens rea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What elements are needed for voluntary manslaughter?

A

(1) Intent to kill and (2) killed in heat of passion or imperfect self defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Does response to provocation need to be sudden?

A

Most jdxs yes. Others allow for cumulative provocation by the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a reasonable person?

A

an ordinary person of average intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the 4 jdxs splits we need to be aware of?

A

Intervening cause, defense of habitation, attempts, and entrapment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the mens rea for depraved heart murder?

A

Gross recklessnes: the defendant was subjectively aware that his or her conduct created a substantial and unjustified rick of death, yet the defendant consciously disregards the risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the mens rea for involuntary manslaughter?

A

Gross negligence: the defendant should have been aware that his or her conduct created a substantial and unjustifiable risk of death but was unaware and engaged in that conduct. Was the risk of such a nature and degree that the failure to be aware of it constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person in the D’s situation would exercise? EX. street racing or drunk driving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the three elements of larceny?

A
  1. Intentional
  2. Trespassory (w/o permission) taking and carrying away of another’s personal property
  3. with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is larceny by trick?

A

Same as larceny but the defendant obtains permission through fraud or deceit

25
Q

What kind of murder crimes did we learn about?

A

1st Degree
2nd Degree
Depraved Heart Murder
Voluntary Manslaughter
Involuntary Manslaughter

26
Q

What are the 3 elements of embezzlement?

A
  1. Intentional
  2. Conversion of the property of another (serios interference with owner’s ability to use property)
  3. By someone who is already in lawful possession of the property (fiduciary)
27
Q

What are the four elements of larceny by false pretenses?

A
  1. Knowingly
  2. Making a false statement of fact
  3. With the intent to defraud the victime
  4. The victime relies on the false statement to pass title(ownership) to the defendant.
28
Q

What are the elements of burglary?

A
  1. Intentional
  2. Trespassory entering of a structure
  3. With intent to commit a felony therein
    includes structure in curtilage
29
Q

What are the elements of robbery?

A
  1. Intentionally
  2. Taking and carrying away the property of another from their person or immediate presence
  3. By force or threat of force
30
Q

What are theft crimes we learned?

A

Larceny
Larceny by trick
Embezzlement
Larceny by False Pretenses
Burglary (usually by larceny)
Robbery

31
Q

What are the elements of criminal attempt?

A
  1. Whether acts go beyond mere preparation for the crime
  2. Intent to perform acts that constitute the actus reus, and
  3. Intent to commit the underlying offense
32
Q

What kind of intent do attempt crimes have?

A

Specific intent

33
Q

What are the two common law tests for beyond mere preparation?

A
  1. Unequivocal manifestation of intent to commit crime: how much remains to be done before the crime is committed
  2. Dangerous proximity: how much has already occurred
34
Q

What is the jurisdictional split for independent interventing cause?

A
  • If the IC is independent, D is not the legal cause unless;
    o The IC was foreseeable (majority rule); or
    o The social harm was foreseeable (minority rule).
35
Q

If a voluntary act is not the direct cause of the social harm, what two kinds of intervening causes (IC) are there?

A
  • Is the IC dependent on (responsive to) D’s act (or omission), or independent of (coincidental to) D’s act or omission?
36
Q

If the the IC is dependent, is the voluntary act the legal cause of the social harm?

A

Yes, unless the IC is extremely bizarre or unusual

37
Q

If the IC is independent, is the voluntary act the legal cause?

A

No, unless the IC was foreseeable (maj. rule) or
The social harm was foreseeable (min. rule)

38
Q

How is 2nd Degree Felony Murder determined?

A

By judges as a matter of law. Statutory interpretation is used to determine which felonies will serve as the predicate for felony murder.

39
Q

How is 1st Degree Felony Murder determined?

A

Statutorily. Enumerated by legislature. No statutory interpretation required.

40
Q

What are the elements of 1st degree felony murder?

A
  1. Proving the elements of the underlying felony (serves as mens rea)
  2. actus rea, causation
41
Q

What are the elements of 2nd degree felony murder?

A
  1. interpret the statute if within the 4 limits ( inherently dangerous, res gestae, merger doctrine, agency rule i.e. third party killer).
    2.actus rea, causation
42
Q

When does a felony merge with the homicide?

A

When it is assaultive in nature (involves an immediate threat of violent injury)

43
Q

When is a felony inherently dangerous (question of law)?

A
  1. Statutory interpretation (does it sound dangerous)
  2. ask whether felony can be committed without creating substantial risk of death (methlab case)
44
Q

What is the agency rule limit for 2nd degree felony murder?

A

A felon cannot be convicted of felony murder if the killing is the direct result of a third party (someone who is not the felon or the felon’s agent). If a third-party is the direct cause of death, this essentially breaks the causal chain

45
Q

What is evidence of an agreement for conspiracy?

A

Often circumstantial evidence suggesting choreography

46
Q

What are the elements of conspiracy?

A

Actus Rea: (1) an agreement to commit a crime and (2) An overt act in furtherance by any of the co-conspirators
Mens rea: (3) D intended to enter into the agreement; and (4) D must intend for the target offense to be committed.

47
Q

Do co-conspirators need to know every detail of the plan?

A

No, just awareness of the essential nature

48
Q

How substantial does an overt act for conspiracy need to be?

A

Can be much less substantial than “goes beyond mere preparation”

49
Q

What is Pinkerton liability?

A

If parties enter into a conspiracy, co-conspirators can be convicted of
(1) the crime of conspiracy,
(2) the target offense if successful, and
(3) any other crime committed by any co-conspirator if (a) in furtherance of consp. and (b) objectively reasonably foreseeable of original agreement.

50
Q

What are the 3 elements of self-defense?

A

The defendant must have an honest and reasonable (objective) belief that:
1. Victim threatened imminent force;
2. It was necessary to use force to repel the threat of force; and
3. The force used was proportional to the force threatened

51
Q

What are factors to consider for self-defense objective analaysis?

A
  1. defendant’s relevant knowledge of the aggressor
  2. physical attributes of all persons involved
  3. prior experiences defendant had that could inform the belief of the victim’s intenttions
52
Q

What are the limits of self defense?

A
  1. Can’t be the inititial aggressor, unless you clearly withdraw
  2. duty to retreat (minority) if reasonable and poss.
  3. Castle doctrine: don’t have to retreat if in your home or in immediate premises
53
Q

What is imperfect self-defense? How does it affect a murder charge?

A

Initial aggressor; or response to non-deadly force with deadly force; or unreasonable belief of imminent threat of deadly force.

Brings 2nd Degree down to Voluntary MS

54
Q

Can self-defense be used in defense of others?

A

Yes, if (1) the defendant honestly and reasonably believe that it (2) was necessary to use force (non-deadly or deadly) to repel a threat of imminent force (non-deadly or deadly) to a third party

55
Q

When can the defense of habitation be used?

A

Jdx Split.
An actor may use deadly force to prevent an intruder from entering his or her residence when they honestly and reasonably believe that deadly force is necessary to:
1. prevent imminent unlawful entry by an intruder who intends to commit a felony once inside.
2. prevent imminent unlawful entry by an intruder who intends to commit a violent felony once inside (i.e., rape, robbery, murder, arson, aggravated assault)

56
Q

When can defense of property be used?

A

When using force to prevent dispossession of property or using force promptly after dispossesion to repossess property. Deadly force is never ok in defense of property.

57
Q

What is needed for a successful defense of property claim?

A

Defendant must honestly and reasonably believe that:
1. It is necessary to use non-deadly force
2. to prevent imminent dispossession of property (or to reposses)

58
Q

What are the 6 required elements for the defense of necessity?

A

( Imminent, reasonable, legal alternative, balance of harms, leg. intent, clean hands)
1. Clear and imminent danger (“significant evil”);
2. Reasonable belief that breaking the law will directly abate the danger;
3. No effective legal alternatives;
4. Balance the harms: the harm in breaking the law is less than the the harm in not breaking the law;
5. No clear legislative intent to prohibit necessity defense under the facts; and
6. D must have clean hands (i.e., did not substantially contribute to the harm D seeks to avoid).

59
Q

What are the 3 elements of duress?

A
  1. Another person threatened imminent deadly harm or serious bodily injury—to the defendant or a third person—if the defendant does not commit the offense;
  2. The defendant reasonably believed that the threat was real (would be carried out); and
  3. The defendant had no reasonable opportunity to escape.

Criminal Law (1 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions