multiple-TFs Flashcards

1
Q

when does J/S liability apply?

A

when two or more tortious acts combine to proximately cause an indivisible injury to P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what does it mean that a TF is jointly and severally liable?

A

each TF owes full damage amt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what’s the rule for joint liability?

A

each legngent D is fully responsible for a P’s damages, assuming that the D’s caused an indivisible harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what’s the rule for several liability?

A

liability is several when D’s cause distinct or separable components of a P’s harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

four times when J/S liability doesn’t apply?

A

each TF acted independently, P’s injury is divisible, possible to ID injuries caused by each, intentional torts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how does satisfaction relate to P’s ability to pursue jointly liable parties?

A

until satisfaction, P may proceed against other jointly liable parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

define satisfaction

A

when a P recovers full payment from one TF either by settlement or judgment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what happens to P’s ability to recover against other TF’s after satisfaction?

A

once satisfaction is achieved, P can’t recover further against other TF’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

define a release

A

surrender of P’s cause of action against the party to whom the release is given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

is a release against one TF effective against all other TF’s?

A

release of one TF does not discharge other TF’s unless explicitly provided in the release agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how is the liability of each other TF calculated after P has “released” one of the TF’s?

A

other TF’s still liable for full amt originally J/S liable for minus the amt paid by one TF in the release

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was the holding in Carolina v. Hill?

A

where there are several non-negligent causes that aren’t separable, either of which suffic to cause entire loss, all are J/S liable for the entire loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

give the fact summary and general topic for Carolina v. Hill.

A

RR damaged P’s farm by blasting and water diversion, court said imposs to separate (lumber co contributed) so P could recover for all damages solely from the RR (J/S liability)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the four general theories of joint liability?

A

concert of action, enterprise liability, alternative liab, market share liab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what type of agreement between TF’s is needed for concert of action?

A

agreement between two or more TF’s to injure P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what tpe of liability does a D have when he’s participated in “concert of action”?

A

both participants are J/S liable for entire damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what if an injury resulting from “concert of action” is divisible? still J/S liability?

A

yes - each participant is liable because he has either performed the harm himself or encouraged or induced the tort to happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what’s the case name and holding used for “concert of action”?

A

Biercyzski v. Rogers - D’s racing on highway were both liable even though one’s car didn’t touch the D - J/S liable because one caused and one encouraged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are two policy reasons for enterprise liability?

A

unfair for P to have not a remedy when the specific manuf can’t be identified, makes entire industry safer because manuf on hook for liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

how many manuf are typically involved in enterprise liability?

A

court says in the Hall case (enterprise liab case) that it should be limited in use to industries with just a few players

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what’s the case name and facts of the Enterprise Liability case we read?

A

Hall v DuPont - blasting caps injured kids - couldn’t tell who manuf because info was on the blasting cap itself

22
Q

what was the holding from Hall v DuPont?

A

enterprise liab - existence of industry-wide standards alone won’t support EL, but could support a finding of joint control of risk and shift burden of proving causation to D’s

23
Q

what is the definition of alternative liability, and from which case is the definition derived?

A

Summers v Tice - alt liab places burden of proof on D if P can’t prove which of multiple D’s caused the injury

24
Q

what happened in Summers v Tice?

A

Alternative liab - P injured by bird shot from one of his two hunting buddies, but couldn’t tell which one!

25
Q

how many D’s are necessary (or recommended) for market share liability?

A

substantial share of the industry players - larger number than in the case of enterprise liab

26
Q

how does market share liab allocate the liability?

A

proportional damages based on manuf’s percentage of sales in that market

27
Q

what are two policy reasons for market share liab?

A

manuf in best position to discover/warn against defects, holding them liable provides incentive for safety

28
Q

what exception to market share liab was established by the Sindell v Abbott Labs case?

A

each D is liable for proportion of judgment rep by its share of market UNLESS it shows it couldn’t have made product which caused P’s injuries

29
Q

what happened in the Sindell v Abbott Labs case?

A

market share liab - P’s mom took miscarriage drug that caused latent cancer

30
Q

what happened in the Hamilton v Accutek case?

A

market share liab - relatives of six people killed by handguns sued 25 handgun manuf’s for negligence

31
Q

how does probability factor into the Hamilton v Accutek case?

A

market share liab - indiv D’s share of liab is based on probability that tis product actuallyc aused harm, with probability determined by market share

32
Q

when is contribution applicable?

A

if a TF required to pay damages under J/S liab pays more than their share of damages, then that TF has a claim against other liable parties for excess the first party paid

33
Q

define contribution

A

allows for apportionment of responsibility among at-fault parties

34
Q

what are the two rules (majority and minority) of contribution?

A

comparative contribution (majority) and equal shares (minority)

35
Q

what type of torts can contribution NOT be used for?

A

intentional torts

36
Q

what’s the diff between comparative contribution and equal shares?

A

CC is imposed in proportion to relative fault of TF, ES is imposed on all TF’s as equal shares of damages regardless of their relative degrees of fault

37
Q

how do D’s go after each other for contribution?

A

multi-party D’s file cross claims for contribution while the action is still in court - doesn’t wait till after judgment

38
Q

define indemnity

A

rule that compels one TF to COMPLETELY reimburse another who has paid a judgment to a P

39
Q

how does indemnity apportion or split up the loss to TF’s?

A

doesn’t apportion the loss, but shifts the ENTIRE LOSS between TF’s

40
Q

give three reasons why indemnity is applied

A

contract, vicarious liability, strict products liability

41
Q

when does existence of a K incur indemnity?

A

if there’s a clear agreement to indemnify another against consequences of their own negligence

42
Q

when does vicarious liability incur indemnity?

A

when one has to pay damages caused by another simply because of his relationship to that person

43
Q

what are two types of relationships that incur vicarious liability and therefore require indemnity?

A

employer and employee, landowner and independent contractor

44
Q

what options does a D have once they’ve been held vicariously liable for another’s damages?

A

can seek indemnification from that true at-fault party

45
Q

who is liable in a strict products liability scenario?

A

everyone in the distribution chain

46
Q

what options does each liable party have in a strict products liability once they’ve been held liable?

A

each entity in the distribution chain has the potential right of indemnity against all others in the chain

47
Q

what happened in the Nat’l Health Labs v Ahmadi case?

A

indemnity - malpractice suit against medical group and lab - permanent paralysis due to misdiagnosis

48
Q

what was the holding in Nat’l Health Labs v Ahmadi case?

A

indemnity - when two TF’s jointly contribute to harm, both are potentially liable for entire harm, but share equally in satisfaction thru contribution

49
Q

what happened in the Bervoets v. Pontiac case?

A

indemnity - passenger injured in car accident, driver liable, driver sued bar for contribution cuz they sold him alcohol

50
Q

what was the holding in Bervoets v Pontiac?

A

indemnity - jury in contribution action is first to consider approp award of damages, then determine fault of all parties & order contrib