Multiple Choice/EPPP Flashcards
Animals in Research
Standard 8.09 requires psychologists to ‘acquire, care for, use, and dispose of animals in compliance with current federal, state, and local laws and regulations, and with professional standards’ and ‘to make reasonable efforts to minimize the discomfort, infection, illness, and pain of animal subjects.’ It also states that, ‘when it is appropriate that an animal’s life be terminated, psychologists proceed rapidly, with an effort to minimize the pain and in accordance with accepted procedures.
Collection Agencies
Standard 6.04 states that ‘if the recipient of services does not pay for services as agreed, and if psychologists intend to use collection agencies or legal measures to collect the fees, psychologists first inform the person that such measures will be taken and provide that person an opportunity to make prompt payment.’
Education and Supervision
Standards 7.01 through 7.06 address education and supervision and require psychologists to act competently and responsibly when teaching, supervising, and designing education and training programs and to avoid misrepresenting themselves or their work when performing these functions.
Informed Consent and Assent
Standard 3.10 states that ‘when psychologists conduct research or provide assessment, therapy, counseling, or consulting services in person or via electronic transmission or other forms of communication, they obtain the informed consent of the individual or individuals using language that is reasonably understandable to that person or persons.’ It also states that ‘for persons who are legally incapable of giving informed consent, psychologists nevertheless (1) provide an appropriate explanation, (2) seek the individual’s assent, (3) consider such persons’ preferences and best interests, and (4) obtain appropriate permission from a legally authorized person.’
Personal Problems
Standard 2.06 states: ‘(a) Psychologists refrain from initiating an activity when they known or should know that there is a substantial likelihood that their personal problems will prevent them from performing their work-related activities in a competent manner…[and] (b) When psychologists become aware of personal problems that may interfere with their performing work-related duties adequately, they take appropriate measures, such as obtaining professional consultation, or assistance, and determine whether they should limit, suspend, or terminate their work-related duties.’
Sexual Misconduct by Psychotherapists
Research on sexual misconduct has found that male therapists engage in sexual and other dual relationships with clients much more often than female therapists. The data also show that male therapists who engage in sexual misconduct are usually older than the female clients they become involved with, with the average therapist being between 42 and 44 and the client being between 30 and 33. No consistent relationship has been found between risk for sexual misconduct and theoretical orientation, professional experience, or education (Pope et al., 1993).
Avoiding Bias in Language
The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association provides guidelines for avoiding bias in language related to race/ethnicity, gender, age, and sexual orientation. For example, it recommends putting ‘people first’ (e.g., ‘clients with a disability’, rather than “disabled clients’); being specific when referring to race and avoiding using Whites as a comparison group; and using emotionally neutral terms (e.g., “people with a disease’ rather than ‘people afflicted by a disease’).
Competence
Standard 2.01 requires psychologists to ‘provide services, teach, and conduct research within populations and in areas only within the boundaries of their competence based on their education, training, supervised experience, consultation, study, or professional experience’.
EPPP
The EPPP (Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology) is a requirement for licensure in the United States and Canada. It is prepared by the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (ASPPB) and is designed to assist the boards ‘in their evaluation of the qualifications of applicants for licensure and certification’ by assessing ‘the knowledge that the most recent practice analysis has determined as foundational to the competent practice of psychology’ (ASPPB, 2010).
Informed Consent for Research
Standard 8.02 states: ‘(a) When obtaining informed consent…, psychologists inform participants about (1) the purpose of the research, expected duration, and procedures; (2) their right to decline to participate and to withdraw from the research once participation has begun; (3) the foreseeable consequences of declining or withdrawing; (4) reasonably foreseeable factors that may be expected to influence their willingness to participate such as potential risks, discomfort, or adverse effects; (5) any prospective research benefits; (6) limits of confidentiality; (7) incentives for participation; and (8) whom to contact for questions about the research and research participants’ rights’.
Privilege and Holder of the Privilege
Privilege is a legal concept that protects a client’s confidentiality in the context of legal proceedings. Most jurisdictions have laws that establish privilege for communications between licensed mental health practitioners and their clients. The client is ordinarily the ‘holder of the privilege’, but a psychologist can claim the privilege on behalf of a client, and there are legally defined exceptions to privilege.
Sexual Relations with Students and Supervisees
Standard 7.07 states that ‘psychologists do not engage in sexual relationships with students or supervisees who are in their department, agency, or training center or over whom psychologists have or are likely to have evaluative authority’.
Client Access to Records
Client access to records is determined by law but, in general, the psychologist is the owner of the physical record while the client has the right to inspect the contents of the record.
Confidentiality
Confidentiality refers to the obligation of psychologists to protect clients from unauthorized disclosure of information revealed in the context of the professional relationship. Confidentiality is an ethical principle and, in some situations, a legal requirement.
General Guidelines for Providers of Psychological Services
The General Guidelines were adopted ‘as a means of self-regulation in the public interest’, and its provisions are general and aspirational. It delineates basic guiding principles for all providers of psychological services (except for those who teach psychology, conduct research, or write and edit scientific manuscripts), and its goal is to ‘improve the quality, effectiveness, and accessibility of psychological services.’
Interruption and Termination of Therapy
Standard 10.10 requires psychologists to ‘terminate therapy when it becomes reasonably clear that the client/patient no longer needs the service, is not likely to benefit, or is being harmed by continued service’ and, when doing so, to ‘provide pre termination counseling and suggest alternative service providers as appropriate.’ An exception to this general rule is provided in Standard 10.10(b), which states that pre termination counseling or referral is not necessary when a psychologist is terminating therapy with a client because the client or a person the client has a relationship with poses a threat to the psychologist.
Referral Fees
Standard 6.07 states: ‘When psychologists pay, receive payment from, or divide fees with another professional, other than in an employer-employee relationship, they payment to each is based on the services provided (clinical, consultative, administrative, or other) and is not based on the referral itself.’
Tarasoff Decision
The original Tarasoff decision established a ‘duty to warn’ an intended victim of a therapy client; however, in a rehearing of the case, this was changed to a ‘duty to protect’ and intended victim by warning them, notifying the police, or taking other steps. In most jurisdictions, the duty to warn/protect applies only when a client poses a clear and imminent danger to an identifiable victim or victims (although, in some jurisdictions, the duty has been expanded to include an identifiable ‘class of victims’).
Client Testimonials
Standard 5.05 states that ‘psychologists do not solicit testimonials from current therapy clients/patients or other persons who because of their particular circumstances are vulnerable to undue influence.’
Consultation
Standard 4.06 states that ‘when consulting with colleagues, (1) psychologists do not disclose confidential information that reasonably could lead to the identification of a client/patient, research participant, or other person or organization with whom they have a confidential relationship unless they have obtained the prior consent of the person or organization or the disclosure cannot be avoided, and (2) they disclose information only to the extent necessary to achieve the purposes of the consultation’.
Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Family Law Proceedings
The goal of the Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations is ‘to promote proficiency’ in the conduct of child custody evaluations, and it provides aspirational guidelines that are intended to ‘facilitate the continued systematic development of the profession and help facilitate a high level of practice by psychologists.’ It states that determining the ‘psychologist best interests’ of the child is the primary purpose of a child custody evaluation and that the child’s welfare is always of paramount importance.
Malpractice
For a client or other person to bring a claim of malpractice against a psychologist, four conditions must be met: (1) The psychologist must have had a professional relationships with the person that established a legal duty of care. (2) There must be a demonstrable standard of care that the psychologist has breached. (3) The person suffered harm or injury. (4) The psychologist’s breach of duty within the context of the standard of care was the proximate cause of the person’s harm or injury.
Responding to a Subpoena
(1) The first step is to determine if the subpoena is a legally valid demand. (2) If the subpoena is valid, a formal response is required, but the psychologist should first contact the client to discuss the implications of providing the requested information. (3) If the client consents to disclosure and there is no valid reason for withholding the information, the psychologist should provide the requested information. If the client does not consent, the psychologist or their attorney can attempt to negotiate with the party who issued the subpoena. (4) If the client does not consent and the requesting party continues to demand that the information be provided, the psychologist can seek guidance from the court informally through a letter or have their attorney file a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order.
Test Data and Materials
Standard 9.04 defines test data as ‘raw and scaled scores, client/patient responses to test questions or stimuli, and psychologists’ notes and recordings concerning client/patient statements and behavior during an examination.’ It also states that ‘pursuant to a client/patient release, psychologists provide test data to the client/patient or other persons identified in the release’. Standard 9.11 requires psychologists to ‘make reasonable efforts’ to protect the integrity and security of test materials, which include ‘manuals, instruments, protocols, and test questions or stimuli.’